“What Did She Say? What Did She Say?”

The Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom

Mona Moh'D Amin Almalik (Corresponding Author), Alice Marian Kiger, Janet Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although a few researchers mention that involving interpreters can have an impact on the research process and research findings, little is published regarding methods of assessing the interpretation work’s quality and impact. The impact of lay volunteer interpreters used in audiorecorded semistructured interviews on collecting data and the data quality and subsequent analysis is examined. A new systematic approach is presented comparing original interview transcripts (conducted with volunteer interpreters) with independent transcripts, reinterpretations by professional interpreters. Findings indicate that involving volunteer interpreters had an impact on the validity and reliability of a portion of the data, the subsequent analysis, and some practical research aspects. Researchers involving interpreters should pay careful attention to the interpreters’ influence on the research, the data produced, and critically bring this to bear in their analysis and interpretation. The systematic comparative approach is a cost-effective tool that can be used successfully to examine the influence’s effects.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods
Volume9
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

interpreter
migrant
interpretation
data quality
interview
research process
costs

Keywords

  • interpreter
  • validity
  • reliability
  • quality of data
  • qualitative research

Cite this

“What Did She Say? What Did She Say?” : The Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom. / Almalik, Mona Moh'D Amin (Corresponding Author); Kiger, Alice Marian; Tucker, Janet.

In: International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b45cb46c162e4f15b61e832969786943,
title = "“What Did She Say? What Did She Say?”: The Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom",
abstract = "Although a few researchers mention that involving interpreters can have an impact on the research process and research findings, little is published regarding methods of assessing the interpretation work’s quality and impact. The impact of lay volunteer interpreters used in audiorecorded semistructured interviews on collecting data and the data quality and subsequent analysis is examined. A new systematic approach is presented comparing original interview transcripts (conducted with volunteer interpreters) with independent transcripts, reinterpretations by professional interpreters. Findings indicate that involving volunteer interpreters had an impact on the validity and reliability of a portion of the data, the subsequent analysis, and some practical research aspects. Researchers involving interpreters should pay careful attention to the interpreters’ influence on the research, the data produced, and critically bring this to bear in their analysis and interpretation. The systematic comparative approach is a cost-effective tool that can be used successfully to examine the influence’s effects.",
keywords = "interpreter , validity , reliability , quality of data , qualitative research",
author = "Almalik, {Mona Moh'D Amin} and Kiger, {Alice Marian} and Janet Tucker",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "International Journal of Qualitative Methods",
issn = "1609-4069",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “What Did She Say? What Did She Say?”

T2 - The Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom

AU - Almalik, Mona Moh'D Amin

AU - Kiger, Alice Marian

AU - Tucker, Janet

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Although a few researchers mention that involving interpreters can have an impact on the research process and research findings, little is published regarding methods of assessing the interpretation work’s quality and impact. The impact of lay volunteer interpreters used in audiorecorded semistructured interviews on collecting data and the data quality and subsequent analysis is examined. A new systematic approach is presented comparing original interview transcripts (conducted with volunteer interpreters) with independent transcripts, reinterpretations by professional interpreters. Findings indicate that involving volunteer interpreters had an impact on the validity and reliability of a portion of the data, the subsequent analysis, and some practical research aspects. Researchers involving interpreters should pay careful attention to the interpreters’ influence on the research, the data produced, and critically bring this to bear in their analysis and interpretation. The systematic comparative approach is a cost-effective tool that can be used successfully to examine the influence’s effects.

AB - Although a few researchers mention that involving interpreters can have an impact on the research process and research findings, little is published regarding methods of assessing the interpretation work’s quality and impact. The impact of lay volunteer interpreters used in audiorecorded semistructured interviews on collecting data and the data quality and subsequent analysis is examined. A new systematic approach is presented comparing original interview transcripts (conducted with volunteer interpreters) with independent transcripts, reinterpretations by professional interpreters. Findings indicate that involving volunteer interpreters had an impact on the validity and reliability of a portion of the data, the subsequent analysis, and some practical research aspects. Researchers involving interpreters should pay careful attention to the interpreters’ influence on the research, the data produced, and critically bring this to bear in their analysis and interpretation. The systematic comparative approach is a cost-effective tool that can be used successfully to examine the influence’s effects.

KW - interpreter

KW - validity

KW - reliability

KW - quality of data

KW - qualitative research

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - International Journal of Qualitative Methods

JF - International Journal of Qualitative Methods

SN - 1609-4069

IS - 3

ER -