Women’s Preferences for Communication with the Cervical Screening Programme: A Qualitative Study

Roshini Ravindran* (Corresponding Author), Seonaidh Cotton, Margaret Cruickshank

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background
In Scotland, invitations and results for cervical screening are sent by post. We ask the question: is this an effective means of communication in the 21st century? Consideration of other ways of communicating with women may help to increase acceptability of the cervical screening programme.

Objective
To explore perspectives of screening‐eligible women, regarding methods for communication of invitations and results from the cervical screening programme to improve acceptability.

Methods
A qualitative study design using semi‐structured face‐to‐face or telephone interviews with women aged 25‐65 years. Thirty interviews were directed using visual cues to generate discussion. Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of the data was conducted using a Framework approach.

Results
The main advantage of the postal system is its perceived formality; however, its lack of speed was a concern. Advantages of e‐communication included speed and convenience; however, concerns such as lack of confidentiality and access were mentioned. Telephone communication was deemed impractical, while face‐to‐face communication was highly regarded. Furthermore, the majority of participants felt screening appointments set at a specific date and time may improve uptake. Overall, participants believed there is no universal solution regarding the issue of communication.

Conclusion
At present, the postal system may be an appropriate method for invitation and results for cervical screening; however, there may be greater scope for preference of communication to improve the acceptability of the screening programme to women.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-52
Number of pages6
JournalCytopathology
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date30 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Communication
Interviews
Confidentiality
Scotland
Telephone
Cues
Appointments and Schedules

Keywords

  • cervical screening
  • cervix
  • communication

Cite this

Women’s Preferences for Communication with the Cervical Screening Programme : A Qualitative Study. / Ravindran, Roshini (Corresponding Author); Cotton, Seonaidh; Cruickshank, Margaret.

In: Cytopathology, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.2020, p. 47-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{38742f8254674e42ab3cddf0e862f4bd,
title = "Women’s Preferences for Communication with the Cervical Screening Programme: A Qualitative Study",
abstract = "BackgroundIn Scotland, invitations and results for cervical screening are sent by post. We ask the question: is this an effective means of communication in the 21st century? Consideration of other ways of communicating with women may help to increase acceptability of the cervical screening programme.ObjectiveTo explore perspectives of screening‐eligible women, regarding methods for communication of invitations and results from the cervical screening programme to improve acceptability.MethodsA qualitative study design using semi‐structured face‐to‐face or telephone interviews with women aged 25‐65 years. Thirty interviews were directed using visual cues to generate discussion. Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of the data was conducted using a Framework approach.ResultsThe main advantage of the postal system is its perceived formality; however, its lack of speed was a concern. Advantages of e‐communication included speed and convenience; however, concerns such as lack of confidentiality and access were mentioned. Telephone communication was deemed impractical, while face‐to‐face communication was highly regarded. Furthermore, the majority of participants felt screening appointments set at a specific date and time may improve uptake. Overall, participants believed there is no universal solution regarding the issue of communication.ConclusionAt present, the postal system may be an appropriate method for invitation and results for cervical screening; however, there may be greater scope for preference of communication to improve the acceptability of the screening programme to women.",
keywords = "cervical screening, cervix, communication",
author = "Roshini Ravindran and Seonaidh Cotton and Margaret Cruickshank",
note = "ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research took place in the University of Aberdeen and NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK. We are grateful to the women who participated in our study and the NHS staff at the Women's Day Clinic in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary for their support. Funding was obtained from NHS Grampian Endowment fund for summer studentship.",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cyt.12783",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "47--52",
journal = "Cytopathology",
issn = "0956-5507",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women’s Preferences for Communication with the Cervical Screening Programme

T2 - A Qualitative Study

AU - Ravindran, Roshini

AU - Cotton, Seonaidh

AU - Cruickshank, Margaret

N1 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research took place in the University of Aberdeen and NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK. We are grateful to the women who participated in our study and the NHS staff at the Women's Day Clinic in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary for their support. Funding was obtained from NHS Grampian Endowment fund for summer studentship.

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - BackgroundIn Scotland, invitations and results for cervical screening are sent by post. We ask the question: is this an effective means of communication in the 21st century? Consideration of other ways of communicating with women may help to increase acceptability of the cervical screening programme.ObjectiveTo explore perspectives of screening‐eligible women, regarding methods for communication of invitations and results from the cervical screening programme to improve acceptability.MethodsA qualitative study design using semi‐structured face‐to‐face or telephone interviews with women aged 25‐65 years. Thirty interviews were directed using visual cues to generate discussion. Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of the data was conducted using a Framework approach.ResultsThe main advantage of the postal system is its perceived formality; however, its lack of speed was a concern. Advantages of e‐communication included speed and convenience; however, concerns such as lack of confidentiality and access were mentioned. Telephone communication was deemed impractical, while face‐to‐face communication was highly regarded. Furthermore, the majority of participants felt screening appointments set at a specific date and time may improve uptake. Overall, participants believed there is no universal solution regarding the issue of communication.ConclusionAt present, the postal system may be an appropriate method for invitation and results for cervical screening; however, there may be greater scope for preference of communication to improve the acceptability of the screening programme to women.

AB - BackgroundIn Scotland, invitations and results for cervical screening are sent by post. We ask the question: is this an effective means of communication in the 21st century? Consideration of other ways of communicating with women may help to increase acceptability of the cervical screening programme.ObjectiveTo explore perspectives of screening‐eligible women, regarding methods for communication of invitations and results from the cervical screening programme to improve acceptability.MethodsA qualitative study design using semi‐structured face‐to‐face or telephone interviews with women aged 25‐65 years. Thirty interviews were directed using visual cues to generate discussion. Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of the data was conducted using a Framework approach.ResultsThe main advantage of the postal system is its perceived formality; however, its lack of speed was a concern. Advantages of e‐communication included speed and convenience; however, concerns such as lack of confidentiality and access were mentioned. Telephone communication was deemed impractical, while face‐to‐face communication was highly regarded. Furthermore, the majority of participants felt screening appointments set at a specific date and time may improve uptake. Overall, participants believed there is no universal solution regarding the issue of communication.ConclusionAt present, the postal system may be an appropriate method for invitation and results for cervical screening; however, there may be greater scope for preference of communication to improve the acceptability of the screening programme to women.

KW - cervical screening

KW - cervix

KW - communication

U2 - 10.1111/cyt.12783

DO - 10.1111/cyt.12783

M3 - Article

C2 - 31677212

VL - 31

SP - 47

EP - 52

JO - Cytopathology

JF - Cytopathology

SN - 0956-5507

IS - 1

ER -