What is sustainability?

Tom Kuhlman, John Farrington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

161 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sustainability as a policy concept has its origin in the Brundtland Report of 1987. That document was concerned with the tension between the aspirations of mankind towards a better life on the one hand and the limitations imposed by nature on the other hand. In the course of time, the concept has been re-interpreted as encompassing three dimensions, namely social, economic and environmental. The paper argues that this change in meaning (a) obscures the real contradiction between the aims of welfare for all and environmental conservation; (b) risks diminishing the importance of the environmental dimension; and (c) separates social from economic aspects, which in reality are one and the same. It is proposed instead to return to the original meaning, where sustainability is concerned with the well-being of future generations and in particular with irreplaceable natural resources—as opposed to the gratification of present needs which we call well-being. A balance needs to be found between those two, but not by pretending they are three sides of the same coin. Although we use up natural resources at the expense of future generations, we also generate capital (including knowledge) which raises future well-being. A major question is to what extent the one compensates for the other. This debate centres around the problem of substitutability, which has been cast into a distinction between ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ sustainability. It is argued that these two do not need to be in opposition but complement one another.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3436-3448
Number of pages13
JournalSustainability
Volume2
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
well-being
sustainability
Economics
Natural resources
economics
social economics
natural resources
Conservation
opposition
natural resource
conservation
welfare
present
time
need
policy
environmental conservation
document

Keywords

  • sustainability
  • well-being
  • welfare

Cite this

What is sustainability? / Kuhlman, Tom; Farrington, John.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 11, 11.2010, p. 3436-3448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuhlman, Tom ; Farrington, John. / What is sustainability?. In: Sustainability. 2010 ; Vol. 2, No. 11. pp. 3436-3448.
@article{bea109bc51c84daa8d3258d6698c220a,
title = "What is sustainability?",
abstract = "Sustainability as a policy concept has its origin in the Brundtland Report of 1987. That document was concerned with the tension between the aspirations of mankind towards a better life on the one hand and the limitations imposed by nature on the other hand. In the course of time, the concept has been re-interpreted as encompassing three dimensions, namely social, economic and environmental. The paper argues that this change in meaning (a) obscures the real contradiction between the aims of welfare for all and environmental conservation; (b) risks diminishing the importance of the environmental dimension; and (c) separates social from economic aspects, which in reality are one and the same. It is proposed instead to return to the original meaning, where sustainability is concerned with the well-being of future generations and in particular with irreplaceable natural resources—as opposed to the gratification of present needs which we call well-being. A balance needs to be found between those two, but not by pretending they are three sides of the same coin. Although we use up natural resources at the expense of future generations, we also generate capital (including knowledge) which raises future well-being. A major question is to what extent the one compensates for the other. This debate centres around the problem of substitutability, which has been cast into a distinction between ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ sustainability. It is argued that these two do not need to be in opposition but complement one another.",
keywords = "sustainability, well-being, welfare",
author = "Tom Kuhlman and John Farrington",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3390/su2113436",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "3436--3448",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is sustainability?

AU - Kuhlman, Tom

AU - Farrington, John

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Sustainability as a policy concept has its origin in the Brundtland Report of 1987. That document was concerned with the tension between the aspirations of mankind towards a better life on the one hand and the limitations imposed by nature on the other hand. In the course of time, the concept has been re-interpreted as encompassing three dimensions, namely social, economic and environmental. The paper argues that this change in meaning (a) obscures the real contradiction between the aims of welfare for all and environmental conservation; (b) risks diminishing the importance of the environmental dimension; and (c) separates social from economic aspects, which in reality are one and the same. It is proposed instead to return to the original meaning, where sustainability is concerned with the well-being of future generations and in particular with irreplaceable natural resources—as opposed to the gratification of present needs which we call well-being. A balance needs to be found between those two, but not by pretending they are three sides of the same coin. Although we use up natural resources at the expense of future generations, we also generate capital (including knowledge) which raises future well-being. A major question is to what extent the one compensates for the other. This debate centres around the problem of substitutability, which has been cast into a distinction between ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ sustainability. It is argued that these two do not need to be in opposition but complement one another.

AB - Sustainability as a policy concept has its origin in the Brundtland Report of 1987. That document was concerned with the tension between the aspirations of mankind towards a better life on the one hand and the limitations imposed by nature on the other hand. In the course of time, the concept has been re-interpreted as encompassing three dimensions, namely social, economic and environmental. The paper argues that this change in meaning (a) obscures the real contradiction between the aims of welfare for all and environmental conservation; (b) risks diminishing the importance of the environmental dimension; and (c) separates social from economic aspects, which in reality are one and the same. It is proposed instead to return to the original meaning, where sustainability is concerned with the well-being of future generations and in particular with irreplaceable natural resources—as opposed to the gratification of present needs which we call well-being. A balance needs to be found between those two, but not by pretending they are three sides of the same coin. Although we use up natural resources at the expense of future generations, we also generate capital (including knowledge) which raises future well-being. A major question is to what extent the one compensates for the other. This debate centres around the problem of substitutability, which has been cast into a distinction between ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ sustainability. It is argued that these two do not need to be in opposition but complement one another.

KW - sustainability

KW - well-being

KW - welfare

U2 - 10.3390/su2113436

DO - 10.3390/su2113436

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 3436

EP - 3448

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 11

ER -