Views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing

Katie McLure, Johnson George, Lesley Diack, Christine Bond, Scott Cunningham, Derek Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Under UK legislation, suitably qualified non-medical professionals can practise as prescribers. Few studies have explored the views of the general public towards non-medical prescribing. Objective The aim was to explore the views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing. Setting General community in Scotland. Method A pre-piloted survey was mailed to a random sample of 5,000 members of the general public in Scotland. In addition to the items on awareness of and attitudes towards non-medical prescribing, respondents were asked to ‘give any other comments, issues or concerns you have in relation to health professionals other than doctors prescribing.’ Responses were subjected to content analysis. Main outcome measures Key themes identified from content analysis. Results The overall questionnaire response rate was 37.1 % (n = 1,855) of which 27.2 % (n = 505) provided comments. Most were directly related to pharmacist prescribing (n = 312) while others referred to non-medical prescribers generically (n = 172) or other healthcare professionals (n = 79). Nine themes were identified: perception of knowledge and training; support for a limited range of non-medical prescribing; access to medical records; motivation and convenience; confidence, faith and trust; privacy and confidentiality; risks, controls and continuity of care; supervision and conflict of interest; communication and cooperation. Conclusions The findings identify support for non-medical prescribing but indicate the need for non-medical prescribers to engage more with the general public. The comments also provide insight into the challenges for non-medical prescribers, as they strive to fulfil their extended healthcare roles.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)704-710
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Volume35
Issue number5
Early online date22 May 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Health
Scotland
Communication
Delivery of Health Care
Conflict of Interest
Continuity of Patient Care
Professional Practice
Privacy
Confidentiality
Legislation
Pharmacists
Medical Records
Motivation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • allied health professional
  • governance
  • pharmacist
  • public opinion
  • Scotland

Cite this

Views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing. / McLure, Katie; George, Johnson; Diack, Lesley; Bond, Christine ; Cunningham, Scott; Stewart, Derek .

In: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Vol. 35, No. 5, 10.2013, p. 704-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McLure, Katie ; George, Johnson ; Diack, Lesley ; Bond, Christine ; Cunningham, Scott ; Stewart, Derek . / Views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing. In: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 2013 ; Vol. 35, No. 5. pp. 704-710.
@article{73cc016332ca41b7998e3122893c1332,
title = "Views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing",
abstract = "Background Under UK legislation, suitably qualified non-medical professionals can practise as prescribers. Few studies have explored the views of the general public towards non-medical prescribing. Objective The aim was to explore the views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing. Setting General community in Scotland. Method A pre-piloted survey was mailed to a random sample of 5,000 members of the general public in Scotland. In addition to the items on awareness of and attitudes towards non-medical prescribing, respondents were asked to ‘give any other comments, issues or concerns you have in relation to health professionals other than doctors prescribing.’ Responses were subjected to content analysis. Main outcome measures Key themes identified from content analysis. Results The overall questionnaire response rate was 37.1 {\%} (n = 1,855) of which 27.2 {\%} (n = 505) provided comments. Most were directly related to pharmacist prescribing (n = 312) while others referred to non-medical prescribers generically (n = 172) or other healthcare professionals (n = 79). Nine themes were identified: perception of knowledge and training; support for a limited range of non-medical prescribing; access to medical records; motivation and convenience; confidence, faith and trust; privacy and confidentiality; risks, controls and continuity of care; supervision and conflict of interest; communication and cooperation. Conclusions The findings identify support for non-medical prescribing but indicate the need for non-medical prescribers to engage more with the general public. The comments also provide insight into the challenges for non-medical prescribers, as they strive to fulfil their extended healthcare roles.",
keywords = "allied health professional , governance, pharmacist, public opinion, Scotland",
author = "Katie McLure and Johnson George and Lesley Diack and Christine Bond and Scott Cunningham and Derek Stewart",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11096-013-9792-x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "704--710",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy",
issn = "2210-7703",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing

AU - McLure, Katie

AU - George, Johnson

AU - Diack, Lesley

AU - Bond, Christine

AU - Cunningham, Scott

AU - Stewart, Derek

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Background Under UK legislation, suitably qualified non-medical professionals can practise as prescribers. Few studies have explored the views of the general public towards non-medical prescribing. Objective The aim was to explore the views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing. Setting General community in Scotland. Method A pre-piloted survey was mailed to a random sample of 5,000 members of the general public in Scotland. In addition to the items on awareness of and attitudes towards non-medical prescribing, respondents were asked to ‘give any other comments, issues or concerns you have in relation to health professionals other than doctors prescribing.’ Responses were subjected to content analysis. Main outcome measures Key themes identified from content analysis. Results The overall questionnaire response rate was 37.1 % (n = 1,855) of which 27.2 % (n = 505) provided comments. Most were directly related to pharmacist prescribing (n = 312) while others referred to non-medical prescribers generically (n = 172) or other healthcare professionals (n = 79). Nine themes were identified: perception of knowledge and training; support for a limited range of non-medical prescribing; access to medical records; motivation and convenience; confidence, faith and trust; privacy and confidentiality; risks, controls and continuity of care; supervision and conflict of interest; communication and cooperation. Conclusions The findings identify support for non-medical prescribing but indicate the need for non-medical prescribers to engage more with the general public. The comments also provide insight into the challenges for non-medical prescribers, as they strive to fulfil their extended healthcare roles.

AB - Background Under UK legislation, suitably qualified non-medical professionals can practise as prescribers. Few studies have explored the views of the general public towards non-medical prescribing. Objective The aim was to explore the views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing. Setting General community in Scotland. Method A pre-piloted survey was mailed to a random sample of 5,000 members of the general public in Scotland. In addition to the items on awareness of and attitudes towards non-medical prescribing, respondents were asked to ‘give any other comments, issues or concerns you have in relation to health professionals other than doctors prescribing.’ Responses were subjected to content analysis. Main outcome measures Key themes identified from content analysis. Results The overall questionnaire response rate was 37.1 % (n = 1,855) of which 27.2 % (n = 505) provided comments. Most were directly related to pharmacist prescribing (n = 312) while others referred to non-medical prescribers generically (n = 172) or other healthcare professionals (n = 79). Nine themes were identified: perception of knowledge and training; support for a limited range of non-medical prescribing; access to medical records; motivation and convenience; confidence, faith and trust; privacy and confidentiality; risks, controls and continuity of care; supervision and conflict of interest; communication and cooperation. Conclusions The findings identify support for non-medical prescribing but indicate the need for non-medical prescribers to engage more with the general public. The comments also provide insight into the challenges for non-medical prescribers, as they strive to fulfil their extended healthcare roles.

KW - allied health professional

KW - governance

KW - pharmacist

KW - public opinion

KW - Scotland

U2 - 10.1007/s11096-013-9792-x

DO - 10.1007/s11096-013-9792-x

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 704

EP - 710

JO - International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

JF - International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

SN - 2210-7703

IS - 5

ER -