Ways of mind-walking: reading, writing, painting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What is the difference between walking on the ground, in the landscapes of 'real life', and walking in the imagination, as in reading, writing, painting or listening to music? What does it mean to describe these various practices of walking as either visual or non-visual? In this article, the author approaches these questions through a comparison of answers gleaned from four sources: the monastic practices of early medieval Europe; the painting tradition of the Yolngu, an Aboriginal people of northeast Arnhem Land, Australia; the writings of the great pioneer of modern abstract art, Wassily Kandinsky; and a treatise by the tenth-century Chinese landscape painter Ching Hao. He concludes that the terrains of the imagination and the physical environment, far from existing on distinct ontological levels, run into one another to the extent of being barely distinguishable. Both, however, are inhabited by forms that give outward, sensible shape to an inner generative impulse that is life itself.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-23
Number of pages9
JournalVisual Studies
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2010

Fingerprint

painter
music
art
imagination
Pioneers
Yolngu
Generative
Abstract Art
Aboriginal People
Ontological
Arnhem Land
Landscape Painter
Physical Environment
Treatise
Northeast
Music
Wassily Kandinsky
Early Medieval Europe
Impulse
Real Life

Cite this

Ways of mind-walking : reading, writing, painting . / Ingold, Tim.

In: Visual Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.04.2010, p. 15-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab879351a1c5423c97433be760e0e67f,
title = "Ways of mind-walking: reading, writing, painting",
abstract = "What is the difference between walking on the ground, in the landscapes of 'real life', and walking in the imagination, as in reading, writing, painting or listening to music? What does it mean to describe these various practices of walking as either visual or non-visual? In this article, the author approaches these questions through a comparison of answers gleaned from four sources: the monastic practices of early medieval Europe; the painting tradition of the Yolngu, an Aboriginal people of northeast Arnhem Land, Australia; the writings of the great pioneer of modern abstract art, Wassily Kandinsky; and a treatise by the tenth-century Chinese landscape painter Ching Hao. He concludes that the terrains of the imagination and the physical environment, far from existing on distinct ontological levels, run into one another to the extent of being barely distinguishable. Both, however, are inhabited by forms that give outward, sensible shape to an inner generative impulse that is life itself.",
author = "Tim Ingold",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14725861003606712",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "15--23",
journal = "Visual Studies",
issn = "1472-586X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ways of mind-walking

T2 - reading, writing, painting

AU - Ingold, Tim

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - What is the difference between walking on the ground, in the landscapes of 'real life', and walking in the imagination, as in reading, writing, painting or listening to music? What does it mean to describe these various practices of walking as either visual or non-visual? In this article, the author approaches these questions through a comparison of answers gleaned from four sources: the monastic practices of early medieval Europe; the painting tradition of the Yolngu, an Aboriginal people of northeast Arnhem Land, Australia; the writings of the great pioneer of modern abstract art, Wassily Kandinsky; and a treatise by the tenth-century Chinese landscape painter Ching Hao. He concludes that the terrains of the imagination and the physical environment, far from existing on distinct ontological levels, run into one another to the extent of being barely distinguishable. Both, however, are inhabited by forms that give outward, sensible shape to an inner generative impulse that is life itself.

AB - What is the difference between walking on the ground, in the landscapes of 'real life', and walking in the imagination, as in reading, writing, painting or listening to music? What does it mean to describe these various practices of walking as either visual or non-visual? In this article, the author approaches these questions through a comparison of answers gleaned from four sources: the monastic practices of early medieval Europe; the painting tradition of the Yolngu, an Aboriginal people of northeast Arnhem Land, Australia; the writings of the great pioneer of modern abstract art, Wassily Kandinsky; and a treatise by the tenth-century Chinese landscape painter Ching Hao. He concludes that the terrains of the imagination and the physical environment, far from existing on distinct ontological levels, run into one another to the extent of being barely distinguishable. Both, however, are inhabited by forms that give outward, sensible shape to an inner generative impulse that is life itself.

U2 - 10.1080/14725861003606712

DO - 10.1080/14725861003606712

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 15

EP - 23

JO - Visual Studies

JF - Visual Studies

SN - 1472-586X

IS - 1

ER -