Using human error theory to explore the supply of non-prescription medicines from community pharmacies

Margaret Camilla Watson, Christine Margaret Bond, Marie Johnston, Kathryn Jane Mearns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The importance of theory in underpinning interventions to promote effective professional practice is gaining recognition. The Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions has assisted in promoting awareness and adoption of theory into study design. Human error theory has previously been used by high risk industries but its relevance to healthcare settings and patient safety requires further investigation. This study used this theory as a framework to explore non-prescription medicine supply from community pharmacies. The relevance to other healthcare settings and behaviours is discussed.

Method: A 25% random sample was made of 364 observed consultations for non-prescription medicines. Each of the 91 consultations was assessed by two groups: a consensus group ( stage 1) to identify common problems with the consultation process, and an expert group ( stages 2 and 3) to apply human error theory to these consultations. Paired assessors ( most of whom were pharmacists) categorised the perceived problems occurring in each consultation ( stage 1). During stage 2 paired assessors from an expert group ( comprising patient safety experts, community pharmacists and psychologists) considered whether each consultation was compliant with professional guidelines for the supply of pharmacy medicines. Each noncompliant consultation identified during stage 2 was then categorised as a slip/lapse, mistake, or violation using human error theory ( stage 3).

Results: During stage 1 most consultations (n = 75, 83%) were deemed deficient in information exchange. At stage 2, paired assessors varied in attributing non-compliance to specific error types. Where agreement was achieved, the error type most often selected was "violation'' ( n = 27, 51.9%, stage 3). Consultations involving product requests were less likely to be guideline compliant than symptom presentations (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.95, p = 0.05).

Conclusions: The large proportion of consultations classified as violations suggests that either pharmacy staff are unaware of professional guidelines and thus do not follow them ( therefore these acts would not be violations), or that they knowingly violate the guidelines due to reasons that need further research. The methods presented here could be used in other healthcare settings to explore healthcare professional behaviour and to develop strategies to promote patient safety and effective professional practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-250
Number of pages6
JournalQuality & safety in health care
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006

Keywords

  • perceptions

Cite this

Using human error theory to explore the supply of non-prescription medicines from community pharmacies. / Watson, Margaret Camilla; Bond, Christine Margaret; Johnston, Marie; Mearns, Kathryn Jane.

In: Quality & safety in health care, Vol. 15, 08.2006, p. 244-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92246d658cc14ffba36c0252d12192a9,
title = "Using human error theory to explore the supply of non-prescription medicines from community pharmacies",
abstract = "Background: The importance of theory in underpinning interventions to promote effective professional practice is gaining recognition. The Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions has assisted in promoting awareness and adoption of theory into study design. Human error theory has previously been used by high risk industries but its relevance to healthcare settings and patient safety requires further investigation. This study used this theory as a framework to explore non-prescription medicine supply from community pharmacies. The relevance to other healthcare settings and behaviours is discussed.Method: A 25{\%} random sample was made of 364 observed consultations for non-prescription medicines. Each of the 91 consultations was assessed by two groups: a consensus group ( stage 1) to identify common problems with the consultation process, and an expert group ( stages 2 and 3) to apply human error theory to these consultations. Paired assessors ( most of whom were pharmacists) categorised the perceived problems occurring in each consultation ( stage 1). During stage 2 paired assessors from an expert group ( comprising patient safety experts, community pharmacists and psychologists) considered whether each consultation was compliant with professional guidelines for the supply of pharmacy medicines. Each noncompliant consultation identified during stage 2 was then categorised as a slip/lapse, mistake, or violation using human error theory ( stage 3).Results: During stage 1 most consultations (n = 75, 83{\%}) were deemed deficient in information exchange. At stage 2, paired assessors varied in attributing non-compliance to specific error types. Where agreement was achieved, the error type most often selected was {"}violation'' ( n = 27, 51.9{\%}, stage 3). Consultations involving product requests were less likely to be guideline compliant than symptom presentations (OR 0.30, 95{\%} CI 0.10 to 0.95, p = 0.05).Conclusions: The large proportion of consultations classified as violations suggests that either pharmacy staff are unaware of professional guidelines and thus do not follow them ( therefore these acts would not be violations), or that they knowingly violate the guidelines due to reasons that need further research. The methods presented here could be used in other healthcare settings to explore healthcare professional behaviour and to develop strategies to promote patient safety and effective professional practice.",
keywords = "perceptions",
author = "Watson, {Margaret Camilla} and Bond, {Christine Margaret} and Marie Johnston and Mearns, {Kathryn Jane}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1136/qshc.2005.014035",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "244--250",
journal = "Quality & safety in health care",
issn = "1475-3898",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using human error theory to explore the supply of non-prescription medicines from community pharmacies

