Was the Indosinian orogeny a Triassic mountain building or a thermotectonic reactivation event?

Andrew Carter, Peter D. Clift

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The underlying cause of Indosinian thermotectonism remains unclear, in part because the term has also been adopted to explain Triassic orogenesis across southern China. This paper puts forward the case that use of the term Indosinian should be confined to Vietnam where deformation is linked to continental accretion as opposed to southern China where Triassic igneous activity, metamorphism and deformation are linked to the development of an active plate margin through north-directed subduction of the Pacific oceanic plate. A review of the regional palaeogeography, as well as palacontological and thermochronological data, highlights the lack of evidence to support the Indosinian as a major mountain building event. There is no definitive evidence for Triassic collision between the Indochina and South China blocks. Preference is given to a plate tectonic model that explains the Indosinian as a reactivation event driven by accretion of Sibumasu block to Indochina.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-93
Number of pages11
JournalComptes Rendus. Ge´oscience
Volume340
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • Indosinian
  • Vietnam
  • South China
  • palaeogeography
  • orogenesis
  • subduction
  • truong son belt
  • Indo-China
  • Northern Vietnam
  • tectonic evolution
  • Southeastern China
  • Kontum Massif
  • Shear zone
  • ages

Cite this

Was the Indosinian orogeny a Triassic mountain building or a thermotectonic reactivation event? / Carter, Andrew; Clift, Peter D.

In: Comptes Rendus. Ge´oscience, Vol. 340, No. 2-3, 2008, p. 83-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{68eb21350836435cab57a7a44e61d1c2,
title = "Was the Indosinian orogeny a Triassic mountain building or a thermotectonic reactivation event?",
abstract = "The underlying cause of Indosinian thermotectonism remains unclear, in part because the term has also been adopted to explain Triassic orogenesis across southern China. This paper puts forward the case that use of the term Indosinian should be confined to Vietnam where deformation is linked to continental accretion as opposed to southern China where Triassic igneous activity, metamorphism and deformation are linked to the development of an active plate margin through north-directed subduction of the Pacific oceanic plate. A review of the regional palaeogeography, as well as palacontological and thermochronological data, highlights the lack of evidence to support the Indosinian as a major mountain building event. There is no definitive evidence for Triassic collision between the Indochina and South China blocks. Preference is given to a plate tectonic model that explains the Indosinian as a reactivation event driven by accretion of Sibumasu block to Indochina.",
keywords = "Indosinian, Vietnam, South China, palaeogeography, orogenesis, subduction, truong son belt, Indo-China, Northern Vietnam, tectonic evolution, Southeastern China, Kontum Massif, Shear zone, ages",
author = "Andrew Carter and Clift, {Peter D.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1016/j.crte.2007.08.011",
language = "English",
volume = "340",
pages = "83--93",
journal = "Comptes Rendus. Ge´oscience",
issn = "1631-0713",
publisher = "ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Was the Indosinian orogeny a Triassic mountain building or a thermotectonic reactivation event?

AU - Carter, Andrew

AU - Clift, Peter D.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The underlying cause of Indosinian thermotectonism remains unclear, in part because the term has also been adopted to explain Triassic orogenesis across southern China. This paper puts forward the case that use of the term Indosinian should be confined to Vietnam where deformation is linked to continental accretion as opposed to southern China where Triassic igneous activity, metamorphism and deformation are linked to the development of an active plate margin through north-directed subduction of the Pacific oceanic plate. A review of the regional palaeogeography, as well as palacontological and thermochronological data, highlights the lack of evidence to support the Indosinian as a major mountain building event. There is no definitive evidence for Triassic collision between the Indochina and South China blocks. Preference is given to a plate tectonic model that explains the Indosinian as a reactivation event driven by accretion of Sibumasu block to Indochina.

AB - The underlying cause of Indosinian thermotectonism remains unclear, in part because the term has also been adopted to explain Triassic orogenesis across southern China. This paper puts forward the case that use of the term Indosinian should be confined to Vietnam where deformation is linked to continental accretion as opposed to southern China where Triassic igneous activity, metamorphism and deformation are linked to the development of an active plate margin through north-directed subduction of the Pacific oceanic plate. A review of the regional palaeogeography, as well as palacontological and thermochronological data, highlights the lack of evidence to support the Indosinian as a major mountain building event. There is no definitive evidence for Triassic collision between the Indochina and South China blocks. Preference is given to a plate tectonic model that explains the Indosinian as a reactivation event driven by accretion of Sibumasu block to Indochina.

KW - Indosinian

KW - Vietnam

KW - South China

KW - palaeogeography

KW - orogenesis

KW - subduction

KW - truong son belt

KW - Indo-China

KW - Northern Vietnam

KW - tectonic evolution

KW - Southeastern China

KW - Kontum Massif

KW - Shear zone

KW - ages

U2 - 10.1016/j.crte.2007.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.crte.2007.08.011

M3 - Article

VL - 340

SP - 83

EP - 93

JO - Comptes Rendus. Ge´oscience

JF - Comptes Rendus. Ge´oscience

SN - 1631-0713

IS - 2-3

ER -