What drives differences of opinion in sovereign ratings? The roles of information disclosure and political risk

Huong Vu, Rasha Alsakka* (Corresponding Author), Owain ap Gwilym

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the causes of split sovereign ratings across S&P, Moody's, and Fitch for 64 countries from 1997 to 2011. We identify that split sovereign ratings are not symmetric, with S&P tending to be the most conservative agency. We find that opaque sovereigns are more likely to receive split ratings. Political risk plays a highly significant role in explaining split ratings and dominates economic and financial indicators. Out-of-sample model performance is enhanced by capturing political risk. Government information disclosure affects split ratings between Moody's and Fitch in emerging countries. The study implies an incentive for governments to reduce political uncertainty and to enhance transparency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-233
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Finance and Economics
Volume22
Issue number3
Early online date27 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Rating
Information disclosure
Political risk
Sovereign ratings
Government
Financial indicators
Incentives
Economic indicators
Political uncertainty
Emerging countries
Transparency

Keywords

  • information disclosure
  • opacity
  • out-of-sample performance
  • political risk
  • sovereign split ratings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

What drives differences of opinion in sovereign ratings? The roles of information disclosure and political risk. / Vu, Huong; Alsakka, Rasha (Corresponding Author); ap Gwilym, Owain.

In: International Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.07.2017, p. 216-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f3ba896a712415a96ae376272ea1989,
title = "What drives differences of opinion in sovereign ratings? The roles of information disclosure and political risk",
abstract = "This paper investigates the causes of split sovereign ratings across S&P, Moody's, and Fitch for 64 countries from 1997 to 2011. We identify that split sovereign ratings are not symmetric, with S&P tending to be the most conservative agency. We find that opaque sovereigns are more likely to receive split ratings. Political risk plays a highly significant role in explaining split ratings and dominates economic and financial indicators. Out-of-sample model performance is enhanced by capturing political risk. Government information disclosure affects split ratings between Moody's and Fitch in emerging countries. The study implies an incentive for governments to reduce political uncertainty and to enhance transparency.",
keywords = "information disclosure, opacity, out-of-sample performance, political risk, sovereign split ratings",
author = "Huong Vu and Rasha Alsakka and {ap Gwilym}, Owain",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ijfe.1579",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "216--233",
journal = "International Journal of Finance and Economics",
issn = "1076-9307",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What drives differences of opinion in sovereign ratings? The roles of information disclosure and political risk

AU - Vu, Huong

AU - Alsakka, Rasha

AU - ap Gwilym, Owain

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - This paper investigates the causes of split sovereign ratings across S&P, Moody's, and Fitch for 64 countries from 1997 to 2011. We identify that split sovereign ratings are not symmetric, with S&P tending to be the most conservative agency. We find that opaque sovereigns are more likely to receive split ratings. Political risk plays a highly significant role in explaining split ratings and dominates economic and financial indicators. Out-of-sample model performance is enhanced by capturing political risk. Government information disclosure affects split ratings between Moody's and Fitch in emerging countries. The study implies an incentive for governments to reduce political uncertainty and to enhance transparency.

AB - This paper investigates the causes of split sovereign ratings across S&P, Moody's, and Fitch for 64 countries from 1997 to 2011. We identify that split sovereign ratings are not symmetric, with S&P tending to be the most conservative agency. We find that opaque sovereigns are more likely to receive split ratings. Political risk plays a highly significant role in explaining split ratings and dominates economic and financial indicators. Out-of-sample model performance is enhanced by capturing political risk. Government information disclosure affects split ratings between Moody's and Fitch in emerging countries. The study implies an incentive for governments to reduce political uncertainty and to enhance transparency.

KW - information disclosure

KW - opacity

KW - out-of-sample performance

KW - political risk

KW - sovereign split ratings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023752207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ijfe.1579

DO - 10.1002/ijfe.1579

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 216

EP - 233

JO - International Journal of Finance and Economics

JF - International Journal of Finance and Economics

SN - 1076-9307

IS - 3

ER -