What Makes the EU Viable?

European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience

Andrew Glencross

Research output: Book/ReportBook

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This book is distinguished by its use of the antebellum US experience as a foil to address the under-explored question of what makes the EU viable. The nature of political conflict in both cases is defined in terms of four contested rules of the game: state sovereignty, federal competences, political representation and decision-making procedures. Hence, viabilty is conceptualized as the ability to find an agreement over these four elements.

The analysis shows that, to remain viable, the antebellum USA resorted to an ultimately untenable voluntary centralization of these rules of the game. Conversely, the EU has maintained a dynamic equilibrium, although this is not a self-reinforcing process. The transatlantic contrast is then used to examine proposals for reforming the EU, especially its system of political representation. The comparison reveals that, despite high expectations, changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationBasingstoke, United Kingdom
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Number of pages248
ISBN (Print)0230224504, 978-0230224506
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jul 2009

Fingerprint

European integration
EU
experience
political conflict
centralization
sovereignty
decision making
ability

Cite this

Glencross, A. (2009). What Makes the EU Viable? European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan .

What Makes the EU Viable? European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience. / Glencross, Andrew.

Basingstoke, United Kingdom : Palgrave Macmillan , 2009. 248 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Glencross, A 2009, What Makes the EU Viable? European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience. Palgrave Macmillan , Basingstoke, United Kingdom.
Glencross A. What Makes the EU Viable? European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan , 2009. 248 p.
Glencross, Andrew. / What Makes the EU Viable? European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience. Basingstoke, United Kingdom : Palgrave Macmillan , 2009. 248 p.
@book{87244cfb5e0f42a88fdeda4bb0634e17,
title = "What Makes the EU Viable?: European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience",
abstract = "This book is distinguished by its use of the antebellum US experience as a foil to address the under-explored question of what makes the EU viable. The nature of political conflict in both cases is defined in terms of four contested rules of the game: state sovereignty, federal competences, political representation and decision-making procedures. Hence, viabilty is conceptualized as the ability to find an agreement over these four elements. The analysis shows that, to remain viable, the antebellum USA resorted to an ultimately untenable voluntary centralization of these rules of the game. Conversely, the EU has maintained a dynamic equilibrium, although this is not a self-reinforcing process. The transatlantic contrast is then used to examine proposals for reforming the EU, especially its system of political representation. The comparison reveals that, despite high expectations, changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.",
author = "Andrew Glencross",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "8",
language = "English",
isbn = "0230224504",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - What Makes the EU Viable?

T2 - European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum US Experience

AU - Glencross, Andrew

PY - 2009/7/8

Y1 - 2009/7/8

N2 - This book is distinguished by its use of the antebellum US experience as a foil to address the under-explored question of what makes the EU viable. The nature of political conflict in both cases is defined in terms of four contested rules of the game: state sovereignty, federal competences, political representation and decision-making procedures. Hence, viabilty is conceptualized as the ability to find an agreement over these four elements. The analysis shows that, to remain viable, the antebellum USA resorted to an ultimately untenable voluntary centralization of these rules of the game. Conversely, the EU has maintained a dynamic equilibrium, although this is not a self-reinforcing process. The transatlantic contrast is then used to examine proposals for reforming the EU, especially its system of political representation. The comparison reveals that, despite high expectations, changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.

AB - This book is distinguished by its use of the antebellum US experience as a foil to address the under-explored question of what makes the EU viable. The nature of political conflict in both cases is defined in terms of four contested rules of the game: state sovereignty, federal competences, political representation and decision-making procedures. Hence, viabilty is conceptualized as the ability to find an agreement over these four elements. The analysis shows that, to remain viable, the antebellum USA resorted to an ultimately untenable voluntary centralization of these rules of the game. Conversely, the EU has maintained a dynamic equilibrium, although this is not a self-reinforcing process. The transatlantic contrast is then used to examine proposals for reforming the EU, especially its system of political representation. The comparison reveals that, despite high expectations, changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.

M3 - Book

SN - 0230224504

SN - 978-0230224506

BT - What Makes the EU Viable?

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Basingstoke, United Kingdom

ER -