Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity

Emmanouil Mentzakis, Mandy Ryan, Paul McNamee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While informal care is a significant part of non-market economic activity, its value is rarely acknowledged, perhaps reflecting a lack of market data. Traditional methods to value such care include opportunity and replacement cost. This study is the first to employ the discrete choice experiment methodology to value informal care tasks. A monetary value is estimated for three tasks (personal care, supervising and household tasks). The relationship between time spent on formal and informal care is also modelled and preference heterogeneity investigated using the Latent Class Model. Complementarity between supervising tasks and formal care is observed. Monetary compensation is important, with willingness to accept per hour values ranging from pound0.38 to pound0.83 for personal care, pound0.75 for supervising and pound0.31 to pound0.6 for household tasks. Heterogeneity in preferences is observed, with monetary compensation being important for younger people, but insignificant for older individuals. Such heterogeneity is important at the policy level. Values are lower than those generated by opportunity cost and replacement cost methods, perhaps because of the limited ability of revealed preference methods to capture broader aspect of utility. Differences with contingent valuation methods are also observed, suggesting future research should investigate the external validity of the different methods. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)930-944
Number of pages15
JournalHealth Economics
Volume20
Issue number8
Early online date26 Aug 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Patient Care
Compensation and Redress
Costs and Cost Analysis
Aptitude
Nuclear Family
Economics

Keywords

  • informal care
  • valuation
  • discrete choice experiments
  • latent class model
  • willingness-to-pay
  • mixed logit
  • health-care
  • economic valuation
  • stroke survivors
  • older-people
  • caregivers
  • costs
  • attributes

Cite this

Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks : exploring preference heterogeneity. / Mentzakis, Emmanouil; Ryan, Mandy; McNamee, Paul.

In: Health Economics, Vol. 20, No. 8, 08.2011, p. 930-944.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b28a5cfdc27f474dbf16ff92f1068a65,
title = "Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity",
abstract = "While informal care is a significant part of non-market economic activity, its value is rarely acknowledged, perhaps reflecting a lack of market data. Traditional methods to value such care include opportunity and replacement cost. This study is the first to employ the discrete choice experiment methodology to value informal care tasks. A monetary value is estimated for three tasks (personal care, supervising and household tasks). The relationship between time spent on formal and informal care is also modelled and preference heterogeneity investigated using the Latent Class Model. Complementarity between supervising tasks and formal care is observed. Monetary compensation is important, with willingness to accept per hour values ranging from pound0.38 to pound0.83 for personal care, pound0.75 for supervising and pound0.31 to pound0.6 for household tasks. Heterogeneity in preferences is observed, with monetary compensation being important for younger people, but insignificant for older individuals. Such heterogeneity is important at the policy level. Values are lower than those generated by opportunity cost and replacement cost methods, perhaps because of the limited ability of revealed preference methods to capture broader aspect of utility. Differences with contingent valuation methods are also observed, suggesting future research should investigate the external validity of the different methods. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "informal care, valuation, discrete choice experiments, latent class model, willingness-to-pay, mixed logit, health-care, economic valuation, stroke survivors, older-people, caregivers, costs, attributes",
author = "Emmanouil Mentzakis and Mandy Ryan and Paul McNamee",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/hec.1656",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "930--944",
journal = "Health Economics",
issn = "1057-9230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks

T2 - exploring preference heterogeneity

AU - Mentzakis, Emmanouil

AU - Ryan, Mandy

AU - McNamee, Paul

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - While informal care is a significant part of non-market economic activity, its value is rarely acknowledged, perhaps reflecting a lack of market data. Traditional methods to value such care include opportunity and replacement cost. This study is the first to employ the discrete choice experiment methodology to value informal care tasks. A monetary value is estimated for three tasks (personal care, supervising and household tasks). The relationship between time spent on formal and informal care is also modelled and preference heterogeneity investigated using the Latent Class Model. Complementarity between supervising tasks and formal care is observed. Monetary compensation is important, with willingness to accept per hour values ranging from pound0.38 to pound0.83 for personal care, pound0.75 for supervising and pound0.31 to pound0.6 for household tasks. Heterogeneity in preferences is observed, with monetary compensation being important for younger people, but insignificant for older individuals. Such heterogeneity is important at the policy level. Values are lower than those generated by opportunity cost and replacement cost methods, perhaps because of the limited ability of revealed preference methods to capture broader aspect of utility. Differences with contingent valuation methods are also observed, suggesting future research should investigate the external validity of the different methods. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - While informal care is a significant part of non-market economic activity, its value is rarely acknowledged, perhaps reflecting a lack of market data. Traditional methods to value such care include opportunity and replacement cost. This study is the first to employ the discrete choice experiment methodology to value informal care tasks. A monetary value is estimated for three tasks (personal care, supervising and household tasks). The relationship between time spent on formal and informal care is also modelled and preference heterogeneity investigated using the Latent Class Model. Complementarity between supervising tasks and formal care is observed. Monetary compensation is important, with willingness to accept per hour values ranging from pound0.38 to pound0.83 for personal care, pound0.75 for supervising and pound0.31 to pound0.6 for household tasks. Heterogeneity in preferences is observed, with monetary compensation being important for younger people, but insignificant for older individuals. Such heterogeneity is important at the policy level. Values are lower than those generated by opportunity cost and replacement cost methods, perhaps because of the limited ability of revealed preference methods to capture broader aspect of utility. Differences with contingent valuation methods are also observed, suggesting future research should investigate the external validity of the different methods. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

KW - informal care

KW - valuation

KW - discrete choice experiments

KW - latent class model

KW - willingness-to-pay

KW - mixed logit

KW - health-care

KW - economic valuation

KW - stroke survivors

KW - older-people

KW - caregivers

KW - costs

KW - attributes

U2 - 10.1002/hec.1656

DO - 10.1002/hec.1656

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 930

EP - 944

JO - Health Economics

JF - Health Economics

SN - 1057-9230

IS - 8

ER -