Vajra-brother, Vajra-Sister

Renunciation, Individualism and the Household in Tibetan Buddhist Monasticism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article challenges two connected notions in the study of Tibetan Buddhism: that Buddhist monasticism is characterized by a pronounced move towards individualism, systematically detaching monks from relational social life; and that Tibetan Buddhist doctrines of karma represent an alternative mode of identity to those constructed within household life. By comparing the ritual practices and inheritance patterns associated with household groups in Ladakh with tantric ritual forms in local Buddhist (Gelukpa) monasteries, it is argued that they demonstrate pronounced structural similarities, centred on the shared symbolic construct of the household/temple as the source of socialized agency. An analysis of the meditative disciplines of Gelukpa monasticism is used to show how such training serves not to renounce kinship and household values, but to transform them into modes of religious authority, essential to the social position of monks (trapa) and incarnate lamas (tulku) in Tibetan Buddhism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-34
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2000

Fingerprint

renunciation
Buddhism
individualism
religious behavior
social position
kinship
doctrine
Values
Group
Renunciation
Buddhist
Sister
Brothers
Individualism
Monasticism
Household
Tibetan Buddhism
Monks

Keywords

  • kinship
  • monasticism

Cite this

@article{25521c9c050f49f2a2efe89365c18d55,
title = "Vajra-brother, Vajra-Sister : Renunciation, Individualism and the Household in Tibetan Buddhist Monasticism",
abstract = "This article challenges two connected notions in the study of Tibetan Buddhism: that Buddhist monasticism is characterized by a pronounced move towards individualism, systematically detaching monks from relational social life; and that Tibetan Buddhist doctrines of karma represent an alternative mode of identity to those constructed within household life. By comparing the ritual practices and inheritance patterns associated with household groups in Ladakh with tantric ritual forms in local Buddhist (Gelukpa) monasteries, it is argued that they demonstrate pronounced structural similarities, centred on the shared symbolic construct of the household/temple as the source of socialized agency. An analysis of the meditative disciplines of Gelukpa monasticism is used to show how such training serves not to renounce kinship and household values, but to transform them into modes of religious authority, essential to the social position of monks (trapa) and incarnate lamas (tulku) in Tibetan Buddhism.",
keywords = "kinship , monasticism",
author = "Martin Mills",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9655.t01-1-00002",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "17--34",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute",
issn = "1359-0987",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vajra-brother, Vajra-Sister

T2 - Renunciation, Individualism and the Household in Tibetan Buddhist Monasticism

AU - Mills, Martin

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - This article challenges two connected notions in the study of Tibetan Buddhism: that Buddhist monasticism is characterized by a pronounced move towards individualism, systematically detaching monks from relational social life; and that Tibetan Buddhist doctrines of karma represent an alternative mode of identity to those constructed within household life. By comparing the ritual practices and inheritance patterns associated with household groups in Ladakh with tantric ritual forms in local Buddhist (Gelukpa) monasteries, it is argued that they demonstrate pronounced structural similarities, centred on the shared symbolic construct of the household/temple as the source of socialized agency. An analysis of the meditative disciplines of Gelukpa monasticism is used to show how such training serves not to renounce kinship and household values, but to transform them into modes of religious authority, essential to the social position of monks (trapa) and incarnate lamas (tulku) in Tibetan Buddhism.

AB - This article challenges two connected notions in the study of Tibetan Buddhism: that Buddhist monasticism is characterized by a pronounced move towards individualism, systematically detaching monks from relational social life; and that Tibetan Buddhist doctrines of karma represent an alternative mode of identity to those constructed within household life. By comparing the ritual practices and inheritance patterns associated with household groups in Ladakh with tantric ritual forms in local Buddhist (Gelukpa) monasteries, it is argued that they demonstrate pronounced structural similarities, centred on the shared symbolic construct of the household/temple as the source of socialized agency. An analysis of the meditative disciplines of Gelukpa monasticism is used to show how such training serves not to renounce kinship and household values, but to transform them into modes of religious authority, essential to the social position of monks (trapa) and incarnate lamas (tulku) in Tibetan Buddhism.

KW - kinship

KW - monasticism

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9655.t01-1-00002

DO - 10.1111/1467-9655.t01-1-00002

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 17

EP - 34

JO - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

JF - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

SN - 1359-0987

IS - 1

ER -