Use of optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting

S. Khandhadia, K. C. Madhusudhana, A. Kostakou, John Vincent Forrester, R. S. B. Newsom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To compare nurse-guided Optomap retinal imaging with examination by an eye casualty officer, in detecting clinically significant peripheral retinal lesions in patients with retinal symptoms.

Methods: 219 patients presenting to eye casualty with retinal symptoms (flashing lights and floaters) were recruited. Retinal images were taken with the Optomap imaging system, and graded by an independent masked ophthalmologist. The findings from the Optomap and casualty officer were compared with a gold-standard examination with scleral indentation performed by a retinal specialist. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the Optomap and casualty officer.

Results: The final analysis included 205 eyes of 187 patients. The sensitivity of the Optomap for detecting retinal detachment (n = 7) was 100% (95% CI 59-100%), the same as the casualty officer. For retinal holes/tears (n = 18) the Optomap sensitivity was 33% (13-59%), compared with 67% (41-87%) for the casualty officer. Combining all retinal lesions (n = 52), the sensitivity was 62% (47-75%) and 73% (59-84%), with specificity 96% (92-99%) and 98% (94-100%) for the Optomap and casualty officer respectively.

Conclusion: The Optomap detects retinal detachments successfully but, due to limitations in the optics, is not able to accurately detect retinal holes and tears.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-55
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume93
Issue number1
Early online date29 Oct 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009

Keywords

  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Microscopy, Confocal
  • Middle Aged
  • Ophthalmoscopy
  • Retinal Detachment
  • Retinal Perforations
  • Sclera
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Cite this

Khandhadia, S., Madhusudhana, K. C., Kostakou, A., Forrester, J. V., & Newsom, R. S. B. (2009). Use of optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 93(1), 52-55. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.148072

Use of optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting. / Khandhadia, S.; Madhusudhana, K. C.; Kostakou, A.; Forrester, John Vincent; Newsom, R. S. B.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 93, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 52-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khandhadia, S, Madhusudhana, KC, Kostakou, A, Forrester, JV & Newsom, RSB 2009, 'Use of optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting', British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 52-55. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.148072
Khandhadia S, Madhusudhana KC, Kostakou A, Forrester JV, Newsom RSB. Use of optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;93(1):52-55. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.148072
Khandhadia, S. ; Madhusudhana, K. C. ; Kostakou, A. ; Forrester, John Vincent ; Newsom, R. S. B. / Use of optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009 ; Vol. 93, No. 1. pp. 52-55.
@article{f6994522e50e4d5dab1a1fb4d050a27e,
title = "Use of optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting",
abstract = "Aim: To compare nurse-guided Optomap retinal imaging with examination by an eye casualty officer, in detecting clinically significant peripheral retinal lesions in patients with retinal symptoms.Methods: 219 patients presenting to eye casualty with retinal symptoms (flashing lights and floaters) were recruited. Retinal images were taken with the Optomap imaging system, and graded by an independent masked ophthalmologist. The findings from the Optomap and casualty officer were compared with a gold-standard examination with scleral indentation performed by a retinal specialist. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the Optomap and casualty officer.Results: The final analysis included 205 eyes of 187 patients. The sensitivity of the Optomap for detecting retinal detachment (n = 7) was 100{\%} (95{\%} CI 59-100{\%}), the same as the casualty officer. For retinal holes/tears (n = 18) the Optomap sensitivity was 33{\%} (13-59{\%}), compared with 67{\%} (41-87{\%}) for the casualty officer. Combining all retinal lesions (n = 52), the sensitivity was 62{\%} (47-75{\%}) and 73{\%} (59-84{\%}), with specificity 96{\%} (92-99{\%}) and 98{\%} (94-100{\%}) for the Optomap and casualty officer respectively.Conclusion: The Optomap detects retinal detachments successfully but, due to limitations in the optics, is not able to accurately detect retinal holes and tears.",
keywords = "Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Microscopy, Confocal, Middle Aged, Ophthalmoscopy, Retinal Detachment, Retinal Perforations, Sclera, Sensitivity and Specificity",
author = "S. Khandhadia and Madhusudhana, {K. C.} and A. Kostakou and Forrester, {John Vincent} and Newsom, {R. S. B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjo.2008.148072",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "52--55",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting

AU - Khandhadia, S.

AU - Madhusudhana, K. C.

AU - Kostakou, A.

AU - Forrester, John Vincent

AU - Newsom, R. S. B.

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Aim: To compare nurse-guided Optomap retinal imaging with examination by an eye casualty officer, in detecting clinically significant peripheral retinal lesions in patients with retinal symptoms.Methods: 219 patients presenting to eye casualty with retinal symptoms (flashing lights and floaters) were recruited. Retinal images were taken with the Optomap imaging system, and graded by an independent masked ophthalmologist. The findings from the Optomap and casualty officer were compared with a gold-standard examination with scleral indentation performed by a retinal specialist. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the Optomap and casualty officer.Results: The final analysis included 205 eyes of 187 patients. The sensitivity of the Optomap for detecting retinal detachment (n = 7) was 100% (95% CI 59-100%), the same as the casualty officer. For retinal holes/tears (n = 18) the Optomap sensitivity was 33% (13-59%), compared with 67% (41-87%) for the casualty officer. Combining all retinal lesions (n = 52), the sensitivity was 62% (47-75%) and 73% (59-84%), with specificity 96% (92-99%) and 98% (94-100%) for the Optomap and casualty officer respectively.Conclusion: The Optomap detects retinal detachments successfully but, due to limitations in the optics, is not able to accurately detect retinal holes and tears.

AB - Aim: To compare nurse-guided Optomap retinal imaging with examination by an eye casualty officer, in detecting clinically significant peripheral retinal lesions in patients with retinal symptoms.Methods: 219 patients presenting to eye casualty with retinal symptoms (flashing lights and floaters) were recruited. Retinal images were taken with the Optomap imaging system, and graded by an independent masked ophthalmologist. The findings from the Optomap and casualty officer were compared with a gold-standard examination with scleral indentation performed by a retinal specialist. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the Optomap and casualty officer.Results: The final analysis included 205 eyes of 187 patients. The sensitivity of the Optomap for detecting retinal detachment (n = 7) was 100% (95% CI 59-100%), the same as the casualty officer. For retinal holes/tears (n = 18) the Optomap sensitivity was 33% (13-59%), compared with 67% (41-87%) for the casualty officer. Combining all retinal lesions (n = 52), the sensitivity was 62% (47-75%) and 73% (59-84%), with specificity 96% (92-99%) and 98% (94-100%) for the Optomap and casualty officer respectively.Conclusion: The Optomap detects retinal detachments successfully but, due to limitations in the optics, is not able to accurately detect retinal holes and tears.

KW - Emergency Medical Services

KW - Emergency Service, Hospital

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Microscopy, Confocal

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Ophthalmoscopy

KW - Retinal Detachment

KW - Retinal Perforations

KW - Sclera

KW - Sensitivity and Specificity

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2008.148072

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2008.148072

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 52

EP - 55

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 1

ER -