Who cares and how much

exploring the determinants of co-residential informal care

Emmanouil Mentzakis, Paul McNamee, Mandy Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The importance of informal care provided inside the household (co-residential care) is widely acknowledged in policy circles. However, the factors that determine the likelihood and scale of provision are not fully understood. A two-part model (2PM) is used to investigate both participation and levels of provision. Random effects dynamic panel specifications are employed. Results show that co-residential informal care competes with other time demanding activities, such as childcare and employment. Wealthier individuals are less likely to be caregivers, whereas wealthier households have a higher tendency towards care-giving. Evidence of both substitution and complementarity is found between formal and informal care. Informal care and health status are significantly related, with carers more likely to report worse General Health Questionnaire scores than non-carers. Finally, significant dynamic effects are observed with the continuance of the provision of informal care being more likely than the initiation of such activity, while heavy commitment in the past increases the hours provided in the current period.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-303
Number of pages21
JournalReview of Economics of the Household
Volume7
Issue number3
Early online date17 Dec 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

determinants
Informal care
substitution
health status
caregiver
commitment
participation
questionnaire
health
evidence
Household

Keywords

  • informal care provision
  • dynamic two-part panel model
  • panel-data models
  • secondary caregivers
  • opportunity costs
  • sample selection
  • elderly patients
  • health-care
  • home-care
  • allocation
  • labor
  • time

Cite this

Who cares and how much : exploring the determinants of co-residential informal care. / Mentzakis, Emmanouil; McNamee, Paul; Ryan, Mandy.

In: Review of Economics of the Household, Vol. 7, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 283-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7aaa30544a9d4018b612c3f6b3bd28ac,
title = "Who cares and how much: exploring the determinants of co-residential informal care",
abstract = "The importance of informal care provided inside the household (co-residential care) is widely acknowledged in policy circles. However, the factors that determine the likelihood and scale of provision are not fully understood. A two-part model (2PM) is used to investigate both participation and levels of provision. Random effects dynamic panel specifications are employed. Results show that co-residential informal care competes with other time demanding activities, such as childcare and employment. Wealthier individuals are less likely to be caregivers, whereas wealthier households have a higher tendency towards care-giving. Evidence of both substitution and complementarity is found between formal and informal care. Informal care and health status are significantly related, with carers more likely to report worse General Health Questionnaire scores than non-carers. Finally, significant dynamic effects are observed with the continuance of the provision of informal care being more likely than the initiation of such activity, while heavy commitment in the past increases the hours provided in the current period.",
keywords = "informal care provision, dynamic two-part panel model, panel-data models, secondary caregivers, opportunity costs, sample selection, elderly patients, health-care, home-care, allocation, labor, time",
author = "Emmanouil Mentzakis and Paul McNamee and Mandy Ryan",
note = "Acknowledgments: We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and Michael Grossman for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work was carried out whilst Emmanouil Mentzakis was a PhD student at the University of Aberdeen, funded by an MRC capacity building studentship. Mandy Ryan and Paul McNamee are funded by the University of Aberdeen. Financial support from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate is also acknowledged. Data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) were supplied by the ESRC Data Archive. The usual disclaimer applies.",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11150-008-9047-0",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "283--303",
journal = "Review of Economics of the Household",
issn = "1569-5239",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who cares and how much

T2 - exploring the determinants of co-residential informal care

AU - Mentzakis, Emmanouil

AU - McNamee, Paul

AU - Ryan, Mandy

N1 - Acknowledgments: We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and Michael Grossman for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work was carried out whilst Emmanouil Mentzakis was a PhD student at the University of Aberdeen, funded by an MRC capacity building studentship. Mandy Ryan and Paul McNamee are funded by the University of Aberdeen. Financial support from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate is also acknowledged. Data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) were supplied by the ESRC Data Archive. The usual disclaimer applies.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - The importance of informal care provided inside the household (co-residential care) is widely acknowledged in policy circles. However, the factors that determine the likelihood and scale of provision are not fully understood. A two-part model (2PM) is used to investigate both participation and levels of provision. Random effects dynamic panel specifications are employed. Results show that co-residential informal care competes with other time demanding activities, such as childcare and employment. Wealthier individuals are less likely to be caregivers, whereas wealthier households have a higher tendency towards care-giving. Evidence of both substitution and complementarity is found between formal and informal care. Informal care and health status are significantly related, with carers more likely to report worse General Health Questionnaire scores than non-carers. Finally, significant dynamic effects are observed with the continuance of the provision of informal care being more likely than the initiation of such activity, while heavy commitment in the past increases the hours provided in the current period.

AB - The importance of informal care provided inside the household (co-residential care) is widely acknowledged in policy circles. However, the factors that determine the likelihood and scale of provision are not fully understood. A two-part model (2PM) is used to investigate both participation and levels of provision. Random effects dynamic panel specifications are employed. Results show that co-residential informal care competes with other time demanding activities, such as childcare and employment. Wealthier individuals are less likely to be caregivers, whereas wealthier households have a higher tendency towards care-giving. Evidence of both substitution and complementarity is found between formal and informal care. Informal care and health status are significantly related, with carers more likely to report worse General Health Questionnaire scores than non-carers. Finally, significant dynamic effects are observed with the continuance of the provision of informal care being more likely than the initiation of such activity, while heavy commitment in the past increases the hours provided in the current period.

KW - informal care provision

KW - dynamic two-part panel model

KW - panel-data models

KW - secondary caregivers

KW - opportunity costs

KW - sample selection

KW - elderly patients

KW - health-care

KW - home-care

KW - allocation

KW - labor

KW - time

U2 - 10.1007/s11150-008-9047-0

DO - 10.1007/s11150-008-9047-0

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 283

EP - 303

JO - Review of Economics of the Household

JF - Review of Economics of the Household

SN - 1569-5239

IS - 3

ER -