WAIS-R performance following closed-head injury: A comparison of the clinical utility of summary IQs, factor scores, and subtest scatter indices

John Robertson Crawford, David Johnson, B Mychalkiw, Joe Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

WAIS-R performance can be analyzed at the level of the IQs. factor scores, or subtests. This study examined the relative utility of such analyses in a closed-head-injured (CHI) sample (n = 233). Comparison of the sample with matched controls (n = 117) indicated that factor scores may be the most appropriate level of analysis in clinical practice. This conclusion was supported by a series of discriminant function analyses performed on the WAIS-R scores of the CHI sample and 356 healthy controls drawn from the general population. Factor scores achieved a significantly higher classification accuracy than IQs or indices of subtest scatter (all ps < .001). Combining the scatter indices with the composite measures (i.e.. IQs or factor scores) did not produce a significant improvement in discrimination over that achieved by the composites alone. Counter to the assumptions underlying the clinical analysis of subtest profiles, CHI participants failed to exhibit significantly greater intraindividual subtest variability in their subtest profiles than the matched control sample.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-355
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1997

Keywords

  • HEALTHY UK SAMPLE
  • PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
  • INDEX

Cite this

WAIS-R performance following closed-head injury: A comparison of the clinical utility of summary IQs, factor scores, and subtest scatter indices. / Crawford, John Robertson; Johnson, David; Mychalkiw, B ; Moore, Joe.

In: Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 11, No. 4, 11.1997, p. 345-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{daae7973d52d418ba8e34d97f1d61faf,
title = "WAIS-R performance following closed-head injury: A comparison of the clinical utility of summary IQs, factor scores, and subtest scatter indices",
abstract = "WAIS-R performance can be analyzed at the level of the IQs. factor scores, or subtests. This study examined the relative utility of such analyses in a closed-head-injured (CHI) sample (n = 233). Comparison of the sample with matched controls (n = 117) indicated that factor scores may be the most appropriate level of analysis in clinical practice. This conclusion was supported by a series of discriminant function analyses performed on the WAIS-R scores of the CHI sample and 356 healthy controls drawn from the general population. Factor scores achieved a significantly higher classification accuracy than IQs or indices of subtest scatter (all ps < .001). Combining the scatter indices with the composite measures (i.e.. IQs or factor scores) did not produce a significant improvement in discrimination over that achieved by the composites alone. Counter to the assumptions underlying the clinical analysis of subtest profiles, CHI participants failed to exhibit significantly greater intraindividual subtest variability in their subtest profiles than the matched control sample.",
keywords = "HEALTHY UK SAMPLE, PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES, INDEX",
author = "Crawford, {John Robertson} and David Johnson and B Mychalkiw and Joe Moore",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/13854049708400463",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "345--355",
journal = "Clinical Neuropsychologist",
issn = "1385-4046",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - WAIS-R performance following closed-head injury: A comparison of the clinical utility of summary IQs, factor scores, and subtest scatter indices

AU - Crawford, John Robertson

AU - Johnson, David

AU - Mychalkiw, B

AU - Moore, Joe

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - WAIS-R performance can be analyzed at the level of the IQs. factor scores, or subtests. This study examined the relative utility of such analyses in a closed-head-injured (CHI) sample (n = 233). Comparison of the sample with matched controls (n = 117) indicated that factor scores may be the most appropriate level of analysis in clinical practice. This conclusion was supported by a series of discriminant function analyses performed on the WAIS-R scores of the CHI sample and 356 healthy controls drawn from the general population. Factor scores achieved a significantly higher classification accuracy than IQs or indices of subtest scatter (all ps < .001). Combining the scatter indices with the composite measures (i.e.. IQs or factor scores) did not produce a significant improvement in discrimination over that achieved by the composites alone. Counter to the assumptions underlying the clinical analysis of subtest profiles, CHI participants failed to exhibit significantly greater intraindividual subtest variability in their subtest profiles than the matched control sample.

AB - WAIS-R performance can be analyzed at the level of the IQs. factor scores, or subtests. This study examined the relative utility of such analyses in a closed-head-injured (CHI) sample (n = 233). Comparison of the sample with matched controls (n = 117) indicated that factor scores may be the most appropriate level of analysis in clinical practice. This conclusion was supported by a series of discriminant function analyses performed on the WAIS-R scores of the CHI sample and 356 healthy controls drawn from the general population. Factor scores achieved a significantly higher classification accuracy than IQs or indices of subtest scatter (all ps < .001). Combining the scatter indices with the composite measures (i.e.. IQs or factor scores) did not produce a significant improvement in discrimination over that achieved by the composites alone. Counter to the assumptions underlying the clinical analysis of subtest profiles, CHI participants failed to exhibit significantly greater intraindividual subtest variability in their subtest profiles than the matched control sample.

KW - HEALTHY UK SAMPLE

KW - PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES

KW - INDEX

U2 - 10.1080/13854049708400463

DO - 10.1080/13854049708400463

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 345

EP - 355

JO - Clinical Neuropsychologist

JF - Clinical Neuropsychologist

SN - 1385-4046

IS - 4

ER -