Victimhood Status and Public Attitudes Towards Post-conflict Agreements

Northern Ireland as a Case Study

John D. Brewer, Bernadette C Hayes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rights and needs of victims have become an increasingly controversial issue in post-conflict societies. Yet to date, the views of victims concerning the new political arrangements in post-conflict settlements remain unexplored. Mindful of this omission and using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article investigates the relationship between victimhood status and attitudes towards the new political arrangements of devolved government in Northern Ireland, namely the Assembly and its power-sharing Executive. Based on the 2010 Northern Ireland Election Survey, the results suggest that individual victims – those who had directly and indirectly experienced violent instances and perceived themselves as victims – are notably more supportive of these new political arrangements and this relationship remains regardless of whether Protestants or Catholics are considered. A key factor in accounting for this phenomenon is their greater endorsement of its systems of governance, or underlying consociational principles of inclusion and decision making, as well as a positive view of its current political leaders. The Northern Ireland evidence suggests that victims can act as ‘moral beacons’, providing a positive and inclusive force for political accommodation and societal reconciliation in societies emerging from conflict.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-461
Number of pages20
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume61
Issue number2
Early online date14 Sep 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

society
reconciliation
accommodation
election
inclusion
leader
governance
decision making
evidence

Keywords

  • victims
  • Northern Ireland
  • post conflict agreements
  • consociationalism

Cite this

Victimhood Status and Public Attitudes Towards Post-conflict Agreements : Northern Ireland as a Case Study. / Brewer, John D.; Hayes, Bernadette C.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 61, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 442-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{03c43518049c48819a999fcc36b56643,
title = "Victimhood Status and Public Attitudes Towards Post-conflict Agreements: Northern Ireland as a Case Study",
abstract = "The rights and needs of victims have become an increasingly controversial issue in post-conflict societies. Yet to date, the views of victims concerning the new political arrangements in post-conflict settlements remain unexplored. Mindful of this omission and using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article investigates the relationship between victimhood status and attitudes towards the new political arrangements of devolved government in Northern Ireland, namely the Assembly and its power-sharing Executive. Based on the 2010 Northern Ireland Election Survey, the results suggest that individual victims – those who had directly and indirectly experienced violent instances and perceived themselves as victims – are notably more supportive of these new political arrangements and this relationship remains regardless of whether Protestants or Catholics are considered. A key factor in accounting for this phenomenon is their greater endorsement of its systems of governance, or underlying consociational principles of inclusion and decision making, as well as a positive view of its current political leaders. The Northern Ireland evidence suggests that victims can act as ‘moral beacons’, providing a positive and inclusive force for political accommodation and societal reconciliation in societies emerging from conflict.",
keywords = "victims , Northern Ireland, post conflict agreements, consociationalism",
author = "Brewer, {John D.} and Hayes, {Bernadette C}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00973.x",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "442--461",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Victimhood Status and Public Attitudes Towards Post-conflict Agreements

T2 - Northern Ireland as a Case Study

AU - Brewer, John D.

AU - Hayes, Bernadette C

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - The rights and needs of victims have become an increasingly controversial issue in post-conflict societies. Yet to date, the views of victims concerning the new political arrangements in post-conflict settlements remain unexplored. Mindful of this omission and using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article investigates the relationship between victimhood status and attitudes towards the new political arrangements of devolved government in Northern Ireland, namely the Assembly and its power-sharing Executive. Based on the 2010 Northern Ireland Election Survey, the results suggest that individual victims – those who had directly and indirectly experienced violent instances and perceived themselves as victims – are notably more supportive of these new political arrangements and this relationship remains regardless of whether Protestants or Catholics are considered. A key factor in accounting for this phenomenon is their greater endorsement of its systems of governance, or underlying consociational principles of inclusion and decision making, as well as a positive view of its current political leaders. The Northern Ireland evidence suggests that victims can act as ‘moral beacons’, providing a positive and inclusive force for political accommodation and societal reconciliation in societies emerging from conflict.

AB - The rights and needs of victims have become an increasingly controversial issue in post-conflict societies. Yet to date, the views of victims concerning the new political arrangements in post-conflict settlements remain unexplored. Mindful of this omission and using Northern Ireland as a case study, this article investigates the relationship between victimhood status and attitudes towards the new political arrangements of devolved government in Northern Ireland, namely the Assembly and its power-sharing Executive. Based on the 2010 Northern Ireland Election Survey, the results suggest that individual victims – those who had directly and indirectly experienced violent instances and perceived themselves as victims – are notably more supportive of these new political arrangements and this relationship remains regardless of whether Protestants or Catholics are considered. A key factor in accounting for this phenomenon is their greater endorsement of its systems of governance, or underlying consociational principles of inclusion and decision making, as well as a positive view of its current political leaders. The Northern Ireland evidence suggests that victims can act as ‘moral beacons’, providing a positive and inclusive force for political accommodation and societal reconciliation in societies emerging from conflict.

KW - victims

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - post conflict agreements

KW - consociationalism

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00973.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00973.x

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 442

EP - 461

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 2

ER -