Why Ecclesiology Cannot live by Doctrine Alone: a reply to John Webster's 'In the Society of God'

Christopher Brittain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This essay defends the significance of ethnography for ecclesiology. It does so by engaging with the ecclesiology of John Webster, particularly his essay ‘In the Society of God’, which directly challenges the appropriateness of ethnographic methods for a theology of the church. The discussion demonstrates the importance of Webster’s warning against the reduction of ecclesiology to an uncritical embrace of the apparent ‘givenness’ of empirical observations, but also argues that his approach is less useful for analyzing and criticizing the failures of the church community. The essay concludes by arguing that ethnography has the potential to enhance the church’s capacity to recognise, and thus confess, its sins, but also to deepen its corporate discernment and attentiveness to the presence of God’s activity in its midst.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-30
Number of pages26
JournalEcclesial Practices
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Ecclesiology
Doctrine
Deity
Ethnography
Presence of God
Theology
Discernment
Appropriateness
Givenness
Warning
Ethnographic Methods

Keywords

  • ethnography
  • ecclesiology
  • John Webster
  • doctrine
  • Ephraim Radner

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Why Ecclesiology Cannot live by Doctrine Alone : a reply to John Webster's 'In the Society of God'. / Brittain, Christopher.

In: Ecclesial Practices, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 5-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fd053c3fc624389889716ba875c1fa2,
title = "Why Ecclesiology Cannot live by Doctrine Alone: a reply to John Webster's 'In the Society of God'",
abstract = "This essay defends the significance of ethnography for ecclesiology. It does so by engaging with the ecclesiology of John Webster, particularly his essay ‘In the Society of God’, which directly challenges the appropriateness of ethnographic methods for a theology of the church. The discussion demonstrates the importance of Webster’s warning against the reduction of ecclesiology to an uncritical embrace of the apparent ‘givenness’ of empirical observations, but also argues that his approach is less useful for analyzing and criticizing the failures of the church community. The essay concludes by arguing that ethnography has the potential to enhance the church’s capacity to recognise, and thus confess, its sins, but also to deepen its corporate discernment and attentiveness to the presence of God’s activity in its midst.",
keywords = "ethnography , ecclesiology, John Webster, doctrine, Ephraim Radner",
author = "Christopher Brittain",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1163/22144471-00101001",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "5--30",
journal = "Ecclesial Practices",
issn = "2214-4463",
publisher = "Brill Academic Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Ecclesiology Cannot live by Doctrine Alone

T2 - a reply to John Webster's 'In the Society of God'

AU - Brittain, Christopher

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - This essay defends the significance of ethnography for ecclesiology. It does so by engaging with the ecclesiology of John Webster, particularly his essay ‘In the Society of God’, which directly challenges the appropriateness of ethnographic methods for a theology of the church. The discussion demonstrates the importance of Webster’s warning against the reduction of ecclesiology to an uncritical embrace of the apparent ‘givenness’ of empirical observations, but also argues that his approach is less useful for analyzing and criticizing the failures of the church community. The essay concludes by arguing that ethnography has the potential to enhance the church’s capacity to recognise, and thus confess, its sins, but also to deepen its corporate discernment and attentiveness to the presence of God’s activity in its midst.

AB - This essay defends the significance of ethnography for ecclesiology. It does so by engaging with the ecclesiology of John Webster, particularly his essay ‘In the Society of God’, which directly challenges the appropriateness of ethnographic methods for a theology of the church. The discussion demonstrates the importance of Webster’s warning against the reduction of ecclesiology to an uncritical embrace of the apparent ‘givenness’ of empirical observations, but also argues that his approach is less useful for analyzing and criticizing the failures of the church community. The essay concludes by arguing that ethnography has the potential to enhance the church’s capacity to recognise, and thus confess, its sins, but also to deepen its corporate discernment and attentiveness to the presence of God’s activity in its midst.

KW - ethnography

KW - ecclesiology

KW - John Webster

KW - doctrine

KW - Ephraim Radner

U2 - 10.1163/22144471-00101001

DO - 10.1163/22144471-00101001

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 5

EP - 30

JO - Ecclesial Practices

JF - Ecclesial Practices

SN - 2214-4463

IS - 1

ER -