Work organization, control and the experience of work in call centres

Jeffrey David Hyman, P. Taylor, G. Mulvey, P. Bain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

228 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the integration of telephone and VDU technologies, call centres are not uniform in terms of work organization. It is suggested that diversity can best be understood by reference to a range of quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Consequently, perspectives that treat all call centres as if they were the same hybrids of customization and routinization are rejected, along with over-optimistic interpretations of labour control over work organization. Empirical evidence from nine 'workflows' in two call centres - an established financial sector, organization and a rapidly growing outsourced operation - provide excellent grounds for an examination of similarity and difference. A picture emerges of workflows which are volume-driven and routinized, involving low levels of employee discretion, and, by contrast, those less dominated by quantitative criteria offering higher levels of operator discretion and an emphasis on the quality of customer service. Despite these distinctions, larger numbers of operators report an experience of work which is driven by quantitative imperatives, most manifest in the pervasive implementation of targets, Tar-gets are also used increasingly to assess and mould the quality of the call centre operator's interaction with the customer. Over-all, the evidence casts doubt on the optimistic perspective that call centre work, in time, will come to resemble 'knowledge work'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-150
Number of pages17
JournalWork, Employment & Society
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2002

Keywords

  • call centres
  • knowledge economy
  • Taylorism
  • work organization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Work organization, control and the experience of work in call centres'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this