What is the most ecologically-meaningful metric of nitrogen deposition?

Richard Payne (Corresponding Author), C Campbell, Andrea J. Britton, Ruth Mitchell, Robin J. Pakeman, Laurence Jones, Louise C Ross, Carly J. Stevens, C Field, Simon Caporn, J Carroll, J Edmondson, E Carnell, S Tomlinson, A Dore, Nancy B. Dise, Ulrike Dragisits

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) deposition poses a severe risk to global terrestrial ecosystems, and managing this threat is an important focus for air pollution science and policy. To understand and manage the impacts of N deposition, we need metrics which accurately reflect N deposition pressure on the environment, and are responsive to changes in both N deposition and its impacts over time. In the UK, the metric typically used is a measure of total N deposition over 1–3 years, despite evidence that N accumulates in many ecosystems and impacts from low-level exposure can take considerable time to develop. Improvements in N deposition modelling now allow the development of metrics which incorporate the long-term history of pollution, as well as current exposure. Here we test the potential of alternative N deposition metrics to explain vegetation compositional variability in British semi-natural habitats. We assembled 36 individual datasets representing 48,332 occurrence records in 5479 quadrats from 1683 sites, and used redundancy analyses to test the explanatory power of 33 alternative N metrics based on national pollutant deposition models. We find convincing evidence for N deposition impacts across datasets and habitats, even when accounting for other large-scale drivers of vegetation change. Metrics that incorporate long-term N deposition trajectories consistently explain greater compositional variance than 1–3 year N deposition. There is considerable variability in results across habitats and between similar metrics, but overall we propose that a thirty-year moving window of cumulative deposition is optimal to represent impacts on plant communities for application in science, policy and management.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-331
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume247
Early online date18 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Ecosystem
Nitrogen
Air Pollution
Ecosystems
Pressure
Air pollution
Redundancy
Pollution
Trajectories
Datasets

Keywords

  • air pollution
  • biodiversity
  • cumulative deposition
  • vegetation
  • community ecology
  • environmental change
  • nitrogen deposition
  • Community ecology
  • Environmental change
  • Cumulative deposition
  • Biodiversity
  • Vegetation
  • Air pollution
  • Nitrogen deposition
  • PLANT
  • CLIMATE-CHANGE
  • OXIDIZED NITROGEN
  • SPECIES RICHNESS
  • DRY DEPOSITION
  • DIVERSITY
  • SAND DUNES
  • IMPACTS
  • ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN
  • VEGETATION

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Payne, R., Campbell, C., Britton, A. J., Mitchell, R., Pakeman, R. J., Jones, L., ... Dragisits, U. (2019). What is the most ecologically-meaningful metric of nitrogen deposition? Environmental Pollution, 247, 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.059

What is the most ecologically-meaningful metric of nitrogen deposition? / Payne, Richard (Corresponding Author); Campbell, C; Britton, Andrea J.; Mitchell, Ruth; Pakeman, Robin J.; Jones, Laurence ; Ross, Louise C; Stevens, Carly J.; Field, C; Caporn, Simon ; Carroll, J; Edmondson, J; Carnell, E; Tomlinson, S; Dore, A; Dise, Nancy B.; Dragisits, Ulrike.

