Weight loss interventions in young people (18 to 25 year olds): a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

116 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary This systematic review assesses weight loss interventions in young adults (18-25 years), who are vulnerable to weight gain. This age group experience critical life course points (leaving home for higher studies or job, pregnancy, cohabitation) and develop/establish lifestyle and behavioural patterns making this an opportune intervention period. Medline, Embase, Cinahl, PsychINFO and Cochrane Library were searched (1980 to March 2008). All trials and cohort studies with control groups that assessed weight loss interventions in this specific age group were included finally identifying 14 studies. Before and after comparison of behavioural/motivational interventions (-2.40 kg; 95% CI -5.4 to 0.6) and combination interventions (-2.96; 95% CI -4.4 to -1.5) consistently showed weight loss. Behavioural/motivational interventions increased self-efficacy, the desire to control weight, boosted self-esteem, and increased satisfaction with body areas and appearance. Interventions also showed improvements in HDL cholesterol, insulin, glucose and maximum oxygen uptake. However, recruitment to participation in interventions was a barrier for this age group with small sample sizes and short-term interventions. There may be gender differences in preference to participation in certain type of interventions. Further research to understand attitudes towards healthy lifestyle and preferences of interventions is needed to develop suitable interventions for this vulnerable age group.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)580-592
Number of pages13
JournalObesity Reviews
Volume11
Issue number8
Early online date28 Oct 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

Keywords

  • Systematic review
  • weight loss
  • young people

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Weight loss interventions in young people (18 to 25 year olds): a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this