Variability of effects of spatial climate data aggregation on regional yield simulation by crop models

H. Hoffmann (Corresponding Author), G. Zhao, L.G.J. van Bussel, A. Enders, X. Specka, C. Sosa, Jagadeesh Yeluripati, F. Tao, J. Constantin, H. Raynal, E. Teixeira, B. Grosz, L. Doro, Z. Zhao, E. Wang, C. Nendel, K.C. Kersebaum, E. Haas, R. Kiese, S. Klatt & 13 others H. Eckersten, E. Vanuytrecht, Matthias Kuhnert, E. Lewan, R. Rötter, P.P. Roggero, D. Wallach, D. Cammarano, S. Asseng, G. Krauss, S. Siebert, T. Gaiser, F. Ewert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Field-scale crop models are often applied at spatial resolutions coarser than that of the arable field. However, little is known about the response of the models to spatially aggregated climate input data and why these responses can differ across models. Depending on the model, regional yield estimates from large-scale simulations may be biased, compared to simulations with high-resolution input data. We evaluated this so-called aggregation effect for 13 crop models for the region of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany. The models were supplied with climate data of 1 km resolution and spatial aggregates of up to 100 km resolution raster. The models were used with 2 crops (winter wheat and silage maize ) and 3 production situations (potential, water limited and nitrogen-water-limited growth) to improve the understanding of errors in model simulations related to data aggregation and possible interactions with the model structure. The most important climate variables identified in determining the model-specific input data aggregation on simulated yields were mainly related to changes in radiation (wheat) and temperature (maize). Additionally, aggregation effects were systematic, regardless of the extent of the effect. Climate input data aggregation changed the mean simulated regional yield by up to 0.2 t ha−1, whereas simulated yields from single years and models differed considerably, depending on the data aggregation. This implies that large-scale crop yield simulations are robust against climate data aggregation. However, large-scale simulations can be systematically biased when being evaluated at higher temporal or spatial resolution depending on the model and its parameterization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53–69
Number of pages17
JournalClimate Research
Volume65
Early online date28 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Crops
Agglomeration
crop
climate
simulation
effect
spatial resolution
wheat
maize
Water
silage
Model structures
Parameterization
raster
crop yield
Nitrogen
parameterization
Radiation
water
nitrogen

Keywords

  • spatial aggregation effects
  • crop simulation model
  • input data
  • scaling
  • variability
  • yield simulation
  • model comparison

Cite this

Hoffmann, H., Zhao, G., van Bussel, L. G. J., Enders, A., Specka, X., Sosa, C., ... Ewert, F. (2015). Variability of effects of spatial climate data aggregation on regional yield simulation by crop models. Climate Research, 65, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01326

Variability of effects of spatial climate data aggregation on regional yield simulation by crop models. / Hoffmann, H. (Corresponding Author); Zhao, G.; van Bussel, L.G.J.; Enders, A.; Specka, X.; Sosa, C.; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh; Tao, F.; Constantin, J.; Raynal, H.; Teixeira, E.; Grosz, B.; Doro, L.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, E.; Nendel, C.; Kersebaum, K.C.; Haas, E.; Kiese, R.; Klatt, S.; Eckersten, H.; Vanuytrecht, E.; Kuhnert, Matthias; Lewan, E.; Rötter, R.; Roggero, P.P.; Wallach, D.; Cammarano, D.; Asseng, S.; Krauss, G.; Siebert, S.; Gaiser, T.; Ewert, F.

In: Climate Research, Vol. 65, 2015, p. 53–69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hoffmann, H, Zhao, G, van Bussel, LGJ, Enders, A, Specka, X, Sosa, C, Yeluripati, J, Tao, F, Constantin, J, Raynal, H, Teixeira, E, Grosz, B, Doro, L, Zhao, Z, Wang, E, Nendel, C, Kersebaum, KC, Haas, E, Kiese, R, Klatt, S, Eckersten, H, Vanuytrecht, E, Kuhnert, M, Lewan, E, Rötter, R, Roggero, PP, Wallach, D, Cammarano, D, Asseng, S, Krauss, G, Siebert, S, Gaiser, T & Ewert, F 2015, 'Variability of effects of spatial climate data aggregation on regional yield simulation by crop models', Climate Research, vol. 65, pp. 53–69. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01326
Hoffmann, H. ; Zhao, G. ; van Bussel, L.G.J. ; Enders, A. ; Specka, X. ; Sosa, C. ; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh ; Tao, F. ; Constantin, J. ; Raynal, H. ; Teixeira, E. ; Grosz, B. ; Doro, L. ; Zhao, Z. ; Wang, E. ; Nendel, C. ; Kersebaum, K.C. ; Haas, E. ; Kiese, R. ; Klatt, S. ; Eckersten, H. ; Vanuytrecht, E. ; Kuhnert, Matthias ; Lewan, E. ; Rötter, R. ; Roggero, P.P. ; Wallach, D. ; Cammarano, D. ; Asseng, S. ; Krauss, G. ; Siebert, S. ; Gaiser, T. ; Ewert, F. / Variability of effects of spatial climate data aggregation on regional yield simulation by crop models. In: Climate Research. 2015 ; Vol. 65. pp. 53–69.
@article{4a5a07c284b744298ec44acb1d0ba391,
title = "Variability of effects of spatial climate data aggregation on regional yield simulation by crop models",
abstract = "Field-scale crop models are often applied at spatial resolutions coarser than that of the arable field. However, little is known about the response of the models to spatially aggregated climate input data and why these responses can differ across models. Depending on the model, regional yield estimates from large-scale simulations may be biased, compared to simulations with high-resolution input data. We evaluated this so-called aggregation effect for 13 crop models for the region of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany. The models were supplied with climate data of 1 km resolution and spatial aggregates of up to 100 km resolution raster. The models were used with 2 crops (winter wheat and silage maize ) and 3 production situations (potential, water limited and nitrogen-water-limited growth) to improve the understanding of errors in model simulations related to data aggregation and possible interactions with the model structure. The most important climate variables identified in determining the model-specific input data aggregation on simulated yields were mainly related to changes in radiation (wheat) and temperature (maize). Additionally, aggregation effects were systematic, regardless of the extent of the effect. Climate input data aggregation changed the mean simulated regional yield by up to 0.2 t ha−1, whereas simulated yields from single years and models differed considerably, depending on the data aggregation. This implies that large-scale crop yield simulations are robust against climate data aggregation. However, large-scale simulations can be systematically biased when being evaluated at higher temporal or spatial resolution depending on the model and its parameterization.",
keywords = "spatial aggregation effects, crop simulation model, input data, scaling, variability, yield simulation, model comparison",
author = "H. Hoffmann and G. Zhao and {van Bussel}, L.G.J. and A. Enders and X. Specka and C. Sosa and Jagadeesh Yeluripati and F. Tao and J. Constantin and H. Raynal and E. Teixeira and B. Grosz and L. Doro and Z. Zhao and E. Wang and C. Nendel and K.C. Kersebaum and E. Haas and R. Kiese and S. Klatt and H. Eckersten and E. Vanuytrecht and Matthias Kuhnert and E. Lewan and R. R{\"o}tter and P.P. Roggero and D. Wallach and D. Cammarano and S. Asseng and G. Krauss and S. Siebert and T. Gaiser and F. Ewert",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3354/cr01326",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "53–69",
journal = "Climate Research",
issn = "0936-577X",
publisher = "Inter-Research",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability of effects of spatial climate data aggregation on regional yield simulation by crop models