In: Environmental Pollution, Vol. 247, 04.2019, p. 319-331.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Payne, R, Campbell, C, Britton, AJ, Mitchell, R, Pakeman, RJ, Jones, L, Ross, LC, Stevens, CJ, Field, C, Caporn, S, Carroll, J, Edmondson, J, Carnell, E, Tomlinson, S, Dore, A, Dise, NB & Dragisits, U 2019, 'What is the most ecologically-meaningful metric of nitrogen deposition?', Environmental Pollution, vol. 247, pp. 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.059
Payne R, Campbell C, Britton AJ, Mitchell R, Pakeman RJ, Jones L et al. What is the most ecologically-meaningful metric of nitrogen deposition? Environmental Pollution. 2019 Apr;247:319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.059
Payne, Richard ; Campbell, C ; Britton, Andrea J. ; Mitchell, Ruth ; Pakeman, Robin J. ; Jones, Laurence ; Ross, Louise C ; Stevens, Carly J. ; Field, C ; Caporn, Simon ; Carroll, J ; Edmondson, J ; Carnell, E ; Tomlinson, S ; Dore, A ; Dise, Nancy B. ; Dragisits, Ulrike. / What is the most ecologically-meaningful metric of nitrogen deposition?. In: Environmental Pollution. 2019 ; Vol. 247. pp. 319-331.
@article{077e2aaf61554605acdf71f4ef24b9a9,
title = "What is the most ecologically-meaningful metric of nitrogen deposition?",
abstract = "Nitrogen (N) deposition poses a severe risk to global terrestrial ecosystems, and managing this threat is an important focus for air pollution science and policy. To understand and manage the impacts of N deposition, we need metrics which accurately reflect N deposition pressure on the environment, and are responsive to changes in both N deposition and its impacts over time. In the UK, the metric typically used is a measure of total N deposition over 1–3 years, despite evidence that N accumulates in many ecosystems and impacts from low-level exposure can take considerable time to develop. Improvements in N deposition modelling now allow the development of metrics which incorporate the long-term history of pollution, as well as current exposure. Here we test the potential of alternative N deposition metrics to explain vegetation compositional variability in British semi-natural habitats. We assembled 36 individual datasets representing 48,332 occurrence records in 5479 quadrats from 1683 sites, and used redundancy analyses to test the explanatory power of 33 alternative N metrics based on national pollutant deposition models. We find convincing evidence for N deposition impacts across datasets and habitats, even when accounting for other large-scale drivers of vegetation change. Metrics that incorporate long-term N deposition trajectories consistently explain greater compositional variance than 1–3 year N deposition. There is considerable variability in results across habitats and between similar metrics, but overall we propose that a thirty-year moving window of cumulative deposition is optimal to represent impacts on plant communities for application in science, policy and management.",
keywords = "air pollution, biodiversity, cumulative deposition, vegetation, community ecology, environmental change, nitrogen deposition, Community ecology, Environmental change, Cumulative deposition, Biodiversity, Vegetation, Air pollution, Nitrogen deposition, PLANT, CLIMATE-CHANGE, OXIDIZED NITROGEN, SPECIES RICHNESS, DRY DEPOSITION, DIVERSITY, SAND DUNES, IMPACTS, ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN, VEGETATION",
author = "Richard Payne and C Campbell and Britton, {Andrea J.} and Ruth Mitchell and Pakeman, {Robin J.} and Laurence Jones and Ross, {Louise C} and Stevens, {Carly J.} and C Field and Simon Caporn and J Carroll and J Edmondson and E Carnell and S Tomlinson and A Dore and Dise, {Nancy B.} and Ulrike Dragisits",
note = "This study was primarily funded by the Natural Environment Research Council, part of UK Research and Innovation, through grant NE/R00546X/1 to RiJP. N deposition modelling was funded by the NERC Macronutrient Cycles Programme (LTLS project: NE/J011533/1). AB, RJM and RoJP were supported by the 2011–2016 and 2016–2021 Strategic Research Programmes of the Scottish Government. We acknowledge support and advice from Dr Willie Duncan (SEPA).",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.059",
language = "English",
volume = "247",
pages = "319--331",
journal = "Environmental Pollution",
issn = "0269-7491",
publisher = "ELSEVIER APPL SCI PUBL LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the most ecologically-meaningful metric of nitrogen deposition?

AU - Payne, Richard

AU - Campbell, C

AU - Britton, Andrea J.

AU - Mitchell, Ruth

AU - Pakeman, Robin J.

AU - Jones, Laurence

AU - Ross, Louise C

AU - Stevens, Carly J.

AU - Field, C

AU - Caporn, Simon

AU - Carroll, J

AU - Edmondson, J

AU - Carnell, E

AU - Tomlinson, S

AU - Dore, A

AU - Dise, Nancy B.

