Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive?

David Heald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fiscal transparency is fundamentally important but difficult to achieve. The conceptualization of transparency has to be more sophisticated than current rhetoric implies. Analytical tools relating to the generic concept of transparency can be applied to public expenditure. Achieving transparency about public expenditure presents challenges that require explicit strategies in the context of what can be very different sets of local conditions. This article identifies the specific meaning of transparency about public expenditure, defined in terms of the four directions of transparency: inwards, outwards, upwards and downwards. It identifies barriers to the effective transparency of public expenditure, characterizing these as intrinsic or constructed. Tackling
these barriers, especially those constructed by policy actors, constitutes a route
towards more effective transparency, not only about public expenditure itself but
about surrogates for it. It is not just quantity that matters: different varieties of transparency will have differential effects on the achievement of public policy objectives. How transparency mechanisms are structured will therefore shape their impact on public policy – on efficiency, on equity and on democratic accountability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-49
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Review of Administrative Sciences
Volume78
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

public expenditures
transparency
public policy
rhetoric
equity
efficiency
responsibility

Keywords

  • barriers to transparency
  • directions of transparency
  • fiscal transparency
  • good governance
  • public accountability
  • public expenditure management
  • varieties of transparency

Cite this

Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive? / Heald, David.

In: International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 78, No. 1, 03.2012, p. 30-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{241fd0901a144042a4f512c87be922df,
title = "Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive?",
abstract = "Fiscal transparency is fundamentally important but difficult to achieve. The conceptualization of transparency has to be more sophisticated than current rhetoric implies. Analytical tools relating to the generic concept of transparency can be applied to public expenditure. Achieving transparency about public expenditure presents challenges that require explicit strategies in the context of what can be very different sets of local conditions. This article identifies the specific meaning of transparency about public expenditure, defined in terms of the four directions of transparency: inwards, outwards, upwards and downwards. It identifies barriers to the effective transparency of public expenditure, characterizing these as intrinsic or constructed. Tackling these barriers, especially those constructed by policy actors, constitutes a route towards more effective transparency, not only about public expenditure itself but about surrogates for it. It is not just quantity that matters: different varieties of transparency will have differential effects on the achievement of public policy objectives. How transparency mechanisms are structured will therefore shape their impact on public policy – on efficiency, on equity and on democratic accountability.",
keywords = "barriers to transparency, directions of transparency, fiscal transparency, good governance, public accountability, public expenditure management, varieties of transparency",
author = "David Heald",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0020852311429931",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "30--49",
journal = "International Review of Administrative Sciences",
issn = "0020-8523",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive?

AU - Heald, David

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Fiscal transparency is fundamentally important but difficult to achieve. The conceptualization of transparency has to be more sophisticated than current rhetoric implies. Analytical tools relating to the generic concept of transparency can be applied to public expenditure. Achieving transparency about public expenditure presents challenges that require explicit strategies in the context of what can be very different sets of local conditions. This article identifies the specific meaning of transparency about public expenditure, defined in terms of the four directions of transparency: inwards, outwards, upwards and downwards. It identifies barriers to the effective transparency of public expenditure, characterizing these as intrinsic or constructed. Tackling these barriers, especially those constructed by policy actors, constitutes a route towards more effective transparency, not only about public expenditure itself but about surrogates for it. It is not just quantity that matters: different varieties of transparency will have differential effects on the achievement of public policy objectives. How transparency mechanisms are structured will therefore shape their impact on public policy – on efficiency, on equity and on democratic accountability.

AB - Fiscal transparency is fundamentally important but difficult to achieve. The conceptualization of transparency has to be more sophisticated than current rhetoric implies. Analytical tools relating to the generic concept of transparency can be applied to public expenditure. Achieving transparency about public expenditure presents challenges that require explicit strategies in the context of what can be very different sets of local conditions. This article identifies the specific meaning of transparency about public expenditure, defined in terms of the four directions of transparency: inwards, outwards, upwards and downwards. It identifies barriers to the effective transparency of public expenditure, characterizing these as intrinsic or constructed. Tackling these barriers, especially those constructed by policy actors, constitutes a route towards more effective transparency, not only about public expenditure itself but about surrogates for it. It is not just quantity that matters: different varieties of transparency will have differential effects on the achievement of public policy objectives. How transparency mechanisms are structured will therefore shape their impact on public policy – on efficiency, on equity and on democratic accountability.

KW - barriers to transparency

KW - directions of transparency

KW - fiscal transparency

KW - good governance

KW - public accountability

KW - public expenditure management

KW - varieties of transparency

U2 - 10.1177/0020852311429931

DO - 10.1177/0020852311429931

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 30

EP - 49

JO - International Review of Administrative Sciences

JF - International Review of Administrative Sciences

SN - 0020-8523

IS - 1

ER -