Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited

Michael Inzlicht*, Brandon J. Schmeichel, C. Neil Macrae

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

294 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-control refers to the mental processes that allow people to override thoughts and emotions, thus enabling behavior to vary adaptively from moment to moment. Dominating contemporary research on this topic is the viewpoint that self-control relies upon a limited resource, such that engaging in acts of restraint depletes this inner capacity and undermines subsequent attempts at control (i.e., ego depletion). Noting theoretical and empirical problems with this view, here we advance a competing model that develops a non-resource-based account of self-control. We suggest that apparent regulatory failures reflect the motivated switching of task priorities as people strive to strike an optimal balance between engaging cognitive labor to pursue 'have-to' goals versus preferring cognitive leisure in the pursuit of 'want-to' goals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-133
Number of pages7
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume18
Issue number3
Early online date15 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • self-control
  • cognitive control
  • ego depletion
  • process model of depletion
  • motivation
  • attention
  • emotion
  • labor/leisure tradeoff
  • temporal dynamics of motivation
  • opportunity cost model
  • ego-depletion
  • resource-depletion
  • strength model
  • executive functions
  • task-performance
  • decision-making
  • error-detection
  • control failure

Cite this

Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. / Inzlicht, Michael; Schmeichel, Brandon J.; Macrae, C. Neil.

In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 127-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

Inzlicht, Michael ; Schmeichel, Brandon J. ; Macrae, C. Neil. / Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2014 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 127-133.
@article{8fc10078c45d49a09cd468cd8c70050c,
title = "Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited",
abstract = "Self-control refers to the mental processes that allow people to override thoughts and emotions, thus enabling behavior to vary adaptively from moment to moment. Dominating contemporary research on this topic is the viewpoint that self-control relies upon a limited resource, such that engaging in acts of restraint depletes this inner capacity and undermines subsequent attempts at control (i.e., ego depletion). Noting theoretical and empirical problems with this view, here we advance a competing model that develops a non-resource-based account of self-control. We suggest that apparent regulatory failures reflect the motivated switching of task priorities as people strive to strike an optimal balance between engaging cognitive labor to pursue 'have-to' goals versus preferring cognitive leisure in the pursuit of 'want-to' goals.",
keywords = "self-control, cognitive control, ego depletion, process model of depletion, motivation, attention, emotion, labor/leisure tradeoff, temporal dynamics of motivation, opportunity cost model, ego-depletion, resource-depletion, strength model, executive functions, task-performance, decision-making, error-detection, control failure",
author = "Michael Inzlicht and Schmeichel, {Brandon J.} and Macrae, {C. Neil}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "127--133",
journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",
issn = "1364-6613",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited

AU - Inzlicht, Michael

AU - Schmeichel, Brandon J.

AU - Macrae, C. Neil

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Self-control refers to the mental processes that allow people to override thoughts and emotions, thus enabling behavior to vary adaptively from moment to moment. Dominating contemporary research on this topic is the viewpoint that self-control relies upon a limited resource, such that engaging in acts of restraint depletes this inner capacity and undermines subsequent attempts at control (i.e., ego depletion). Noting theoretical and empirical problems with this view, here we advance a competing model that develops a non-resource-based account of self-control. We suggest that apparent regulatory failures reflect the motivated switching of task priorities as people strive to strike an optimal balance between engaging cognitive labor to pursue 'have-to' goals versus preferring cognitive leisure in the pursuit of 'want-to' goals.

AB - Self-control refers to the mental processes that allow people to override thoughts and emotions, thus enabling behavior to vary adaptively from moment to moment. Dominating contemporary research on this topic is the viewpoint that self-control relies upon a limited resource, such that engaging in acts of restraint depletes this inner capacity and undermines subsequent attempts at control (i.e., ego depletion). Noting theoretical and empirical problems with this view, here we advance a competing model that develops a non-resource-based account of self-control. We suggest that apparent regulatory failures reflect the motivated switching of task priorities as people strive to strike an optimal balance between engaging cognitive labor to pursue 'have-to' goals versus preferring cognitive leisure in the pursuit of 'want-to' goals.

KW - self-control

KW - cognitive control

KW - ego depletion

KW - process model of depletion

KW - motivation

KW - attention

KW - emotion

KW - labor/leisure tradeoff

KW - temporal dynamics of motivation

KW - opportunity cost model

KW - ego-depletion

KW - resource-depletion

KW - strength model

KW - executive functions

KW - task-performance

KW - decision-making

KW - error-detection

KW - control failure

U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009

DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009

M3 - Literature review

VL - 18

SP - 127

EP - 133

JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

SN - 1364-6613

IS - 3

ER -