What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies?

Sonia Quiroga (Corresponding Author), Cristina Suarez, Andrej Ficko, Diana Feliciano, Laura Bouriaud, Elodie Brahic, Philippe Deuffic, Zuzana Dobsinska, Vilem Jarsky, Anna Lawrence, Erlend Nybakk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study analyses the linkages between private forest owners’ perceptions of forest management, and their affinity for subsidies, in a range of European countries. Society increasingly requires the provision of ecosystem services from forests, but the willingness of forest owners to redirect management goals from wood production to the provision of public goods is crucial for sustaining ecosystem services. EU incentives in the forestry sector are still mainly oriented towards an anthropocentric vision of forest management. Forest owners and managers are diverse, and although many efforts have been made to understand the role of forest subsidies in private forest management, it is still necessary to analyse the different perspectives on forest subsidies with a regional comparative approach. This paper explores European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies – through survey data at European level—and estimates an ordered probit model to (i) analyse how private forest owners in Europe respond to subsidies in forestry, including regional differences in terms of affinity for subsidies, (ii) characterise the factors that influence these responses and (iii) discuss lessons learned related to forest owners' attitudes on subsidies and the implications for introducing similar kind of incentives such as payments for ecosystem services. Simulations were conducted to examine the potential effects of changes in property fragmentation or the time allotted to forest activities. Forest owners with an utilitarian view of forest management, bigger forest holdings, full or part-time farmers and forest owners from East Europe are most in favour of forest subsidies. Property fragmentation and absenteeism decreases affinity for subsidies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)136-144
Number of pages9
JournalForest Policy and Economics
Volume99
Early online date31 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

private forestry
subsidies
subsidy
forest management
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
incentive
forestry incentives
forestry
fragmentation
private forest
Subsidies
Owners
management
timber production
managers
absenteeism

Keywords

  • subsidies
  • European conservation policy
  • forest management
  • conceptualisation
  • private forest owners
  • social-ecological restoration
  • Conceptualisation
  • Social-ecological restoration
  • Private forest owners
  • Forest management
  • Subsidies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies? / Quiroga, Sonia (Corresponding Author); Suarez, Cristina; Ficko, Andrej; Feliciano, Diana; Bouriaud, Laura; Brahic, Elodie; Deuffic, Philippe; Dobsinska, Zuzana; Jarsky, Vilem; Lawrence, Anna; Nybakk, Erlend.

In: Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 99, 01.02.2019, p. 136-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quiroga, S, Suarez, C, Ficko, A, Feliciano, D, Bouriaud, L, Brahic, E, Deuffic, P, Dobsinska, Z, Jarsky, V, Lawrence, A & Nybakk, E 2019, 'What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies?', Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 99, pp. 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.008
Quiroga, Sonia ; Suarez, Cristina ; Ficko, Andrej ; Feliciano, Diana ; Bouriaud, Laura ; Brahic, Elodie ; Deuffic, Philippe ; Dobsinska, Zuzana ; Jarsky, Vilem ; Lawrence, Anna ; Nybakk, Erlend. / What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies?. In: Forest Policy and Economics. 2019 ; Vol. 99. pp. 136-144.
@article{e81674cb4e074f578aa20ca469c0916a,
title = "What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies?",
abstract = "This study analyses the linkages between private forest owners’ perceptions of forest management, and their affinity for subsidies, in a range of European countries. Society increasingly requires the provision of ecosystem services from forests, but the willingness of forest owners to redirect management goals from wood production to the provision of public goods is crucial for sustaining ecosystem services. EU incentives in the forestry sector are still mainly oriented towards an anthropocentric vision of forest management. Forest owners and managers are diverse, and although many efforts have been made to understand the role of forest subsidies in private forest management, it is still necessary to analyse the different perspectives on forest subsidies with a regional comparative approach. This paper explores European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies – through survey data at European level—and estimates an ordered probit model to (i) analyse how private forest owners in Europe respond to subsidies in forestry, including regional differences in terms of affinity for subsidies, (ii) characterise the factors that influence these responses and (iii) discuss lessons learned related to forest owners' attitudes on subsidies and the implications for introducing similar kind of incentives such as payments for ecosystem services. Simulations were conducted to examine the potential effects of changes in property fragmentation or the time allotted to forest activities. Forest owners with an utilitarian view of forest management, bigger forest holdings, full or part-time farmers and forest owners from East Europe are most in favour of forest subsidies. Property fragmentation and absenteeism decreases affinity for subsidies.",
keywords = "subsidies, European conservation policy, forest management, conceptualisation, private forest owners, social-ecological restoration, Conceptualisation, Social-ecological restoration, Private forest owners, Forest management, Subsidies",
author = "Sonia Quiroga and Cristina Suarez and Andrej Ficko and Diana Feliciano and Laura Bouriaud and Elodie Brahic and Philippe Deuffic and Zuzana Dobsinska and Vilem Jarsky and Anna Lawrence and Erlend Nybakk",
note = "We acknowledge the funding from the whole team from FACESMAP FPS COST Action FP1201. Also VJ was supported by the Czech National Agency for Agricultural Research (NAZV) under the contract QJ1530032.",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.008",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "136--144",
journal = "Forest Policy and Economics",
issn = "1389-9341",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies?

