Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data

O. Parry, Natasha Susan Mauthner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social scientist are increasingly encouraged to locate, access and analyse data from data archives worldwide. Although the vast majority of data archives which service the research community deal exclusively with the storage and provision of quantitative data facilities also exist for the deposit and <LF>reuse of qualitative data. While archiving is generally understood as relatively unproblematic by the quantitative research community there has been a mixed reaction to data archiving among qualitative social science researchers. Much of this concern stems from the assumption that qualitative data are similar to and may therefore be treated in the same way as quantitative data. However, the joint construction of qualitative data between researcher and respondent has important implications for the ownership and control of research material. The article suggests that the archiving of qualitative data raises a distinct set of issues surrounding confidentiality, respondent and researcher anonymity and respondent consent it examines some of the practical legal and ethical issues which may affect the archiving of qualitative research data and in doing so it reflects on the viability of using qualitative data for theoretical and substantive secondary analysis it also highlights the importance of drawing on the experience of other disciplines such as oral history, with a longer tradition of archiving in order to develop appropriate disciplinary guidance for social scientists engaged in qualitative research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-152
Number of pages13
JournalSociology
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Keywords

  • archiving qualitative data
  • confidentiality
  • consent
  • copyright
  • data protection
  • ownership
  • CONSENT

Cite this

Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data. / Parry, O.; Mauthner, Natasha Susan.

In: Sociology, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2004, p. 139-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parry, O. ; Mauthner, Natasha Susan. / Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data. In: Sociology. 2004 ; Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. 139-152.
@article{45ff56c2e9a746e79ce4a7a20ca3c525,
title = "Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data",
abstract = "Social scientist are increasingly encouraged to locate, access and analyse data from data archives worldwide. Although the vast majority of data archives which service the research community deal exclusively with the storage and provision of quantitative data facilities also exist for the deposit and <LF>reuse of qualitative data. While archiving is generally understood as relatively unproblematic by the quantitative research community there has been a mixed reaction to data archiving among qualitative social science researchers. Much of this concern stems from the assumption that qualitative data are similar to and may therefore be treated in the same way as quantitative data. However, the joint construction of qualitative data between researcher and respondent has important implications for the ownership and control of research material. The article suggests that the archiving of qualitative data raises a distinct set of issues surrounding confidentiality, respondent and researcher anonymity and respondent consent it examines some of the practical legal and ethical issues which may affect the archiving of qualitative research data and in doing so it reflects on the viability of using qualitative data for theoretical and substantive secondary analysis it also highlights the importance of drawing on the experience of other disciplines such as oral history, with a longer tradition of archiving in order to develop appropriate disciplinary guidance for social scientists engaged in qualitative research.",
keywords = "archiving qualitative data, confidentiality, consent, copyright, data protection, ownership, CONSENT",
author = "O. Parry and Mauthner, {Natasha Susan}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1177/0038038504039366",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "139--152",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data

AU - Parry, O.

AU - Mauthner, Natasha Susan

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Social scientist are increasingly encouraged to locate, access and analyse data from data archives worldwide. Although the vast majority of data archives which service the research community deal exclusively with the storage and provision of quantitative data facilities also exist for the deposit and <LF>reuse of qualitative data. While archiving is generally understood as relatively unproblematic by the quantitative research community there has been a mixed reaction to data archiving among qualitative social science researchers. Much of this concern stems from the assumption that qualitative data are similar to and may therefore be treated in the same way as quantitative data. However, the joint construction of qualitative data between researcher and respondent has important implications for the ownership and control of research material. The article suggests that the archiving of qualitative data raises a distinct set of issues surrounding confidentiality, respondent and researcher anonymity and respondent consent it examines some of the practical legal and ethical issues which may affect the archiving of qualitative research data and in doing so it reflects on the viability of using qualitative data for theoretical and substantive secondary analysis it also highlights the importance of drawing on the experience of other disciplines such as oral history, with a longer tradition of archiving in order to develop appropriate disciplinary guidance for social scientists engaged in qualitative research.

AB - Social scientist are increasingly encouraged to locate, access and analyse data from data archives worldwide. Although the vast majority of data archives which service the research community deal exclusively with the storage and provision of quantitative data facilities also exist for the deposit and <LF>reuse of qualitative data. While archiving is generally understood as relatively unproblematic by the quantitative research community there has been a mixed reaction to data archiving among qualitative social science researchers. Much of this concern stems from the assumption that qualitative data are similar to and may therefore be treated in the same way as quantitative data. However, the joint construction of qualitative data between researcher and respondent has important implications for the ownership and control of research material. The article suggests that the archiving of qualitative data raises a distinct set of issues surrounding confidentiality, respondent and researcher anonymity and respondent consent it examines some of the practical legal and ethical issues which may affect the archiving of qualitative research data and in doing so it reflects on the viability of using qualitative data for theoretical and substantive secondary analysis it also highlights the importance of drawing on the experience of other disciplines such as oral history, with a longer tradition of archiving in order to develop appropriate disciplinary guidance for social scientists engaged in qualitative research.

KW - archiving qualitative data

KW - confidentiality

KW - consent

KW - copyright

KW - data protection

KW - ownership

KW - CONSENT

U2 - 10.1177/0038038504039366

DO - 10.1177/0038038504039366

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 139

EP - 152

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 1

ER -