Voice, Discourse and Transformation

Enabling Learning for the Achieving of Social Change

Karen Ann McArdle, Sue Mansfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes that transformative social change by community educators is not achievable unless they can challenge the social, economic and political discourses that have an impact on the practice of community education. As educators of community workers, the authors regard the development of voice to be a prerequisite for the challenging of discourse. Voice provides the foundations for understanding what it means to be who one is and how change is needed and possible. Voice, we argue, is inseparable from criticality and we draw on Brookfield's (2000) four traditions of criticality, in particular pragmatic constructivism, to link our understandings of voice. It is important, we conclude, to allow students to develop distinctive voices so that they become critically reflexive professionals who can work towards transformative social change. Shared and contrasting views on the development of voice are presented in a dialogical format to reflect the sometimes shared and sometimes contrasting voices of the two authors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)485-498
Number of pages14
JournalDiscourse : studies in the cultural politics of education
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

social change
discourse
educator
learning
community
constructivism
social economics
pragmatics
worker
education
student

Cite this

Voice, Discourse and Transformation : Enabling Learning for the Achieving of Social Change. / McArdle, Karen Ann; Mansfield, Sue.

In: Discourse : studies in the cultural politics of education , Vol. 28, No. 4, 2007, p. 485-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f940da4bf9c40d0b5f41ed801e5d284,
title = "Voice, Discourse and Transformation: Enabling Learning for the Achieving of Social Change",
abstract = "This paper proposes that transformative social change by community educators is not achievable unless they can challenge the social, economic and political discourses that have an impact on the practice of community education. As educators of community workers, the authors regard the development of voice to be a prerequisite for the challenging of discourse. Voice provides the foundations for understanding what it means to be who one is and how change is needed and possible. Voice, we argue, is inseparable from criticality and we draw on Brookfield's (2000) four traditions of criticality, in particular pragmatic constructivism, to link our understandings of voice. It is important, we conclude, to allow students to develop distinctive voices so that they become critically reflexive professionals who can work towards transformative social change. Shared and contrasting views on the development of voice are presented in a dialogical format to reflect the sometimes shared and sometimes contrasting voices of the two authors.",
author = "McArdle, {Karen Ann} and Sue Mansfield",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1080/01596300701625222",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "485--498",
journal = "Discourse : studies in the cultural politics of education",
issn = "0159-6306",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voice, Discourse and Transformation

T2 - Enabling Learning for the Achieving of Social Change

AU - McArdle, Karen Ann

AU - Mansfield, Sue

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper proposes that transformative social change by community educators is not achievable unless they can challenge the social, economic and political discourses that have an impact on the practice of community education. As educators of community workers, the authors regard the development of voice to be a prerequisite for the challenging of discourse. Voice provides the foundations for understanding what it means to be who one is and how change is needed and possible. Voice, we argue, is inseparable from criticality and we draw on Brookfield's (2000) four traditions of criticality, in particular pragmatic constructivism, to link our understandings of voice. It is important, we conclude, to allow students to develop distinctive voices so that they become critically reflexive professionals who can work towards transformative social change. Shared and contrasting views on the development of voice are presented in a dialogical format to reflect the sometimes shared and sometimes contrasting voices of the two authors.

AB - This paper proposes that transformative social change by community educators is not achievable unless they can challenge the social, economic and political discourses that have an impact on the practice of community education. As educators of community workers, the authors regard the development of voice to be a prerequisite for the challenging of discourse. Voice provides the foundations for understanding what it means to be who one is and how change is needed and possible. Voice, we argue, is inseparable from criticality and we draw on Brookfield's (2000) four traditions of criticality, in particular pragmatic constructivism, to link our understandings of voice. It is important, we conclude, to allow students to develop distinctive voices so that they become critically reflexive professionals who can work towards transformative social change. Shared and contrasting views on the development of voice are presented in a dialogical format to reflect the sometimes shared and sometimes contrasting voices of the two authors.

U2 - 10.1080/01596300701625222

DO - 10.1080/01596300701625222

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 485

EP - 498

JO - Discourse : studies in the cultural politics of education

JF - Discourse : studies in the cultural politics of education

SN - 0159-6306

IS - 4

ER -