Using doubly-labelled water to measure free-living energy expenditure: Some old things to remember and some new things to consider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The doubly-labelled water (DLW) method provides the ability to measure the energy expenditure of free-living animals based only on the injection of two isotopes in water (one of oxygen and one of hydrogen) and traditionally the collection of 2 blood samples. We review here the fundamental basis of how the method works, and highlight how the choice of the appropriate calculation equation can have a large impact on the resultant estimates, particularly in species where the difference between the isotope elimination constants is small. This knowledge is not new, but is worth reiterating given the potential for error by making the wrong choice. In particular, it is important to remember that for mammals weighing less than 5kg, and birds weighing less than 2kg, the single pool models perform best in validation studies, while in mammals above 15kg the two-pool models perform best. Above 2kg in birds and between 5 and 15kg in mammals, however, the model superiority is uncertain. Even where the choice based on body mass would appear clear, the decision may need to be tempered by species specific information regarding potential additional sources for hydrogen turnover, such as de novo lipogenesis or methanogenesis. Recent advances in the technique have included attempts to make the method less invasive by using innovative methods for dosing and sample collection. In addition, the advent of laser spectroscopy, as a replacement technology for mass spectrometry, may open up many new opportunities in the field. These potentially include direct sampling of breath in the field and tracking background isotope drift using (17)oxygen levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-9
Number of pages7
JournalComparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
Volume202
Early online date1 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Mammals
Isotopes
Energy Metabolism
Birds
Weighing
Water
Hydrogen
Oxygen
Laser spectroscopy
Lipogenesis
Mass spectrometry
Validation Studies
Animals
Blood
Sampling
Mass Spectrometry
Spectrum Analysis
Lasers
Technology
Injections

Keywords

  • doubly-labelled water
  • isotopes
  • dilution space
  • non-invasive

Cite this

@article{0fe8396edb6e4d11a64692d471975728,
title = "Using doubly-labelled water to measure free-living energy expenditure: Some old things to remember and some new things to consider",
abstract = "The doubly-labelled water (DLW) method provides the ability to measure the energy expenditure of free-living animals based only on the injection of two isotopes in water (one of oxygen and one of hydrogen) and traditionally the collection of 2 blood samples. We review here the fundamental basis of how the method works, and highlight how the choice of the appropriate calculation equation can have a large impact on the resultant estimates, particularly in species where the difference between the isotope elimination constants is small. This knowledge is not new, but is worth reiterating given the potential for error by making the wrong choice. In particular, it is important to remember that for mammals weighing less than 5kg, and birds weighing less than 2kg, the single pool models perform best in validation studies, while in mammals above 15kg the two-pool models perform best. Above 2kg in birds and between 5 and 15kg in mammals, however, the model superiority is uncertain. Even where the choice based on body mass would appear clear, the decision may need to be tempered by species specific information regarding potential additional sources for hydrogen turnover, such as de novo lipogenesis or methanogenesis. Recent advances in the technique have included attempts to make the method less invasive by using innovative methods for dosing and sample collection. In addition, the advent of laser spectroscopy, as a replacement technology for mass spectrometry, may open up many new opportunities in the field. These potentially include direct sampling of breath in the field and tracking background isotope drift using (17)oxygen levels.",
keywords = "doubly-labelled water , isotopes, dilution space, non-invasive",
author = "Speakman, {John R} and Catherine Hambly",
note = "We are grateful to all our collaborators for their interesting discussions about their applications of the DLW method, and to Peter Thomson for the technical assistance. We are particularly grateful to Alexander Reik and Fuwen Wei, our collaborators on the pony and panda studies respectively. We also thank Elena Berman, Ed Melanson, Yosuke Yamada, Dale Schoeller, Herman Pontzer, Masaki Shirai, Michael Scantlebury, Klaas Westerterp and Guy Plasqui for their insights. Elena Berman kindly provided the plot in Fig. 1. Our own work with the DLW method has been funded by various grants from the UK NERC (NE/C004159/1) and BBSRC (BB/G009953/1, BB/J020028/1). John Speakman is currently a Royal Society Wolfson Professor and a ‘1000 Talents’ Professor of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.03.017",
language = "English",
volume = "202",
pages = "3--9",
journal = "Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology",
issn = "1095-6433",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using doubly-labelled water to measure free-living energy expenditure

