Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso

H. Dong, B. Kouyate, John Alexander Cairns, F. Mugisha, R. Sauerborn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    89 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: To study the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a proposed community-based health insurance (CBI) scheme in order to provide information about the relationship between the premium that is required to cover the costs of the scheme and expected insurance enrolment levels. In addition, factors that influence WTP were to be identified.

    Methods: Data were collected from a household survey using a two-stage cluster sampling approach, with each household having the same probability of being selected. Interviews were conducted with 2414 individuals and 705 household heads. The take-it-or-leave-it (TIOLI) and the bidding game were used to elicit WTP.

    Results: The average individual was willing to pay 2384 (elicited by the TIOLI) or 3191 (elicited by the bidding game) CFA (US$ 3.17 or US$ 4.25) to join CBI for him/herself. The head of household agreed to pay from 6448 (elicited by the TIOLI) or 9769 (elicited by the bidding game) CFA (US$8.6 or US$ 13.03) to join the health insurance scheme for his/her household. These results were influenced by household and individual ability-to-pay, household and individual characteristics, such as age, sex and education. The two methods yielded similar patterns of estimated WTP, in that higher WTP was obtained for higher income level, higher previous medical expenditure, higher education, younger people and males. A starting point bias was found in the case of the bidding game.

    Conclusions: Both TIOLI and bidding game methods can elicit a value of WTP for CBI. The value elicited by the bidding game is higher than by the TIOLI, but the two approaches yielded similar patterns of estimated WTP. WTP information can be used for setting insurance premium. When setting the premiums, it is important to consider differences between the real market and the theoretical one, and between the WTP and the cost of benefits package. The beneficiaries of CBI should be enrolled at the level of households or villages in order to protect vulnerable groups such as women, elders and the poor. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)849-862
    Number of pages13
    JournalHealth Economics
    Volume12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • willingness-to-pay
    • contingent valuation method
    • community-based health insurance
    • Burkina Faso
    • health care financing
    • CONTINGENT VALUATION
    • HEALTH-CARE
    • SERVICES
    • QUALITY
    • ACCEPTABILITY
    • PREFERENCES
    • DISTRICT
    • SYMPTOMS
    • THERAPY
    • CENTERS

    Cite this

    Dong, H., Kouyate, B., Cairns, J. A., Mugisha, F., & Sauerborn, R. (2003). Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso. Health Economics, 12, 849-862. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.771

    Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso. / Dong, H.; Kouyate, B.; Cairns, John Alexander; Mugisha, F.; Sauerborn, R.

    In: Health Economics, Vol. 12, 2003, p. 849-862.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Dong, H, Kouyate, B, Cairns, JA, Mugisha, F & Sauerborn, R 2003, 'Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso', Health Economics, vol. 12, pp. 849-862. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.771
    Dong H, Kouyate B, Cairns JA, Mugisha F, Sauerborn R. Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso. Health Economics. 2003;12:849-862. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.771
    Dong, H. ; Kouyate, B. ; Cairns, John Alexander ; Mugisha, F. ; Sauerborn, R. / Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso. In: Health Economics. 2003 ; Vol. 12. pp. 849-862.
    @article{8bface0e33c14c0d941ca36e1c1a2e2c,
    title = "Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso",
    abstract = "Purpose: To study the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a proposed community-based health insurance (CBI) scheme in order to provide information about the relationship between the premium that is required to cover the costs of the scheme and expected insurance enrolment levels. In addition, factors that influence WTP were to be identified.Methods: Data were collected from a household survey using a two-stage cluster sampling approach, with each household having the same probability of being selected. Interviews were conducted with 2414 individuals and 705 household heads. The take-it-or-leave-it (TIOLI) and the bidding game were used to elicit WTP.Results: The average individual was willing to pay 2384 (elicited by the TIOLI) or 3191 (elicited by the bidding game) CFA (US$ 3.17 or US$ 4.25) to join CBI for him/herself. The head of household agreed to pay from 6448 (elicited by the TIOLI) or 9769 (elicited by the bidding game) CFA (US$8.6 or US$ 13.03) to join the health insurance scheme for his/her household. These results were influenced by household and individual ability-to-pay, household and individual characteristics, such as age, sex and education. The two methods yielded similar patterns of estimated WTP, in that higher WTP was obtained for higher income level, higher previous medical expenditure, higher education, younger people and males. A starting point bias was found in the case of the bidding game.Conclusions: Both TIOLI and bidding game methods can elicit a value of WTP for CBI. The value elicited by the bidding game is higher than by the TIOLI, but the two approaches yielded similar patterns of estimated WTP. WTP information can be used for setting insurance premium. When setting the premiums, it is important to consider differences between the real market and the theoretical one, and between the WTP and the cost of benefits package. The beneficiaries of CBI should be enrolled at the level of households or villages in order to protect vulnerable groups such as women, elders and the poor. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.",
    keywords = "willingness-to-pay, contingent valuation method, community-based health insurance, Burkina Faso, health care financing, CONTINGENT VALUATION, HEALTH-CARE, SERVICES, QUALITY, ACCEPTABILITY, PREFERENCES, DISTRICT, SYMPTOMS, THERAPY, CENTERS",
    author = "H. Dong and B. Kouyate and Cairns, {John Alexander} and F. Mugisha and R. Sauerborn",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1002/hec.771",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "849--862",
    journal = "Health Economics",
    issn = "1057-9230",
    publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso

    AU - Dong, H.

