Victorian saurians: The linguistic prehistory of the modern dinosaur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Much has been written about the meaning of ‘dinosaurs’ in Victorian culture. However, during this period extinct reptiles did not fit neatly into a single ‘scientific’ category. The word ‘dinosaur’, which embraced only three of the many extinct reptiles known in 1842 when it was coined, was not in common vernacular use until the end of the century. In the Victorian period, animals we now call ‘dinosaurs’ were widely perceived as part of a more nebulous group of extinct reptiles, including marine saurians and pterodactyls. They were referred to using various combinations of other, often non-scientific, signifiers, and their significance was consequently open to widely divergent interpretations. As a preliminary move towards understanding the significance of extinct reptiles for the Victorians, this paper will survey how they were constructed semantically both among scientific practitioners and wider constituencies, and will survey the range of associations which eventually helped to crystallize the ‘dinosaur’ as a cultural category at the end of the period.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)492-504
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Victorian Culture
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

prehistory
linguistics
animal
interpretation
Group
Victorian Era
Dinosaurs
Prehistory

Cite this

Victorian saurians : The linguistic prehistory of the modern dinosaur. / O'Connor, Ralph James.

In: Journal of Victorian Culture, Vol. 17, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 492-504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7529a6aa6fdc47a79405a73662a8e7d8,
title = "Victorian saurians: The linguistic prehistory of the modern dinosaur",
abstract = "Much has been written about the meaning of ‘dinosaurs’ in Victorian culture. However, during this period extinct reptiles did not fit neatly into a single ‘scientific’ category. The word ‘dinosaur’, which embraced only three of the many extinct reptiles known in 1842 when it was coined, was not in common vernacular use until the end of the century. In the Victorian period, animals we now call ‘dinosaurs’ were widely perceived as part of a more nebulous group of extinct reptiles, including marine saurians and pterodactyls. They were referred to using various combinations of other, often non-scientific, signifiers, and their significance was consequently open to widely divergent interpretations. As a preliminary move towards understanding the significance of extinct reptiles for the Victorians, this paper will survey how they were constructed semantically both among scientific practitioners and wider constituencies, and will survey the range of associations which eventually helped to crystallize the ‘dinosaur’ as a cultural category at the end of the period.",
author = "O'Connor, {Ralph James}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/13555502.2012.738896",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "492--504",
journal = "Journal of Victorian Culture",
issn = "1355-5502",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Victorian saurians

T2 - The linguistic prehistory of the modern dinosaur

AU - O'Connor, Ralph James

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Much has been written about the meaning of ‘dinosaurs’ in Victorian culture. However, during this period extinct reptiles did not fit neatly into a single ‘scientific’ category. The word ‘dinosaur’, which embraced only three of the many extinct reptiles known in 1842 when it was coined, was not in common vernacular use until the end of the century. In the Victorian period, animals we now call ‘dinosaurs’ were widely perceived as part of a more nebulous group of extinct reptiles, including marine saurians and pterodactyls. They were referred to using various combinations of other, often non-scientific, signifiers, and their significance was consequently open to widely divergent interpretations. As a preliminary move towards understanding the significance of extinct reptiles for the Victorians, this paper will survey how they were constructed semantically both among scientific practitioners and wider constituencies, and will survey the range of associations which eventually helped to crystallize the ‘dinosaur’ as a cultural category at the end of the period.

AB - Much has been written about the meaning of ‘dinosaurs’ in Victorian culture. However, during this period extinct reptiles did not fit neatly into a single ‘scientific’ category. The word ‘dinosaur’, which embraced only three of the many extinct reptiles known in 1842 when it was coined, was not in common vernacular use until the end of the century. In the Victorian period, animals we now call ‘dinosaurs’ were widely perceived as part of a more nebulous group of extinct reptiles, including marine saurians and pterodactyls. They were referred to using various combinations of other, often non-scientific, signifiers, and their significance was consequently open to widely divergent interpretations. As a preliminary move towards understanding the significance of extinct reptiles for the Victorians, this paper will survey how they were constructed semantically both among scientific practitioners and wider constituencies, and will survey the range of associations which eventually helped to crystallize the ‘dinosaur’ as a cultural category at the end of the period.

U2 - 10.1080/13555502.2012.738896

DO - 10.1080/13555502.2012.738896

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 492

EP - 504

JO - Journal of Victorian Culture

JF - Journal of Victorian Culture

SN - 1355-5502

IS - 4

ER -