'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment

Sarah Collins, Paul Drew, Ian Watt, Vikki Entwistle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more 'bilateral' to more 'unilateral'. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2611-2627
Number of pages17
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume61
Issue number12
Early online date11 Jul 2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Decision Making
decision making
Ear Neoplasms
Referral and Consultation
Nose Neoplasms
Patient Participation
Pharynx
chronic illness
Primary Health Care
cancer
conversation
Therapeutics
participation
Health
health
management
Ear
Diabetes
Cancer
Doctors

Keywords

  • doctor-patient consultations
  • decision-making
  • conversation analysis
  • patient participation
  • United Kingdom

Cite this

'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment. / Collins, Sarah; Drew, Paul; Watt, Ian; Entwistle, Vikki.

In: Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 61, No. 12, 12.2005, p. 2611-2627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collins, Sarah ; Drew, Paul ; Watt, Ian ; Entwistle, Vikki. / 'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment. In: Social Science & Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 61, No. 12. pp. 2611-2627.
@article{90500ee5647944a19e502156d457fb87,
title = "'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment",
abstract = "Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more 'bilateral' to more 'unilateral'. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making.",
keywords = "doctor-patient consultations, decision-making, conversation analysis, patient participation, United Kingdom",
author = "Sarah Collins and Paul Drew and Ian Watt and Vikki Entwistle",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "2611--2627",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment

AU - Collins, Sarah

AU - Drew, Paul

AU - Watt, Ian

AU - Entwistle, Vikki

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more 'bilateral' to more 'unilateral'. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making.

AB - Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more 'bilateral' to more 'unilateral'. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making.

KW - doctor-patient consultations

KW - decision-making

KW - conversation analysis

KW - patient participation

KW - United Kingdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644556915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047

M3 - Article

C2 - 16006027

AN - SCOPUS:27644556915

VL - 61

SP - 2611

EP - 2627

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 12

ER -