    AU - Kouyate, B.

    AU - Cairns, John Alexander

    AU - Mugisha, F.

    AU - Sauerborn, R.

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - Purpose: To study the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a proposed community-based health insurance (CBI) scheme in order to provide information about the relationship between the premium that is required to cover the costs of the scheme and expected insurance enrolment levels. In addition, factors that influence WTP were to be identified.Methods: Data were collected from a household survey using a two-stage cluster sampling approach, with each household having the same probability of being selected. Interviews were conducted with 2414 individuals and 705 household heads. The take-it-or-leave-it (TIOLI) and the bidding game were used to elicit WTP.Results: The average individual was willing to pay 2384 (elicited by the TIOLI) or 3191 (elicited by the bidding game) CFA (US$ 3.17 or US$ 4.25) to join CBI for him/herself. The head of household agreed to pay from 6448 (elicited by the TIOLI) or 9769 (elicited by the bidding game) CFA (US$8.6 or US$ 13.03) to join the health insurance scheme for his/her household. These results were influenced by household and individual ability-to-pay, household and individual characteristics, such as age, sex and education. The two methods yielded similar patterns of estimated WTP, in that higher WTP was obtained for higher income level, higher previous medical expenditure, higher education, younger people and males. A starting point bias was found in the case of the bidding game.Conclusions: Both TIOLI and bidding game methods can elicit a value of WTP for CBI. The value elicited by the bidding game is higher than by the TIOLI, but the two approaches yielded similar patterns of estimated WTP. WTP information can be used for setting insurance premium. When setting the premiums, it is important to consider differences between the real market and the theoretical one, and between the WTP and the cost of benefits package. The beneficiaries of CBI should be enrolled at the level of households or villages in order to protect vulnerable groups such as women, elders and the poor. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

    AB - Purpose: To study the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a proposed community-based health insurance (CBI) scheme in order to provide information about the relationship between the premium that is required to cover the costs of the scheme and expected insurance enrolment levels. In addition, factors that influence WTP were to be identified.Methods: Data were collected from a household survey using a two-stage cluster sampling approach, with each household having the same probability of being selected. Interviews were conducted with 2414 individuals and 705 household heads. The take-it-or-leave-it (TIOLI) and the bidding game were used to elicit WTP.Results: The average individual was willing to pay 2384 (elicited by the TIOLI) or 3191 (elicited by the bidding game) CFA (US$ 3.17 or US$ 4.25) to join CBI for him/herself. The head of household agreed to pay from 6448 (elicited by the TIOLI) or 9769 (elicited by the bidding game) CFA (US$8.6 or US$ 13.03) to join the health insurance scheme for his/her household. These results were influenced by household and individual ability-to-pay, household and individual characteristics, such as age, sex and education. The two methods yielded similar patterns of estimated WTP, in that higher WTP was obtained for higher income level, higher previous medical expenditure, higher education, younger people and males. A starting point bias was found in the case of the bidding game.Conclusions: Both TIOLI and bidding game methods can elicit a value of WTP for CBI. The value elicited by the bidding game is higher than by the TIOLI, but the two approaches yielded similar patterns of estimated WTP. WTP information can be used for setting insurance premium. When setting the premiums, it is important to consider differences between the real market and the theoretical one, and between the WTP and the cost of benefits package. The beneficiaries of CBI should be enrolled at the level of households or villages in order to protect vulnerable groups such as women, elders and the poor. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

    KW - willingness-to-pay

    KW - contingent valuation method

    KW - community-based health insurance

    KW - Burkina Faso

    KW - health care financing

    KW - CONTINGENT VALUATION

    KW - HEALTH-CARE

    KW - SERVICES

    KW - QUALITY

    KW - ACCEPTABILITY

    KW - PREFERENCES

    KW - DISTRICT

    KW - SYMPTOMS

    KW - THERAPY

    KW - CENTERS

    U2 - 10.1002/hec.771

    DO - 10.1002/hec.771

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 849

    EP - 862

    JO - Health Economics

    JF - Health Economics

    SN - 1057-9230

    ER -