Validating the readiness for interprofessional learning scale (RIPLS) in the postgraduate context: are health care professionals ready for IPL?

R. Reid, K. Alstaff, D. Bruce, David John McLernon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS This paper describes the process of validating the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) for use with postgraduate health care professionals.

CONTEXT The RIPLS questionnaire has proved useful in the undergraduate context, enabling tutors to assess the readiness of students to engage in interprofessional learning (IPL). With the drive in the National Health Service (NHS) to deliver health care in interprofessional teams, it seems logical to ask whether postgraduate education should, or could, be delivered successfully in interprofessional contexts. As a preliminary to undertaking an extended IPL project, the researchers tested the validity of the RIPLS tool in the postgraduate health care context.

METHOD A modified version of the RIPLS questionnaire was administered to all general practitioners, nurses, pharmacists and allied health professionals in the Dundee Local Health Care Cooperative (LHCC) (n = 799). A total of 546 staff responded (68%).

RESULTS Three factors, comprising 23 statements, emerged from the statistical analysis of the survey data, namely, teamwork and collaboration, sense of professional identity and patient-centredness. The internal consistency measure was 0.76. Analysis of variance suggested some key differences between the different professions in respect of the factors.

CONCLUSIONS The RIPLS questionnaire was validated for use in the postgraduate context, thus providing researchers with a tool for assessing health professionals' attitudes towards interprofessional learning at practice level, community health partnership level or at a national level of education and training. Significant differences between professional groups should be taken into account in designing any interprofessional learning programme.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)415-422
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Education
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Keywords

  • education, medical, graduate, methods
  • interprofessional relations
  • questionnaires, standards
  • health personnel, education
  • teaching, methods
  • Great Britain
  • education
  • students
  • future
  • guide

Cite this

Validating the readiness for interprofessional learning scale (RIPLS) in the postgraduate context: are health care professionals ready for IPL? / Reid, R.; Alstaff, K.; Bruce, D.; McLernon, David John.

In: Medical Education, Vol. 40, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 415-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee33ba55836442eab6a99c224ff8f61f,
title = "Validating the readiness for interprofessional learning scale (RIPLS) in the postgraduate context: are health care professionals ready for IPL?",
abstract = "AIMS This paper describes the process of validating the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) for use with postgraduate health care professionals.CONTEXT The RIPLS questionnaire has proved useful in the undergraduate context, enabling tutors to assess the readiness of students to engage in interprofessional learning (IPL). With the drive in the National Health Service (NHS) to deliver health care in interprofessional teams, it seems logical to ask whether postgraduate education should, or could, be delivered successfully in interprofessional contexts. As a preliminary to undertaking an extended IPL project, the researchers tested the validity of the RIPLS tool in the postgraduate health care context.METHOD A modified version of the RIPLS questionnaire was administered to all general practitioners, nurses, pharmacists and allied health professionals in the Dundee Local Health Care Cooperative (LHCC) (n = 799). A total of 546 staff responded (68{\%}).RESULTS Three factors, comprising 23 statements, emerged from the statistical analysis of the survey data, namely, teamwork and collaboration, sense of professional identity and patient-centredness. The internal consistency measure was 0.76. Analysis of variance suggested some key differences between the different professions in respect of the factors.CONCLUSIONS The RIPLS questionnaire was validated for use in the postgraduate context, thus providing researchers with a tool for assessing health professionals' attitudes towards interprofessional learning at practice level, community health partnership level or at a national level of education and training. Significant differences between professional groups should be taken into account in designing any interprofessional learning programme.",
keywords = "education, medical, graduate, methods, interprofessional relations, questionnaires, standards, health personnel, education, teaching, methods, Great Britain, education, students, future, guide",
author = "R. Reid and K. Alstaff and D. Bruce and McLernon, {David John}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02442.x",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "415--422",
journal = "Medical Education",
issn = "0308-0110",
publisher = "WILEY-BLACKWELL",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validating the readiness for interprofessional learning scale (RIPLS) in the postgraduate context: are health care professionals ready for IPL?

AU - Reid, R.

AU - Alstaff, K.

AU - Bruce, D.

AU - McLernon, David John

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - AIMS This paper describes the process of validating the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) for use with postgraduate health care professionals.CONTEXT The RIPLS questionnaire has proved useful in the undergraduate context, enabling tutors to assess the readiness of students to engage in interprofessional learning (IPL). With the drive in the National Health Service (NHS) to deliver health care in interprofessional teams, it seems logical to ask whether postgraduate education should, or could, be delivered successfully in interprofessional contexts. As a preliminary to undertaking an extended IPL project, the researchers tested the validity of the RIPLS tool in the postgraduate health care context.METHOD A modified version of the RIPLS questionnaire was administered to all general practitioners, nurses, pharmacists and allied health professionals in the Dundee Local Health Care Cooperative (LHCC) (n = 799). A total of 546 staff responded (68%).RESULTS Three factors, comprising 23 statements, emerged from the statistical analysis of the survey data, namely, teamwork and collaboration, sense of professional identity and patient-centredness. The internal consistency measure was 0.76. Analysis of variance suggested some key differences between the different professions in respect of the factors.CONCLUSIONS The RIPLS questionnaire was validated for use in the postgraduate context, thus providing researchers with a tool for assessing health professionals' attitudes towards interprofessional learning at practice level, community health partnership level or at a national level of education and training. Significant differences between professional groups should be taken into account in designing any interprofessional learning programme.

AB - AIMS This paper describes the process of validating the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) for use with postgraduate health care professionals.CONTEXT The RIPLS questionnaire has proved useful in the undergraduate context, enabling tutors to assess the readiness of students to engage in interprofessional learning (IPL). With the drive in the National Health Service (NHS) to deliver health care in interprofessional teams, it seems logical to ask whether postgraduate education should, or could, be delivered successfully in interprofessional contexts. As a preliminary to undertaking an extended IPL project, the researchers tested the validity of the RIPLS tool in the postgraduate health care context.METHOD A modified version of the RIPLS questionnaire was administered to all general practitioners, nurses, pharmacists and allied health professionals in the Dundee Local Health Care Cooperative (LHCC) (n = 799). A total of 546 staff responded (68%).RESULTS Three factors, comprising 23 statements, emerged from the statistical analysis of the survey data, namely, teamwork and collaboration, sense of professional identity and patient-centredness. The internal consistency measure was 0.76. Analysis of variance suggested some key differences between the different professions in respect of the factors.CONCLUSIONS The RIPLS questionnaire was validated for use in the postgraduate context, thus providing researchers with a tool for assessing health professionals' attitudes towards interprofessional learning at practice level, community health partnership level or at a national level of education and training. Significant differences between professional groups should be taken into account in designing any interprofessional learning programme.

KW - education, medical, graduate, methods

KW - interprofessional relations

KW - questionnaires, standards

KW - health personnel, education

KW - teaching, methods

KW - Great Britain

KW - education

KW - students

KW - future

KW - guide

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02442.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02442.x

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 415

EP - 422

JO - Medical Education

JF - Medical Education

SN - 0308-0110

IS - 5

ER -