T2 - Some old things to remember and some new things to consider

AU - Speakman, John R

AU - Hambly, Catherine

N1 - We are grateful to all our collaborators for their interesting discussions about their applications of the DLW method, and to Peter Thomson for the technical assistance. We are particularly grateful to Alexander Reik and Fuwen Wei, our collaborators on the pony and panda studies respectively. We also thank Elena Berman, Ed Melanson, Yosuke Yamada, Dale Schoeller, Herman Pontzer, Masaki Shirai, Michael Scantlebury, Klaas Westerterp and Guy Plasqui for their insights. Elena Berman kindly provided the plot in Fig. 1. Our own work with the DLW method has been funded by various grants from the UK NERC (NE/C004159/1) and BBSRC (BB/G009953/1, BB/J020028/1). John Speakman is currently a Royal Society Wolfson Professor and a ‘1000 Talents’ Professor of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - The doubly-labelled water (DLW) method provides the ability to measure the energy expenditure of free-living animals based only on the injection of two isotopes in water (one of oxygen and one of hydrogen) and traditionally the collection of 2 blood samples. We review here the fundamental basis of how the method works, and highlight how the choice of the appropriate calculation equation can have a large impact on the resultant estimates, particularly in species where the difference between the isotope elimination constants is small. This knowledge is not new, but is worth reiterating given the potential for error by making the wrong choice. In particular, it is important to remember that for mammals weighing less than 5kg, and birds weighing less than 2kg, the single pool models perform best in validation studies, while in mammals above 15kg the two-pool models perform best. Above 2kg in birds and between 5 and 15kg in mammals, however, the model superiority is uncertain. Even where the choice based on body mass would appear clear, the decision may need to be tempered by species specific information regarding potential additional sources for hydrogen turnover, such as de novo lipogenesis or methanogenesis. Recent advances in the technique have included attempts to make the method less invasive by using innovative methods for dosing and sample collection. In addition, the advent of laser spectroscopy, as a replacement technology for mass spectrometry, may open up many new opportunities in the field. These potentially include direct sampling of breath in the field and tracking background isotope drift using (17)oxygen levels.

AB - The doubly-labelled water (DLW) method provides the ability to measure the energy expenditure of free-living animals based only on the injection of two isotopes in water (one of oxygen and one of hydrogen) and traditionally the collection of 2 blood samples. We review here the fundamental basis of how the method works, and highlight how the choice of the appropriate calculation equation can have a large impact on the resultant estimates, particularly in species where the difference between the isotope elimination constants is small. This knowledge is not new, but is worth reiterating given the potential for error by making the wrong choice. In particular, it is important to remember that for mammals weighing less than 5kg, and birds weighing less than 2kg, the single pool models perform best in validation studies, while in mammals above 15kg the two-pool models perform best. Above 2kg in birds and between 5 and 15kg in mammals, however, the model superiority is uncertain. Even where the choice based on body mass would appear clear, the decision may need to be tempered by species specific information regarding potential additional sources for hydrogen turnover, such as de novo lipogenesis or methanogenesis. Recent advances in the technique have included attempts to make the method less invasive by using innovative methods for dosing and sample collection. In addition, the advent of laser spectroscopy, as a replacement technology for mass spectrometry, may open up many new opportunities in the field. These potentially include direct sampling of breath in the field and tracking background isotope drift using (17)oxygen levels.

KW - doubly-labelled water

KW - isotopes

KW - dilution space

KW - non-invasive

U2 - 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.03.017

DO - 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.03.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 27040184

VL - 202

SP - 3

EP - 9

JO - Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology

JF - Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology

SN - 1095-6433

ER -