AU - Watson, Margaret Camilla

AU - Bond, Christine Margaret

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Mearns, Kathryn Jane

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Background: The importance of theory in underpinning interventions to promote effective professional practice is gaining recognition. The Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions has assisted in promoting awareness and adoption of theory into study design. Human error theory has previously been used by high risk industries but its relevance to healthcare settings and patient safety requires further investigation. This study used this theory as a framework to explore non-prescription medicine supply from community pharmacies. The relevance to other healthcare settings and behaviours is discussed.Method: A 25% random sample was made of 364 observed consultations for non-prescription medicines. Each of the 91 consultations was assessed by two groups: a consensus group ( stage 1) to identify common problems with the consultation process, and an expert group ( stages 2 and 3) to apply human error theory to these consultations. Paired assessors ( most of whom were pharmacists) categorised the perceived problems occurring in each consultation ( stage 1). During stage 2 paired assessors from an expert group ( comprising patient safety experts, community pharmacists and psychologists) considered whether each consultation was compliant with professional guidelines for the supply of pharmacy medicines. Each noncompliant consultation identified during stage 2 was then categorised as a slip/lapse, mistake, or violation using human error theory ( stage 3).Results: During stage 1 most consultations (n = 75, 83%) were deemed deficient in information exchange. At stage 2, paired assessors varied in attributing non-compliance to specific error types. Where agreement was achieved, the error type most often selected was "violation'' ( n = 27, 51.9%, stage 3). Consultations involving product requests were less likely to be guideline compliant than symptom presentations (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.95, p = 0.05).Conclusions: The large proportion of consultations classified as violations suggests that either pharmacy staff are unaware of professional guidelines and thus do not follow them ( therefore these acts would not be violations), or that they knowingly violate the guidelines due to reasons that need further research. The methods presented here could be used in other healthcare settings to explore healthcare professional behaviour and to develop strategies to promote patient safety and effective professional practice.

AB - Background: The importance of theory in underpinning interventions to promote effective professional practice is gaining recognition. The Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions has assisted in promoting awareness and adoption of theory into study design. Human error theory has previously been used by high risk industries but its relevance to healthcare settings and patient safety requires further investigation. This study used this theory as a framework to explore non-prescription medicine supply from community pharmacies. The relevance to other healthcare settings and behaviours is discussed.Method: A 25% random sample was made of 364 observed consultations for non-prescription medicines. Each of the 91 consultations was assessed by two groups: a consensus group ( stage 1) to identify common problems with the consultation process, and an expert group ( stages 2 and 3) to apply human error theory to these consultations. Paired assessors ( most of whom were pharmacists) categorised the perceived problems occurring in each consultation ( stage 1). During stage 2 paired assessors from an expert group ( comprising patient safety experts, community pharmacists and psychologists) considered whether each consultation was compliant with professional guidelines for the supply of pharmacy medicines. Each noncompliant consultation identified during stage 2 was then categorised as a slip/lapse, mistake, or violation using human error theory ( stage 3).Results: During stage 1 most consultations (n = 75, 83%) were deemed deficient in information exchange. At stage 2, paired assessors varied in attributing non-compliance to specific error types. Where agreement was achieved, the error type most often selected was "violation'' ( n = 27, 51.9%, stage 3). Consultations involving product requests were less likely to be guideline compliant than symptom presentations (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.95, p = 0.05).Conclusions: The large proportion of consultations classified as violations suggests that either pharmacy staff are unaware of professional guidelines and thus do not follow them ( therefore these acts would not be violations), or that they knowingly violate the guidelines due to reasons that need further research. The methods presented here could be used in other healthcare settings to explore healthcare professional behaviour and to develop strategies to promote patient safety and effective professional practice.

KW - perceptions

U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2005.014035

DO - 10.1136/qshc.2005.014035

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 244

EP - 250

JO - Quality & safety in health care

JF - Quality & safety in health care

SN - 1475-3898

ER -