Using Devolution to Set the Agenda? Venue Shift and the Smoking Ban in Scotland

Paul Alexander Cairney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the changing agendas on smoking-related issues in Scotland. It charts the methods that groups, governments and MSPs use to frame and pursue or suppress discussion of the prohibition of smoking in public places. The article presents two narratives—one which stresses ‘new politics’ and the ability of groups to influence policy through Scottish Parliamentary procedures, and another which stresses Scottish Executive ‘business as usual’ and presents smoking legislation as a logical progression from early ministerial commitments. A combination of narratives suggests that tobacco legislation in Scotland was by no means part of an inevitable international trend towards prohibition and this article traces the precise conditions or ‘policy windows’ in which decisions take place. The discussion highlights the often unsettled nature of the devolution settlement and the ability of Scottish issues to influence UK agendas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-89
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volume9
Issue number1
Early online date4 Jan 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

devolution
ban
smoking
decentralization
legislation
ability
tobacco
nicotine
politics
Group
commitment
narrative
trend
prohibition
policy

Cite this

Using Devolution to Set the Agenda? Venue Shift and the Smoking Ban in Scotland. / Cairney, Paul Alexander.

In: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 9, No. 1, 02.2007, p. 73-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6355731d6cf348c7a51515071ac8ed3c,
title = "Using Devolution to Set the Agenda? Venue Shift and the Smoking Ban in Scotland",
abstract = "This article examines the changing agendas on smoking-related issues in Scotland. It charts the methods that groups, governments and MSPs use to frame and pursue or suppress discussion of the prohibition of smoking in public places. The article presents two narratives—one which stresses ‘new politics’ and the ability of groups to influence policy through Scottish Parliamentary procedures, and another which stresses Scottish Executive ‘business as usual’ and presents smoking legislation as a logical progression from early ministerial commitments. A combination of narratives suggests that tobacco legislation in Scotland was by no means part of an inevitable international trend towards prohibition and this article traces the precise conditions or ‘policy windows’ in which decisions take place. The discussion highlights the often unsettled nature of the devolution settlement and the ability of Scottish issues to influence UK agendas.",
author = "Cairney, {Paul Alexander}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-856X.2007.00259.x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "73--89",
journal = "British Journal of Politics and International Relations",
issn = "1369-1481",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Devolution to Set the Agenda? Venue Shift and the Smoking Ban in Scotland

AU - Cairney, Paul Alexander

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - This article examines the changing agendas on smoking-related issues in Scotland. It charts the methods that groups, governments and MSPs use to frame and pursue or suppress discussion of the prohibition of smoking in public places. The article presents two narratives—one which stresses ‘new politics’ and the ability of groups to influence policy through Scottish Parliamentary procedures, and another which stresses Scottish Executive ‘business as usual’ and presents smoking legislation as a logical progression from early ministerial commitments. A combination of narratives suggests that tobacco legislation in Scotland was by no means part of an inevitable international trend towards prohibition and this article traces the precise conditions or ‘policy windows’ in which decisions take place. The discussion highlights the often unsettled nature of the devolution settlement and the ability of Scottish issues to influence UK agendas.

AB - This article examines the changing agendas on smoking-related issues in Scotland. It charts the methods that groups, governments and MSPs use to frame and pursue or suppress discussion of the prohibition of smoking in public places. The article presents two narratives—one which stresses ‘new politics’ and the ability of groups to influence policy through Scottish Parliamentary procedures, and another which stresses Scottish Executive ‘business as usual’ and presents smoking legislation as a logical progression from early ministerial commitments. A combination of narratives suggests that tobacco legislation in Scotland was by no means part of an inevitable international trend towards prohibition and this article traces the precise conditions or ‘policy windows’ in which decisions take place. The discussion highlights the often unsettled nature of the devolution settlement and the ability of Scottish issues to influence UK agendas.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2007.00259.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2007.00259.x

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 73

EP - 89

JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

SN - 1369-1481

IS - 1

ER -