Using the literature to quantify the learning curve

A case study

Jonathan Alistair Cook, Craig R Ramsay, Peter Fayers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether a literature review of a technology can allow a learning curve to be quantified.

Methods: The literature for fiberoptic intubation was searched for studies reporting information relevant to the learning curve. The Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and Science Citation index were searched. Studies that reported a procedure time were included. Data were abstracted on the three features of learning: initial level, rate of learning, and asymptote level. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.

Results: Only twenty-one studies gave explicit information concerning the previous experience of the operator(s). There were thirty-two different definitions of procedure time. From four studies of fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation, the mean starting level and time for the 10th procedure was estimated to be 133 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 113-153) and 71 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 62-79), respectively.

Conclusions: The review approach allowed learning to be quantified for our example technology Poor and insufficient reporting constrained formal statistical estimation. Standardized reporting of nondrug techniques with adequate learning curve details is needed to inform trial design and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-260
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date1 Apr 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Keywords

  • randomized controlled trials
  • learning
  • clinical competence
  • literature review
  • fiberoptic nasotracheal endoscopy
  • tracheal intubation
  • randomized trials
  • airway

Cite this

Using the literature to quantify the learning curve : A case study. / Cook, Jonathan Alistair; Ramsay, Craig R; Fayers, Peter.

In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2007, p. 255-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ccffa7f94a12485ba659c85f8f2cb947,
title = "Using the literature to quantify the learning curve: A case study",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether a literature review of a technology can allow a learning curve to be quantified.Methods: The literature for fiberoptic intubation was searched for studies reporting information relevant to the learning curve. The Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and Science Citation index were searched. Studies that reported a procedure time were included. Data were abstracted on the three features of learning: initial level, rate of learning, and asymptote level. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.Results: Only twenty-one studies gave explicit information concerning the previous experience of the operator(s). There were thirty-two different definitions of procedure time. From four studies of fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation, the mean starting level and time for the 10th procedure was estimated to be 133 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 113-153) and 71 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 62-79), respectively.Conclusions: The review approach allowed learning to be quantified for our example technology Poor and insufficient reporting constrained formal statistical estimation. Standardized reporting of nondrug techniques with adequate learning curve details is needed to inform trial design and cost-effectiveness analysis.",
keywords = "randomized controlled trials, learning, clinical competence, literature review, fiberoptic nasotracheal endoscopy, tracheal intubation, randomized trials, airway",
author = "Cook, {Jonathan Alistair} and Ramsay, {Craig R} and Peter Fayers",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1017/S0266462307070341",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "255--260",
journal = "International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care",
issn = "0266-4623",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using the literature to quantify the learning curve

T2 - A case study

AU - Cook, Jonathan Alistair

AU - Ramsay, Craig R

AU - Fayers, Peter

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether a literature review of a technology can allow a learning curve to be quantified.Methods: The literature for fiberoptic intubation was searched for studies reporting information relevant to the learning curve. The Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and Science Citation index were searched. Studies that reported a procedure time were included. Data were abstracted on the three features of learning: initial level, rate of learning, and asymptote level. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.Results: Only twenty-one studies gave explicit information concerning the previous experience of the operator(s). There were thirty-two different definitions of procedure time. From four studies of fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation, the mean starting level and time for the 10th procedure was estimated to be 133 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 113-153) and 71 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 62-79), respectively.Conclusions: The review approach allowed learning to be quantified for our example technology Poor and insufficient reporting constrained formal statistical estimation. Standardized reporting of nondrug techniques with adequate learning curve details is needed to inform trial design and cost-effectiveness analysis.

AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether a literature review of a technology can allow a learning curve to be quantified.Methods: The literature for fiberoptic intubation was searched for studies reporting information relevant to the learning curve. The Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and Science Citation index were searched. Studies that reported a procedure time were included. Data were abstracted on the three features of learning: initial level, rate of learning, and asymptote level. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.Results: Only twenty-one studies gave explicit information concerning the previous experience of the operator(s). There were thirty-two different definitions of procedure time. From four studies of fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation, the mean starting level and time for the 10th procedure was estimated to be 133 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 113-153) and 71 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 62-79), respectively.Conclusions: The review approach allowed learning to be quantified for our example technology Poor and insufficient reporting constrained formal statistical estimation. Standardized reporting of nondrug techniques with adequate learning curve details is needed to inform trial design and cost-effectiveness analysis.

KW - randomized controlled trials

KW - learning

KW - clinical competence

KW - literature review

KW - fiberoptic nasotracheal endoscopy

KW - tracheal intubation

KW - randomized trials

KW - airway

U2 - 10.1017/S0266462307070341

DO - 10.1017/S0266462307070341

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 255

EP - 260

JO - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

JF - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

SN - 0266-4623

IS - 2

ER -