Why Brexit can’t transform Commonwealth trade

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Abstract

With the Commonwealth Games in Australia’s Gold Coast, public attention has turned to the oft-neglected Commonwealth of Nations. The 2018 games dovetail with the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in London on April 16-20, the first since the UK voted to leave the EU. Tales of sporting prowess have competed with speculation about the possibilities the Commonwealth may provide for a post-Brexit Britain.

Among hard Brexiters, re-engaging with the Commonwealth offers one of the more seductive “opportunities of Brexit”. Despite cautious neutrality prior to the referendum, and an initial response focused on mitigating risks, the Commonwealth secretary-general, Patricia Scotland, has pledged to “turbocharge the Commonwealth trade advantage”.
Original languageEnglish
Specialist publicationThe Conversation
PublisherThe Conversation UK
Publication statusPublished - 13 Apr 2018

Bibliographical note

Andrew Dilley has received funding from the Arts and Humanities Research Council. He is a member of the Liberal Democrats.

Keywords

  • Trade
  • India
  • CHOGM
  • Commonwealth
  • Economic History
  • Brexit
  • British Empire
  • Global trade

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Brexit can’t transform Commonwealth trade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this