Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review

Lindsay C. Stringer, Andrew J. Dougill, Evan Fraser, Klaus Hubacek, Christina Prell, Mark Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

323 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Adaptive management has the potential to make environmental management more democratic through the involvement of different stakeholders. In this article, we examine three case studies at different scales that followed adaptive management processes, critically reflecting upon the role of stakeholder participation in each case. Specifically, we examine at which stages different types of stakeholders can play key roles and the ways that each might be involved. We show that a range of participatory mechanisms can be employed at different stages of the adaptive cycle, and can work together to create conditions for social learning and favorable outcomes for diverse stakeholders. This analysis highlights the need for greater reflection on case study research in order to further refine participatory processes within adaptive management. This should not only address the shortcomings and successes of adaptive management as a form of democratic environmental governance, but should also unpack the links between science, institutions, knowledge, and power.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages22
JournalEcology and Society
Volume11
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

Keywords

  • adaptive management
  • democratic governance
  • participation
  • stakeholder involvement
  • ecosystem management
  • resource-management
  • citizen participation
  • sustainability
  • knowledge
  • comanagement
  • conservation
  • mechanisms
  • Australia
  • Pitfalls

Cite this

Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., & Reed, M. (2006). Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review. Ecology and Society, 11(2).

Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review. / Stringer, Lindsay C.; Dougill, Andrew J.; Fraser, Evan; Hubacek, Klaus; Prell, Christina; Reed, Mark.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 11, No. 2, 12.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

Stringer, LC, Dougill, AJ, Fraser, E, Hubacek, K, Prell, C & Reed, M 2006, 'Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review', Ecology and Society, vol. 11, no. 2.
Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Fraser E, Hubacek K, Prell C, Reed M. Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review. Ecology and Society. 2006 Dec;11(2).
Stringer, Lindsay C. ; Dougill, Andrew J. ; Fraser, Evan ; Hubacek, Klaus ; Prell, Christina ; Reed, Mark. / Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review. In: Ecology and Society. 2006 ; Vol. 11, No. 2.
@article{bc4870da72f04cc9b34e7564000b2b02,
title = "Unpacking {"}participation{"} in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review",
abstract = "Adaptive management has the potential to make environmental management more democratic through the involvement of different stakeholders. In this article, we examine three case studies at different scales that followed adaptive management processes, critically reflecting upon the role of stakeholder participation in each case. Specifically, we examine at which stages different types of stakeholders can play key roles and the ways that each might be involved. We show that a range of participatory mechanisms can be employed at different stages of the adaptive cycle, and can work together to create conditions for social learning and favorable outcomes for diverse stakeholders. This analysis highlights the need for greater reflection on case study research in order to further refine participatory processes within adaptive management. This should not only address the shortcomings and successes of adaptive management as a form of democratic environmental governance, but should also unpack the links between science, institutions, knowledge, and power.",
keywords = "adaptive management, democratic governance, participation, stakeholder involvement, ecosystem management, resource-management, citizen participation, sustainability, knowledge, comanagement, conservation, mechanisms, Australia, Pitfalls",
author = "Stringer, {Lindsay C.} and Dougill, {Andrew J.} and Evan Fraser and Klaus Hubacek and Christina Prell and Mark Reed",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social ecological systems: A critical review

AU - Stringer, Lindsay C.

AU - Dougill, Andrew J.

AU - Fraser, Evan

AU - Hubacek, Klaus

AU - Prell, Christina

AU - Reed, Mark

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Adaptive management has the potential to make environmental management more democratic through the involvement of different stakeholders. In this article, we examine three case studies at different scales that followed adaptive management processes, critically reflecting upon the role of stakeholder participation in each case. Specifically, we examine at which stages different types of stakeholders can play key roles and the ways that each might be involved. We show that a range of participatory mechanisms can be employed at different stages of the adaptive cycle, and can work together to create conditions for social learning and favorable outcomes for diverse stakeholders. This analysis highlights the need for greater reflection on case study research in order to further refine participatory processes within adaptive management. This should not only address the shortcomings and successes of adaptive management as a form of democratic environmental governance, but should also unpack the links between science, institutions, knowledge, and power.

AB - Adaptive management has the potential to make environmental management more democratic through the involvement of different stakeholders. In this article, we examine three case studies at different scales that followed adaptive management processes, critically reflecting upon the role of stakeholder participation in each case. Specifically, we examine at which stages different types of stakeholders can play key roles and the ways that each might be involved. We show that a range of participatory mechanisms can be employed at different stages of the adaptive cycle, and can work together to create conditions for social learning and favorable outcomes for diverse stakeholders. This analysis highlights the need for greater reflection on case study research in order to further refine participatory processes within adaptive management. This should not only address the shortcomings and successes of adaptive management as a form of democratic environmental governance, but should also unpack the links between science, institutions, knowledge, and power.

KW - adaptive management

KW - democratic governance

KW - participation

KW - stakeholder involvement

KW - ecosystem management

KW - resource-management

KW - citizen participation

KW - sustainability

KW - knowledge

KW - comanagement

KW - conservation

KW - mechanisms

KW - Australia

KW - Pitfalls

M3 - Literature review

VL - 11

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 2

ER -