AU - Dragisits, Ulrike

N1 - This study was primarily funded by the Natural Environment Research Council, part of UK Research and Innovation, through grant NE/R00546X/1 to RiJP. N deposition modelling was funded by the NERC Macronutrient Cycles Programme (LTLS project: NE/J011533/1). AB, RJM and RoJP were supported by the 2011–2016 and 2016–2021 Strategic Research Programmes of the Scottish Government. We acknowledge support and advice from Dr Willie Duncan (SEPA).

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Nitrogen (N) deposition poses a severe risk to global terrestrial ecosystems, and managing this threat is an important focus for air pollution science and policy. To understand and manage the impacts of N deposition, we need metrics which accurately reflect N deposition pressure on the environment, and are responsive to changes in both N deposition and its impacts over time. In the UK, the metric typically used is a measure of total N deposition over 1–3 years, despite evidence that N accumulates in many ecosystems and impacts from low-level exposure can take considerable time to develop. Improvements in N deposition modelling now allow the development of metrics which incorporate the long-term history of pollution, as well as current exposure. Here we test the potential of alternative N deposition metrics to explain vegetation compositional variability in British semi-natural habitats. We assembled 36 individual datasets representing 48,332 occurrence records in 5479 quadrats from 1683 sites, and used redundancy analyses to test the explanatory power of 33 alternative N metrics based on national pollutant deposition models. We find convincing evidence for N deposition impacts across datasets and habitats, even when accounting for other large-scale drivers of vegetation change. Metrics that incorporate long-term N deposition trajectories consistently explain greater compositional variance than 1–3 year N deposition. There is considerable variability in results across habitats and between similar metrics, but overall we propose that a thirty-year moving window of cumulative deposition is optimal to represent impacts on plant communities for application in science, policy and management.

AB - Nitrogen (N) deposition poses a severe risk to global terrestrial ecosystems, and managing this threat is an important focus for air pollution science and policy. To understand and manage the impacts of N deposition, we need metrics which accurately reflect N deposition pressure on the environment, and are responsive to changes in both N deposition and its impacts over time. In the UK, the metric typically used is a measure of total N deposition over 1–3 years, despite evidence that N accumulates in many ecosystems and impacts from low-level exposure can take considerable time to develop. Improvements in N deposition modelling now allow the development of metrics which incorporate the long-term history of pollution, as well as current exposure. Here we test the potential of alternative N deposition metrics to explain vegetation compositional variability in British semi-natural habitats. We assembled 36 individual datasets representing 48,332 occurrence records in 5479 quadrats from 1683 sites, and used redundancy analyses to test the explanatory power of 33 alternative N metrics based on national pollutant deposition models. We find convincing evidence for N deposition impacts across datasets and habitats, even when accounting for other large-scale drivers of vegetation change. Metrics that incorporate long-term N deposition trajectories consistently explain greater compositional variance than 1–3 year N deposition. There is considerable variability in results across habitats and between similar metrics, but overall we propose that a thirty-year moving window of cumulative deposition is optimal to represent impacts on plant communities for application in science, policy and management.

KW - air pollution

KW - biodiversity

KW - cumulative deposition

KW - vegetation

KW - community ecology

KW - environmental change

KW - nitrogen deposition

KW - Community ecology

KW - Environmental change

KW - Cumulative deposition

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Vegetation

KW - Air pollution

KW - Nitrogen deposition

KW - PLANT

KW - CLIMATE-CHANGE

KW - OXIDIZED NITROGEN

KW - SPECIES RICHNESS

KW - DRY DEPOSITION

KW - DIVERSITY

KW - SAND DUNES

KW - IMPACTS

KW - ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN

KW - VEGETATION

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060937554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/most-ecologicallymeaningful-metric-nitrogen-deposition-1

U2 - 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.059

DO - 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.059

M3 - Article

VL - 247

SP - 319

EP - 331

JO - Environmental Pollution

JF - Environmental Pollution

SN - 0269-7491

ER -

Access to Document

  • Accepted Manuscript

    © 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    Accepted author manuscript, 932 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND