Which agroforestry options give the greatest soil and above ground carbon benefits in different world regions?

Diana Feliciano (Corresponding Author), Alicia Ledo, Jonathan George Hillier, Dali Rani Nayak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Climate change mitigation and food security are two of the main challenges of human society. Agroforestry systems, defined as the presence of trees on external and internal boundaries, cropland, or on any other available niche of farmland, can provide both climate change mitigation and food. There are several types of agroforestry systems with different rates of above ground and soil carbon (C) sequestration. The amount of carbon sequestered can depend on the type of system, climate, time since land use change and previous land use. Data was collected from a total of 86 published and peer reviewed studies on soil and above ground carbon sequestration for different agroforestry systems, climates and regions in the world. The objective was to understand which agroforestry systems provide the greatest benefits, and what are the main factors influencing, soil and above ground carbon sequestration. The results show that, on average, more soil carbon sequestration occurs in agroforestry systems classified as silvopastoral (4.38 tC ha−1 yr−1), and more above ground carbon sequestration occurs in improved fallows (11.29 tC ha−1 yr−1). On average, carbon benefits are greater in agroforestry systems Tropical climates when compared to agroforestry systems located in other climates, both in terms of soil (2.23 tC ha−1 yr−1) and above ground (4.85 tC ha−1 yr−1). In terms of land use change, the greatest above ground carbon sequestration (12.8 tC ha−1 yr−1) occurs when degraded land is replaced by improved fallow and the greatest soil carbon sequestration (4.38 tC ha−1 yr−1) results from the transition of a grassland system to a silvopastoral system. Time since the change is implemented was the main factor influencing above ground carbon sequestration, while climate mainly influences soil carbon sequestration most. The results of the analysis may be used to inform practitioners and policy makers on the most effective agroforestry system for carbon sequestration. The lack of data on carbon stocks before the implementation land use change and the lack of reporting on soil sampling design and variances were the main limitations in the data. The need to report this data should be considered in future studies if agroforestry systems are expected to play an important role as a climate change mitigation strategy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-129
Number of pages13
JournalAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Volume254
Early online date5 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

agroforestry
carbon sequestration
carbon
soil
soil carbon
land use change
climate
climate change
fallow
world
silvopastoral systems
peers
food security
carbon sinks
agricultural land
tropics
niches
soil sampling
niche
land use

Keywords

  • climate change
  • meta-analysis
  • mitigation
  • trees
  • agriculture

Cite this

Which agroforestry options give the greatest soil and above ground carbon benefits in different world regions? / Feliciano, Diana (Corresponding Author); Ledo, Alicia; Hillier, Jonathan George; Nayak, Dali Rani.

In: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 254, 15.02.2018, p. 117-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe217390cf644fde9d5383f81555383e,
title = "Which agroforestry options give the greatest soil and above ground carbon benefits in different world regions?",
abstract = "Climate change mitigation and food security are two of the main challenges of human society. Agroforestry systems, defined as the presence of trees on external and internal boundaries, cropland, or on any other available niche of farmland, can provide both climate change mitigation and food. There are several types of agroforestry systems with different rates of above ground and soil carbon (C) sequestration. The amount of carbon sequestered can depend on the type of system, climate, time since land use change and previous land use. Data was collected from a total of 86 published and peer reviewed studies on soil and above ground carbon sequestration for different agroforestry systems, climates and regions in the world. The objective was to understand which agroforestry systems provide the greatest benefits, and what are the main factors influencing, soil and above ground carbon sequestration. The results show that, on average, more soil carbon sequestration occurs in agroforestry systems classified as silvopastoral (4.38 tC ha−1 yr−1), and more above ground carbon sequestration occurs in improved fallows (11.29 tC ha−1 yr−1). On average, carbon benefits are greater in agroforestry systems Tropical climates when compared to agroforestry systems located in other climates, both in terms of soil (2.23 tC ha−1 yr−1) and above ground (4.85 tC ha−1 yr−1). In terms of land use change, the greatest above ground carbon sequestration (12.8 tC ha−1 yr−1) occurs when degraded land is replaced by improved fallow and the greatest soil carbon sequestration (4.38 tC ha−1 yr−1) results from the transition of a grassland system to a silvopastoral system. Time since the change is implemented was the main factor influencing above ground carbon sequestration, while climate mainly influences soil carbon sequestration most. The results of the analysis may be used to inform practitioners and policy makers on the most effective agroforestry system for carbon sequestration. The lack of data on carbon stocks before the implementation land use change and the lack of reporting on soil sampling design and variances were the main limitations in the data. The need to report this data should be considered in future studies if agroforestry systems are expected to play an important role as a climate change mitigation strategy.",
keywords = "climate change, meta-analysis, mitigation, trees, agriculture",
author = "Diana Feliciano and Alicia Ledo and Hillier, {Jonathan George} and Nayak, {Dali Rani}",
note = "This work was implemented as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), which is carried out with support from CGIAR Fund Donors (RG12839-10) and through bilateral funding agreements. For details please visit https://ccafs.cgiar.org/donors. This work has also been partially funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and Department of Agriculture (USDA). The views expressed in this document cannot be taken to reflect the official opinions of these organisations. The authors thank Kirsten MacSween for editing and revising the English of this article.",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.032",
language = "English",
volume = "254",
pages = "117--129",
journal = "Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which agroforestry options give the greatest soil and above ground carbon benefits in different world regions?

AU - Feliciano, Diana

AU - Ledo, Alicia

AU - Hillier, Jonathan George

AU - Nayak, Dali Rani

N1 - This work was implemented as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), which is carried out with support from CGIAR Fund Donors (RG12839-10) and through bilateral funding agreements. For details please visit https://ccafs.cgiar.org/donors. This work has also been partially funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and Department of Agriculture (USDA). The views expressed in this document cannot be taken to reflect the official opinions of these organisations. The authors thank Kirsten MacSween for editing and revising the English of this article.

PY - 2018/2/15

Y1 - 2018/2/15

N2 - Climate change mitigation and food security are two of the main challenges of human society. Agroforestry systems, defined as the presence of trees on external and internal boundaries, cropland, or on any other available niche of farmland, can provide both climate change mitigation and food. There are several types of agroforestry systems with different rates of above ground and soil carbon (C) sequestration. The amount of carbon sequestered can depend on the type of system, climate, time since land use change and previous land use. Data was collected from a total of 86 published and peer reviewed studies on soil and above ground carbon sequestration for different agroforestry systems, climates and regions in the world. The objective was to understand which agroforestry systems provide the greatest benefits, and what are the main factors influencing, soil and above ground carbon sequestration. The results show that, on average, more soil carbon sequestration occurs in agroforestry systems classified as silvopastoral (4.38 tC ha−1 yr−1), and more above ground carbon sequestration occurs in improved fallows (11.29 tC ha−1 yr−1). On average, carbon benefits are greater in agroforestry systems Tropical climates when compared to agroforestry systems located in other climates, both in terms of soil (2.23 tC ha−1 yr−1) and above ground (4.85 tC ha−1 yr−1). In terms of land use change, the greatest above ground carbon sequestration (12.8 tC ha−1 yr−1) occurs when degraded land is replaced by improved fallow and the greatest soil carbon sequestration (4.38 tC ha−1 yr−1) results from the transition of a grassland system to a silvopastoral system. Time since the change is implemented was the main factor influencing above ground carbon sequestration, while climate mainly influences soil carbon sequestration most. The results of the analysis may be used to inform practitioners and policy makers on the most effective agroforestry system for carbon sequestration. The lack of data on carbon stocks before the implementation land use change and the lack of reporting on soil sampling design and variances were the main limitations in the data. The need to report this data should be considered in future studies if agroforestry systems are expected to play an important role as a climate change mitigation strategy.

AB - Climate change mitigation and food security are two of the main challenges of human society. Agroforestry systems, defined as the presence of trees on external and internal boundaries, cropland, or on any other available niche of farmland, can provide both climate change mitigation and food. There are several types of agroforestry systems with different rates of above ground and soil carbon (C) sequestration. The amount of carbon sequestered can depend on the type of system, climate, time since land use change and previous land use. Data was collected from a total of 86 published and peer reviewed studies on soil and above ground carbon sequestration for different agroforestry systems, climates and regions in the world. The objective was to understand which agroforestry systems provide the greatest benefits, and what are the main factors influencing, soil and above ground carbon sequestration. The results show that, on average, more soil carbon sequestration occurs in agroforestry systems classified as silvopastoral (4.38 tC ha−1 yr−1), and more above ground carbon sequestration occurs in improved fallows (11.29 tC ha−1 yr−1). On average, carbon benefits are greater in agroforestry systems Tropical climates when compared to agroforestry systems located in other climates, both in terms of soil (2.23 tC ha−1 yr−1) and above ground (4.85 tC ha−1 yr−1). In terms of land use change, the greatest above ground carbon sequestration (12.8 tC ha−1 yr−1) occurs when degraded land is replaced by improved fallow and the greatest soil carbon sequestration (4.38 tC ha−1 yr−1) results from the transition of a grassland system to a silvopastoral system. Time since the change is implemented was the main factor influencing above ground carbon sequestration, while climate mainly influences soil carbon sequestration most. The results of the analysis may be used to inform practitioners and policy makers on the most effective agroforestry system for carbon sequestration. The lack of data on carbon stocks before the implementation land use change and the lack of reporting on soil sampling design and variances were the main limitations in the data. The need to report this data should be considered in future studies if agroforestry systems are expected to play an important role as a climate change mitigation strategy.

KW - climate change

KW - meta-analysis

KW - mitigation

KW - trees

KW - agriculture

UR - https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1WANhcA-ISCVH

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.032

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.032

M3 - Article

VL - 254

SP - 117

EP - 129

JO - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

JF - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

SN - 0167-8809

ER -