Unlucky Section 13: Sexual Activity between Children and the Sexual Offences Act 2003

Adam Drew Perry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of section 13 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 is to protect children from sexual exploitation by other children. To achieve that end, the section prohibits almost all sexual activity between children, and so prohibits mostly innocent, ordinary activity. The government in 2003 trusted that prosecutors would exercise their discretion to trim section 13's overreach. Prosecutorial discretion carries its own high costs however: it deters conduct beyond section 13's intended scope, and it undermines the rule of law. Moreover, there was a better alternative, open to the government at the time. Prohibiting only sexual activity between dissimilar aged children would have largely achieved section 13's purpose without the same need for prosecutorial discretion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-337
Number of pages11
JournalKing's Law Journal
Volume20
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2009

Fingerprint

sexual offense
act
constitutional state
exploitation
costs

Cite this

Unlucky Section 13 : Sexual Activity between Children and the Sexual Offences Act 2003. / Perry, Adam Drew.

In: King's Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.07.2009, p. 327-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c908538f842403fbfde812442463c73,
title = "Unlucky Section 13: Sexual Activity between Children and the Sexual Offences Act 2003",
abstract = "The purpose of section 13 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 is to protect children from sexual exploitation by other children. To achieve that end, the section prohibits almost all sexual activity between children, and so prohibits mostly innocent, ordinary activity. The government in 2003 trusted that prosecutors would exercise their discretion to trim section 13's overreach. Prosecutorial discretion carries its own high costs however: it deters conduct beyond section 13's intended scope, and it undermines the rule of law. Moreover, there was a better alternative, open to the government at the time. Prohibiting only sexual activity between dissimilar aged children would have largely achieved section 13's purpose without the same need for prosecutorial discretion.",
author = "Perry, {Adam Drew}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "327--337",
journal = "King's Law Journal",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unlucky Section 13

T2 - Sexual Activity between Children and the Sexual Offences Act 2003

AU - Perry, Adam Drew

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - The purpose of section 13 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 is to protect children from sexual exploitation by other children. To achieve that end, the section prohibits almost all sexual activity between children, and so prohibits mostly innocent, ordinary activity. The government in 2003 trusted that prosecutors would exercise their discretion to trim section 13's overreach. Prosecutorial discretion carries its own high costs however: it deters conduct beyond section 13's intended scope, and it undermines the rule of law. Moreover, there was a better alternative, open to the government at the time. Prohibiting only sexual activity between dissimilar aged children would have largely achieved section 13's purpose without the same need for prosecutorial discretion.

AB - The purpose of section 13 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 is to protect children from sexual exploitation by other children. To achieve that end, the section prohibits almost all sexual activity between children, and so prohibits mostly innocent, ordinary activity. The government in 2003 trusted that prosecutors would exercise their discretion to trim section 13's overreach. Prosecutorial discretion carries its own high costs however: it deters conduct beyond section 13's intended scope, and it undermines the rule of law. Moreover, there was a better alternative, open to the government at the time. Prohibiting only sexual activity between dissimilar aged children would have largely achieved section 13's purpose without the same need for prosecutorial discretion.

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 327

EP - 337

JO - King's Law Journal

JF - King's Law Journal

IS - 2

ER -