Unlearning (Un)Located Ideas in the Provincialization of Urban Theory

Mary Lawhon*, Jonathan Silver, Henrik Ernstson, Joseph Pierce

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lawhon M., Silver J., Ernstson H. and Pierce J. Unlearning (un)located ideas in the provincialization of urban theory, Regional Studies. Postcolonial scholars have argued for the provincialization of urban knowledge, but doing so remains an opaque process. This paper argues that explicit attention to ‘learning to unlearn’ unstated theoretical assumptions and normativities can aid in provincialization, and demonstrate ways in which theorizing entails a socio-spatial situation. The authors’ efforts to grapple with operationalizing learning to unlearn in three different urban cases are described, followed by an articulation of strategies for theorizing which more explicitly acknowledge theory-building’s situatedness as well as points of reflection for developing postcolonial urban theory. It is argued that this usefully shifts the focus of unlearning from ‘who’ is theorizing ‘where’ towards theory’s unstated norms and assumptions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1611-1622
Number of pages12
JournalRegional Studies
Volume50
Issue number9
Early online date4 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Provincializing theory
  • Situated urban political ecology
  • Unlearning
  • Urban theory

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Unlearning (Un)Located Ideas in the Provincialization of Urban Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this