Unpicking Priest's Bootstraps

Toby Meadows

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Graham Priest has argued that the fruits of classical set theory can be obtained by naive means through a puzzling piece of reasoning often known as the bootstrapping argument [Priest, 2006]. I will demonstrate that the bootstrapping involved is best understood as viciously circular and thus, that these fruits remain forbidden. The argument has only one rehearsal in print and it is quite subtle. This paper provides reconstruction of the argument based on [Priest, 2006] and attempts some fixes and alternative construals to get around some elementary problems. Despite these efforts the argument remains unconvincing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-188
Number of pages8
JournalThought: A Journal of Philosophy
Volume4
Issue number3
Early online date27 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Bootstrap
Priests
Bootstrapping
Fruit
Rehearsal
Set Theory
Construal

Keywords

  • philosophy of mathematics
  • philosophical logic
  • set theory
  • foundations of mathematics
  • nonclassical logic

Cite this

Unpicking Priest's Bootstraps. / Meadows, Toby.

In: Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 4, No. 3, 09.2015, p. 181-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meadows, Toby. / Unpicking Priest's Bootstraps. In: Thought: A Journal of Philosophy. 2015 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 181-188.
@article{ce3b5c608b39459c9eae4e452ba12a9f,
title = "Unpicking Priest's Bootstraps",
abstract = "Graham Priest has argued that the fruits of classical set theory can be obtained by naive means through a puzzling piece of reasoning often known as the bootstrapping argument [Priest, 2006]. I will demonstrate that the bootstrapping involved is best understood as viciously circular and thus, that these fruits remain forbidden. The argument has only one rehearsal in print and it is quite subtle. This paper provides reconstruction of the argument based on [Priest, 2006] and attempts some fixes and alternative construals to get around some elementary problems. Despite these efforts the argument remains unconvincing.",
keywords = "philosophy of mathematics, philosophical logic, set theory, foundations of mathematics, nonclassical logic",
author = "Toby Meadows",
note = "Date of Acceptance: 13/07/2015",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/tht3.172",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "181--188",
journal = "Thought: A Journal of Philosophy",
issn = "2161-2234",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpicking Priest's Bootstraps

AU - Meadows, Toby

N1 - Date of Acceptance: 13/07/2015

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - Graham Priest has argued that the fruits of classical set theory can be obtained by naive means through a puzzling piece of reasoning often known as the bootstrapping argument [Priest, 2006]. I will demonstrate that the bootstrapping involved is best understood as viciously circular and thus, that these fruits remain forbidden. The argument has only one rehearsal in print and it is quite subtle. This paper provides reconstruction of the argument based on [Priest, 2006] and attempts some fixes and alternative construals to get around some elementary problems. Despite these efforts the argument remains unconvincing.

AB - Graham Priest has argued that the fruits of classical set theory can be obtained by naive means through a puzzling piece of reasoning often known as the bootstrapping argument [Priest, 2006]. I will demonstrate that the bootstrapping involved is best understood as viciously circular and thus, that these fruits remain forbidden. The argument has only one rehearsal in print and it is quite subtle. This paper provides reconstruction of the argument based on [Priest, 2006] and attempts some fixes and alternative construals to get around some elementary problems. Despite these efforts the argument remains unconvincing.

KW - philosophy of mathematics

KW - philosophical logic

KW - set theory

KW - foundations of mathematics

KW - nonclassical logic

U2 - 10.1002/tht3.172

DO - 10.1002/tht3.172

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 181

EP - 188

JO - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy

JF - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy

SN - 2161-2234

IS - 3

ER -