Verbalization and problem solving: insight and spatial factors

Ken Gilhooly, Evie Fioratou, Nigel Henretty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two groups of participants attempted eight examples of each of four different problem types formed by combining insight versus non-insight and verbal versus spatial factors. The groups were given different verbalization instructions viz., Silent (N=40) or Direct Concurrent (N=40). There were significant differences between insight and non-insight tasks and between spatial and verbal tasks in terms of solution rates and latencies. Significant interactions between the verbal versus spatial factor and verbalization condition on solution rates and latencies reflected a greater (negative) effect of verbalizing on spatial as against verbal problems. However, no significant interactions of the insight versus non-insight factor with verbalization condition on solution rates or latencies were found. These results favoured the `business as usual' view of insight problem solving as against the `special process' view which predicted larger effects of verbalization for insight problems as against non-insight problems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-93
Number of pages13
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Volume101
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010

Cite this

Verbalization and problem solving : insight and spatial factors . / Gilhooly, Ken; Fioratou, Evie; Henretty, Nigel.

In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 101, No. 1, 02.2010, p. 81-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gilhooly, Ken ; Fioratou, Evie ; Henretty, Nigel. / Verbalization and problem solving : insight and spatial factors . In: British Journal of Psychology. 2010 ; Vol. 101, No. 1. pp. 81-93.
@article{df0370c02f8441a283cc93466b8a7dca,
title = "Verbalization and problem solving: insight and spatial factors",
abstract = "Two groups of participants attempted eight examples of each of four different problem types formed by combining insight versus non-insight and verbal versus spatial factors. The groups were given different verbalization instructions viz., Silent (N=40) or Direct Concurrent (N=40). There were significant differences between insight and non-insight tasks and between spatial and verbal tasks in terms of solution rates and latencies. Significant interactions between the verbal versus spatial factor and verbalization condition on solution rates and latencies reflected a greater (negative) effect of verbalizing on spatial as against verbal problems. However, no significant interactions of the insight versus non-insight factor with verbalization condition on solution rates or latencies were found. These results favoured the `business as usual' view of insight problem solving as against the `special process' view which predicted larger effects of verbalization for insight problems as against non-insight problems.",
author = "Ken Gilhooly and Evie Fioratou and Nigel Henretty",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1348/000712609X422656",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "81--93",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Verbalization and problem solving

T2 - insight and spatial factors

AU - Gilhooly, Ken

AU - Fioratou, Evie

AU - Henretty, Nigel

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Two groups of participants attempted eight examples of each of four different problem types formed by combining insight versus non-insight and verbal versus spatial factors. The groups were given different verbalization instructions viz., Silent (N=40) or Direct Concurrent (N=40). There were significant differences between insight and non-insight tasks and between spatial and verbal tasks in terms of solution rates and latencies. Significant interactions between the verbal versus spatial factor and verbalization condition on solution rates and latencies reflected a greater (negative) effect of verbalizing on spatial as against verbal problems. However, no significant interactions of the insight versus non-insight factor with verbalization condition on solution rates or latencies were found. These results favoured the `business as usual' view of insight problem solving as against the `special process' view which predicted larger effects of verbalization for insight problems as against non-insight problems.

AB - Two groups of participants attempted eight examples of each of four different problem types formed by combining insight versus non-insight and verbal versus spatial factors. The groups were given different verbalization instructions viz., Silent (N=40) or Direct Concurrent (N=40). There were significant differences between insight and non-insight tasks and between spatial and verbal tasks in terms of solution rates and latencies. Significant interactions between the verbal versus spatial factor and verbalization condition on solution rates and latencies reflected a greater (negative) effect of verbalizing on spatial as against verbal problems. However, no significant interactions of the insight versus non-insight factor with verbalization condition on solution rates or latencies were found. These results favoured the `business as usual' view of insight problem solving as against the `special process' view which predicted larger effects of verbalization for insight problems as against non-insight problems.

U2 - 10.1348/000712609X422656

DO - 10.1348/000712609X422656

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 81

EP - 93

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 1

ER -