Unionism and peer-referencing

Georgios A. Panos, Ioannis Theodossiou

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

This study assesses the “fair-wage-effort” hypothesis, by examining (a) the relationship between relative wage comparisons and job satisfaction and quitting intensions, and (b) the relative ranking of stated effort inducing-incentives, in a novel dataset of unionised and non-unionised European employees. By distinguishing between downward and upward-looking wage comparisons, it is shown that wage comparisons to similar workers exert an asymmetric impact on the job satisfaction of union workers, a pattern consistent with inequity-aversion and conformism to the reference point. Moreover, union workers evaluate peer observation and good industrial relations more highly than payment and other incentives. In contrast, non-union workers are found to be more status-seeking in their satisfaction responses and less dependent on their peers in their effort choices The results are robust to endogenous union membership, considerations of generic loss aversion and across different tenure profiles. They are supportive of the individual egalitarian bias of collective wage determination and self-enforcing effort norms.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCentre for European Labour Market Research
Number of pages55
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

Publication series

NameUniversity of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series
No.03
Volume2010
ISSN (Print)0143-4543

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Unionism and peer-referencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Panos, G. A., & Theodossiou, I. (2010). Unionism and peer-referencing. (University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series; Vol. 2010, No. 03). Centre for European Labour Market Research. http://hdl.handle.net/2164/313