AU - Hoffmann, H.

AU - Zhao, G.

AU - van Bussel, L.G.J.

AU - Enders, A.

AU - Specka, X.

AU - Sosa, C.

AU - Yeluripati, Jagadeesh

AU - Tao, F.

AU - Constantin, J.

AU - Raynal, H.

AU - Teixeira, E.

AU - Grosz, B.

AU - Doro, L.

AU - Zhao, Z.

AU - Wang, E.

AU - Nendel, C.

AU - Kersebaum, K.C.

AU - Haas, E.

AU - Kiese, R.

AU - Klatt, S.

AU - Eckersten, H.

AU - Vanuytrecht, E.

AU - Kuhnert, Matthias

AU - Lewan, E.

AU - Rötter, R.

AU - Roggero, P.P.

AU - Wallach, D.

AU - Cammarano, D.

AU - Asseng, S.

AU - Krauss, G.

AU - Siebert, S.

AU - Gaiser, T.

AU - Ewert, F.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Field-scale crop models are often applied at spatial resolutions coarser than that of the arable field. However, little is known about the response of the models to spatially aggregated climate input data and why these responses can differ across models. Depending on the model, regional yield estimates from large-scale simulations may be biased, compared to simulations with high-resolution input data. We evaluated this so-called aggregation effect for 13 crop models for the region of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany. The models were supplied with climate data of 1 km resolution and spatial aggregates of up to 100 km resolution raster. The models were used with 2 crops (winter wheat and silage maize ) and 3 production situations (potential, water limited and nitrogen-water-limited growth) to improve the understanding of errors in model simulations related to data aggregation and possible interactions with the model structure. The most important climate variables identified in determining the model-specific input data aggregation on simulated yields were mainly related to changes in radiation (wheat) and temperature (maize). Additionally, aggregation effects were systematic, regardless of the extent of the effect. Climate input data aggregation changed the mean simulated regional yield by up to 0.2 t ha−1, whereas simulated yields from single years and models differed considerably, depending on the data aggregation. This implies that large-scale crop yield simulations are robust against climate data aggregation. However, large-scale simulations can be systematically biased when being evaluated at higher temporal or spatial resolution depending on the model and its parameterization.

AB - Field-scale crop models are often applied at spatial resolutions coarser than that of the arable field. However, little is known about the response of the models to spatially aggregated climate input data and why these responses can differ across models. Depending on the model, regional yield estimates from large-scale simulations may be biased, compared to simulations with high-resolution input data. We evaluated this so-called aggregation effect for 13 crop models for the region of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany. The models were supplied with climate data of 1 km resolution and spatial aggregates of up to 100 km resolution raster. The models were used with 2 crops (winter wheat and silage maize ) and 3 production situations (potential, water limited and nitrogen-water-limited growth) to improve the understanding of errors in model simulations related to data aggregation and possible interactions with the model structure. The most important climate variables identified in determining the model-specific input data aggregation on simulated yields were mainly related to changes in radiation (wheat) and temperature (maize). Additionally, aggregation effects were systematic, regardless of the extent of the effect. Climate input data aggregation changed the mean simulated regional yield by up to 0.2 t ha−1, whereas simulated yields from single years and models differed considerably, depending on the data aggregation. This implies that large-scale crop yield simulations are robust against climate data aggregation. However, large-scale simulations can be systematically biased when being evaluated at higher temporal or spatial resolution depending on the model and its parameterization.

KW - spatial aggregation effects

KW - crop simulation model

KW - input data

KW - scaling

KW - variability

KW - yield simulation

KW - model comparison

U2 - 10.3354/cr01326

DO - 10.3354/cr01326

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 53

EP - 69

JO - Climate Research

JF - Climate Research

SN - 0936-577X

ER -