When warrant transmits and when it doesn't

towards a general framework

Luca Moretti, Tommaso Piazza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we focus on transmission and failure of transmission of
warrant.We identify three individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for transmission of warrant, and we show that their satisfaction grounds a number of interesting epistemic phenomena that have not been sufficiently appreciated in the literature. We then scrutinise Wright’s analysis of transmission failure and improve on extant readings of it. Nonetheless, we present a Bayesian counter example that shows that Wright’s analysis is partially incoherent with our analysis of warrant transmission and prima facie defective. We conclude exploring three alternative lines of reply: developing a more satisfactory account of transmission failure, which we outline; dismissing the Bayesian counterexample by rejecting some of its assumptions; reinterpreting Wright’s analysis to make it immune to the counter example.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2481-2503
Number of pages22
JournalSynthese
Volume190
Issue number13
Early online date6 Oct 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Warrants
Counterexample
literature
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions

Keywords

  • transmission of warrant
  • transmission failure
  • epistemic transmission
  • propositional warrant
  • Crispin Wright

Cite this

When warrant transmits and when it doesn't : towards a general framework. / Moretti, Luca; Piazza, Tommaso.

In: Synthese, Vol. 190, No. 13, 09.2013, p. 2481-2503.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moretti, Luca ; Piazza, Tommaso. / When warrant transmits and when it doesn't : towards a general framework. In: Synthese. 2013 ; Vol. 190, No. 13. pp. 2481-2503.
@article{b17ad32843bc48b7ab0d80be663c8e4e,
title = "When warrant transmits and when it doesn't: towards a general framework",
abstract = "In this paper we focus on transmission and failure of transmission of warrant.We identify three individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for transmission of warrant, and we show that their satisfaction grounds a number of interesting epistemic phenomena that have not been sufficiently appreciated in the literature. We then scrutinise Wright’s analysis of transmission failure and improve on extant readings of it. Nonetheless, we present a Bayesian counter example that shows that Wright’s analysis is partially incoherent with our analysis of warrant transmission and prima facie defective. We conclude exploring three alternative lines of reply: developing a more satisfactory account of transmission failure, which we outline; dismissing the Bayesian counterexample by rejecting some of its assumptions; reinterpreting Wright’s analysis to make it immune to the counter example.",
keywords = "transmission of warrant, transmission failure, epistemic transmission, propositional warrant, Crispin Wright",
author = "Luca Moretti and Tommaso Piazza",
note = "Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Greg Wheeler and two referees of this Journal for valuable feedback.",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-011-0018-2",
language = "English",
volume = "190",
pages = "2481--2503",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When warrant transmits and when it doesn't

T2 - towards a general framework

AU - Moretti, Luca

AU - Piazza, Tommaso

N1 - Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Greg Wheeler and two referees of this Journal for valuable feedback.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - In this paper we focus on transmission and failure of transmission of warrant.We identify three individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for transmission of warrant, and we show that their satisfaction grounds a number of interesting epistemic phenomena that have not been sufficiently appreciated in the literature. We then scrutinise Wright’s analysis of transmission failure and improve on extant readings of it. Nonetheless, we present a Bayesian counter example that shows that Wright’s analysis is partially incoherent with our analysis of warrant transmission and prima facie defective. We conclude exploring three alternative lines of reply: developing a more satisfactory account of transmission failure, which we outline; dismissing the Bayesian counterexample by rejecting some of its assumptions; reinterpreting Wright’s analysis to make it immune to the counter example.

AB - In this paper we focus on transmission and failure of transmission of warrant.We identify three individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for transmission of warrant, and we show that their satisfaction grounds a number of interesting epistemic phenomena that have not been sufficiently appreciated in the literature. We then scrutinise Wright’s analysis of transmission failure and improve on extant readings of it. Nonetheless, we present a Bayesian counter example that shows that Wright’s analysis is partially incoherent with our analysis of warrant transmission and prima facie defective. We conclude exploring three alternative lines of reply: developing a more satisfactory account of transmission failure, which we outline; dismissing the Bayesian counterexample by rejecting some of its assumptions; reinterpreting Wright’s analysis to make it immune to the counter example.

KW - transmission of warrant

KW - transmission failure

KW - epistemic transmission

KW - propositional warrant

KW - Crispin Wright

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-011-0018-2

DO - 10.1007/s11229-011-0018-2

M3 - Article

VL - 190

SP - 2481

EP - 2503

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

IS - 13

ER -