AU - Quiroga, Sonia

AU - Suarez, Cristina

AU - Ficko, Andrej

AU - Feliciano, Diana

AU - Bouriaud, Laura

AU - Brahic, Elodie

AU - Deuffic, Philippe

AU - Dobsinska, Zuzana

AU - Jarsky, Vilem

AU - Lawrence, Anna

AU - Nybakk, Erlend

N1 - We acknowledge the funding from the whole team from FACESMAP FPS COST Action FP1201. Also VJ was supported by the Czech National Agency for Agricultural Research (NAZV) under the contract QJ1530032.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - This study analyses the linkages between private forest owners’ perceptions of forest management, and their affinity for subsidies, in a range of European countries. Society increasingly requires the provision of ecosystem services from forests, but the willingness of forest owners to redirect management goals from wood production to the provision of public goods is crucial for sustaining ecosystem services. EU incentives in the forestry sector are still mainly oriented towards an anthropocentric vision of forest management. Forest owners and managers are diverse, and although many efforts have been made to understand the role of forest subsidies in private forest management, it is still necessary to analyse the different perspectives on forest subsidies with a regional comparative approach. This paper explores European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies – through survey data at European level—and estimates an ordered probit model to (i) analyse how private forest owners in Europe respond to subsidies in forestry, including regional differences in terms of affinity for subsidies, (ii) characterise the factors that influence these responses and (iii) discuss lessons learned related to forest owners' attitudes on subsidies and the implications for introducing similar kind of incentives such as payments for ecosystem services. Simulations were conducted to examine the potential effects of changes in property fragmentation or the time allotted to forest activities. Forest owners with an utilitarian view of forest management, bigger forest holdings, full or part-time farmers and forest owners from East Europe are most in favour of forest subsidies. Property fragmentation and absenteeism decreases affinity for subsidies.

AB - This study analyses the linkages between private forest owners’ perceptions of forest management, and their affinity for subsidies, in a range of European countries. Society increasingly requires the provision of ecosystem services from forests, but the willingness of forest owners to redirect management goals from wood production to the provision of public goods is crucial for sustaining ecosystem services. EU incentives in the forestry sector are still mainly oriented towards an anthropocentric vision of forest management. Forest owners and managers are diverse, and although many efforts have been made to understand the role of forest subsidies in private forest management, it is still necessary to analyse the different perspectives on forest subsidies with a regional comparative approach. This paper explores European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies – through survey data at European level—and estimates an ordered probit model to (i) analyse how private forest owners in Europe respond to subsidies in forestry, including regional differences in terms of affinity for subsidies, (ii) characterise the factors that influence these responses and (iii) discuss lessons learned related to forest owners' attitudes on subsidies and the implications for introducing similar kind of incentives such as payments for ecosystem services. Simulations were conducted to examine the potential effects of changes in property fragmentation or the time allotted to forest activities. Forest owners with an utilitarian view of forest management, bigger forest holdings, full or part-time farmers and forest owners from East Europe are most in favour of forest subsidies. Property fragmentation and absenteeism decreases affinity for subsidies.

KW - subsidies

KW - European conservation policy

KW - forest management

KW - conceptualisation

KW - private forest owners

KW - social-ecological restoration

KW - Conceptualisation

KW - Social-ecological restoration

KW - Private forest owners

KW - Forest management

KW - Subsidies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052736834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.008

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 136

EP - 144

JO - Forest Policy and Economics

JF - Forest Policy and Economics

SN - 1389-9341

ER -