Why estimation alone causes Markowitz portfolio selection to fail and what we might do about it

Elmira Mynbayeva, John D. Lamb* (Corresponding Author), Yuan Zhao

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Markowitz optimisation is well known to work poorly in practice, but it has not been clear why this happens. We show both theoretically and empirically that Markowitz optimisation is likely to fail badly, even with normally-distributed data, with no time series or correlation effects, and even with shrinkage estimators to reduce estimation risk. A core problem is that very often we cannot confidently distinguish between the mean returns of most assets. We develop a method, based on a sequentially rejective test procedure, to help remedy this problem by identifying subsets of assets indistinguishable in mean or variance. We test our method against naive Markowitz and compare it to other methods, including bootstrap aggregation, proposed to remedy the poor practical performance of Markowitz optimisation. We use out-of-sample and bootstrap tests on data from several market indices and hedge funds. We find our method is more robust than naive Markowitz and outperforms equally weighted portfolios but bootstrap aggregation works, as expected, better when we cannot distinguish among means. We also find evidence that covariance shrinkage improves performance.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Early online date26 Nov 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Portfolio optimisation
  • Multivariate statistics
  • Homogeneous subsets
  • Estimation risk
  • Bootstrap aggregation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why estimation alone causes Markowitz portfolio selection to fail and what we might do about it'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this