What the eye doesn't see

The prevalence of fraud in ornithology

Andrew H.J. Harrop*, J. Martin Collinson, Tim Melling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a tendency to see examples of fraud in ornithology as rare aberrations. This paper outlines some known and suspected historical examples of fraud, and argues that fraud of one kind or another has occurred more or less consistently, if uncommonly, in ornithology. Although most of the examples discussed are from Britain, it is likely that similar examples could be found in the archives of many nations. It is also likely that small-scale fraud continues today and is something that the ornithological community should be aware of. In particular, this has implications for the level of proof required by those assessing records of rarities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-257
Number of pages22
JournalBritish Birds
Volume105
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2012

Fingerprint

fraud
ornithology
eyes
United Kingdom

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

What the eye doesn't see : The prevalence of fraud in ornithology. / Harrop, Andrew H.J.; Collinson, J. Martin; Melling, Tim.

In: British Birds, Vol. 105, No. 5, 01.05.2012, p. 236-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Harrop, AHJ, Collinson, JM & Melling, T 2012, 'What the eye doesn't see: The prevalence of fraud in ornithology', British Birds, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 236-257.
Harrop, Andrew H.J. ; Collinson, J. Martin ; Melling, Tim. / What the eye doesn't see : The prevalence of fraud in ornithology. In: British Birds. 2012 ; Vol. 105, No. 5. pp. 236-257.
@article{0849c4bc9ceb49c8b17644f91a7a4347,
title = "What the eye doesn't see: The prevalence of fraud in ornithology",
abstract = "There is a tendency to see examples of fraud in ornithology as rare aberrations. This paper outlines some known and suspected historical examples of fraud, and argues that fraud of one kind or another has occurred more or less consistently, if uncommonly, in ornithology. Although most of the examples discussed are from Britain, it is likely that similar examples could be found in the archives of many nations. It is also likely that small-scale fraud continues today and is something that the ornithological community should be aware of. In particular, this has implications for the level of proof required by those assessing records of rarities.",
author = "Harrop, {Andrew H.J.} and Collinson, {J. Martin} and Tim Melling",
note = "Members of BOURC have commented on numerous review files over the years; to some extent this paper derives from work done during those reviews. Current BOURC members and Keith Naylor, BOURC’s consultant on historical records, kindly commented on a draft of this paper. Graham Catley and Ken Shaw offered insights into contemporary fraud. We especially thank Alan Knox for his extensive comments. Sophie Wilcox at the Alexander Library, Oxford, provided help with references",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "236--257",
journal = "British Birds",
issn = "0007-0335",
publisher = "British Birds Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What the eye doesn't see

T2 - The prevalence of fraud in ornithology

AU - Harrop, Andrew H.J.

AU - Collinson, J. Martin

AU - Melling, Tim

N1 - Members of BOURC have commented on numerous review files over the years; to some extent this paper derives from work done during those reviews. Current BOURC members and Keith Naylor, BOURC’s consultant on historical records, kindly commented on a draft of this paper. Graham Catley and Ken Shaw offered insights into contemporary fraud. We especially thank Alan Knox for his extensive comments. Sophie Wilcox at the Alexander Library, Oxford, provided help with references

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - There is a tendency to see examples of fraud in ornithology as rare aberrations. This paper outlines some known and suspected historical examples of fraud, and argues that fraud of one kind or another has occurred more or less consistently, if uncommonly, in ornithology. Although most of the examples discussed are from Britain, it is likely that similar examples could be found in the archives of many nations. It is also likely that small-scale fraud continues today and is something that the ornithological community should be aware of. In particular, this has implications for the level of proof required by those assessing records of rarities.

AB - There is a tendency to see examples of fraud in ornithology as rare aberrations. This paper outlines some known and suspected historical examples of fraud, and argues that fraud of one kind or another has occurred more or less consistently, if uncommonly, in ornithology. Although most of the examples discussed are from Britain, it is likely that similar examples could be found in the archives of many nations. It is also likely that small-scale fraud continues today and is something that the ornithological community should be aware of. In particular, this has implications for the level of proof required by those assessing records of rarities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869141411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 105

SP - 236

EP - 257

JO - British Birds

JF - British Birds

SN - 0007-0335

IS - 5

ER -