Variation of clinical outcomes used in glaucoma randomised controlled trials

a systematic review

Rehab Ismail, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Craig R Ramsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose In randomised clinical trials (RCTs) the selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial to the assessment of whether one intervention is better than another. The purpose of this review is to identify different clinical outcomes reported in glaucoma trials.

Methods We conducted a systematic review of glaucoma RCTs. A sample or selection of glaucoma trials were included bounded by a time frame (between 2006 and March 2012). Only studies in English language were considered. All clinical measured and reported outcomes were included. The possible variations of clinical outcomes were defined prior to data analysis. Information on reported clinical outcomes was tabulated and analysed using descriptive statistics. Other data recorded included type of intervention and glaucoma, duration of the study, defined primary outcomes, and outcomes used for sample size calculation, if nominated.

Results The search strategy identified 4323 potentially relevant abstracts. There were 315 publications retrieved, of which 233 RCTs were included. A total of 967 clinical measures were reported. There were large variations in the definitions used to describe different outcomes and their measures. Intraocular pressure was the most commonly reported outcome (used in 201 RCTs, 86%) with a total of 422 measures (44%). Safety outcomes were commonly reported in 145 RCTs (62%) whereas visual field outcomes were used in 38 RCTs (16%).

Conclusions There is a large variation in the reporting of clinical outcomes in glaucoma RCTs. This lack of standardisation may impair the ability to evaluate the evidence of glaucoma interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)464-468
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume98
Issue number4
Early online date13 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Glaucoma
Randomized Controlled Trials
Aptitude
Visual Fields
Intraocular Pressure
Sample Size
Publications
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Safety

Keywords

  • outcomes
  • heterogeneity
  • trials
  • measures
  • glaucoma

Cite this

Variation of clinical outcomes used in glaucoma randomised controlled trials : a systematic review. / Ismail, Rehab; Azuara-Blanco, Augusto; Ramsay, Craig R.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 98, No. 4, 04.2014, p. 464-468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{66395d3de7294ee895e3b39688672e2e,
title = "Variation of clinical outcomes used in glaucoma randomised controlled trials: a systematic review",
abstract = "Purpose In randomised clinical trials (RCTs) the selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial to the assessment of whether one intervention is better than another. The purpose of this review is to identify different clinical outcomes reported in glaucoma trials.Methods We conducted a systematic review of glaucoma RCTs. A sample or selection of glaucoma trials were included bounded by a time frame (between 2006 and March 2012). Only studies in English language were considered. All clinical measured and reported outcomes were included. The possible variations of clinical outcomes were defined prior to data analysis. Information on reported clinical outcomes was tabulated and analysed using descriptive statistics. Other data recorded included type of intervention and glaucoma, duration of the study, defined primary outcomes, and outcomes used for sample size calculation, if nominated.Results The search strategy identified 4323 potentially relevant abstracts. There were 315 publications retrieved, of which 233 RCTs were included. A total of 967 clinical measures were reported. There were large variations in the definitions used to describe different outcomes and their measures. Intraocular pressure was the most commonly reported outcome (used in 201 RCTs, 86{\%}) with a total of 422 measures (44{\%}). Safety outcomes were commonly reported in 145 RCTs (62{\%}) whereas visual field outcomes were used in 38 RCTs (16{\%}).Conclusions There is a large variation in the reporting of clinical outcomes in glaucoma RCTs. This lack of standardisation may impair the ability to evaluate the evidence of glaucoma interventions.",
keywords = "outcomes, heterogeneity, trials, measures, glaucoma",
author = "Rehab Ismail and Augusto Azuara-Blanco and Ramsay, {Craig R}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304323",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "464--468",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation of clinical outcomes used in glaucoma randomised controlled trials

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Ismail, Rehab

AU - Azuara-Blanco, Augusto

AU - Ramsay, Craig R

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Purpose In randomised clinical trials (RCTs) the selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial to the assessment of whether one intervention is better than another. The purpose of this review is to identify different clinical outcomes reported in glaucoma trials.Methods We conducted a systematic review of glaucoma RCTs. A sample or selection of glaucoma trials were included bounded by a time frame (between 2006 and March 2012). Only studies in English language were considered. All clinical measured and reported outcomes were included. The possible variations of clinical outcomes were defined prior to data analysis. Information on reported clinical outcomes was tabulated and analysed using descriptive statistics. Other data recorded included type of intervention and glaucoma, duration of the study, defined primary outcomes, and outcomes used for sample size calculation, if nominated.Results The search strategy identified 4323 potentially relevant abstracts. There were 315 publications retrieved, of which 233 RCTs were included. A total of 967 clinical measures were reported. There were large variations in the definitions used to describe different outcomes and their measures. Intraocular pressure was the most commonly reported outcome (used in 201 RCTs, 86%) with a total of 422 measures (44%). Safety outcomes were commonly reported in 145 RCTs (62%) whereas visual field outcomes were used in 38 RCTs (16%).Conclusions There is a large variation in the reporting of clinical outcomes in glaucoma RCTs. This lack of standardisation may impair the ability to evaluate the evidence of glaucoma interventions.

AB - Purpose In randomised clinical trials (RCTs) the selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial to the assessment of whether one intervention is better than another. The purpose of this review is to identify different clinical outcomes reported in glaucoma trials.Methods We conducted a systematic review of glaucoma RCTs. A sample or selection of glaucoma trials were included bounded by a time frame (between 2006 and March 2012). Only studies in English language were considered. All clinical measured and reported outcomes were included. The possible variations of clinical outcomes were defined prior to data analysis. Information on reported clinical outcomes was tabulated and analysed using descriptive statistics. Other data recorded included type of intervention and glaucoma, duration of the study, defined primary outcomes, and outcomes used for sample size calculation, if nominated.Results The search strategy identified 4323 potentially relevant abstracts. There were 315 publications retrieved, of which 233 RCTs were included. A total of 967 clinical measures were reported. There were large variations in the definitions used to describe different outcomes and their measures. Intraocular pressure was the most commonly reported outcome (used in 201 RCTs, 86%) with a total of 422 measures (44%). Safety outcomes were commonly reported in 145 RCTs (62%) whereas visual field outcomes were used in 38 RCTs (16%).Conclusions There is a large variation in the reporting of clinical outcomes in glaucoma RCTs. This lack of standardisation may impair the ability to evaluate the evidence of glaucoma interventions.

KW - outcomes

KW - heterogeneity

KW - trials

KW - measures

KW - glaucoma

U2 - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304323

DO - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304323

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 464

EP - 468

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 4

ER -