Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
The University of Aberdeen Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Disciplines
Research output
Research Facilities
Datasets
Impacts
Activities
Press/Media
Prizes
Projects
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
When safety is relative: Ecological Modernisation theory and the nuclear safety regulatory regimes of France, the United Kingdom and United States
David Toke
*
(Corresponding Author)
*
Corresponding author for this work
Centre for Energy Transition
Politics
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
4
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When safety is relative: Ecological Modernisation theory and the nuclear safety regulatory regimes of France, the United Kingdom and United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Social Sciences
modernization theory
100%
Safety regulations
93%
regulatory regime
87%
modernization
63%
France
57%
Precautionary principle
48%
Environmental regulations
43%
economic efficiency
23%
cost-benefit analysis
21%
industry
21%
costs
20%
nuclear power
19%
non-governmental organization
16%
uncertainty
13%
EU
13%
acceptance
13%
leadership
11%
regulation
10%
discourse
9%
Engineering & Materials Science
Modernization
82%
Environmental regulations
47%
Nuclear industry
23%
Cost benefit analysis
23%
Nuclear energy
18%
Costs
14%
Economics
11%
Uncertainty
11%
Industry
8%