Year 1 medical undergraduates knowledge of and attitudes to medical error

Rhona Flin, Rona Patey, Jeanette Jackson, Kathryn Mearns, Upul Dissanayaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context To improve patient safety, medical students should be taught about human error and the factors influencing adverse events. The optimal evaluation of new curricula for patient safety requires tools for baseline measurement of medical students’ attitudes and knowledge.

Objectives The aim of the study was to design and evaluate a questionnaire for measuring the attitudes of Year 1 medical students to patient safety and medical error.

Methods A questionnaire entitled ‘Medical Students’ Patient Safety Questionnaire (Year 1)’ was designed to assess Year 1 medical students’ attitudes and anticipated behaviours relating to medical error and patient safety. This was administered to two cohorts of Year 1 medical students in a UK medical school during 2008 (n = 296) and the data subjected to psychometric analyses.

Results Medical students’ attitudes to good patient safety practices were generally positive, but the students had little knowledge of how to report errors and were unsure about what to do if a colleague made an error or if a patient indicated that an error had been made. On the five scales of the questionnaire, Cronbach’s a values ranged from 0.59 (Attitudes to patient safety scale) to 0.88 (Knowledge of error and patient safety scale) and three scales showed internal consistencies below the recommended value of 0.70. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the five factors explain 51.7% of variance.

Conclusions With some minor item trimming and re-allocation, the Medical Students’ Patient Safety Questionnaire (Year 1) can function as an instrument with which to assess the attitudes of new medical students to patient safety and medical error. To assess the suitability of the instrument beyond the UK would require additional work.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1147-1155
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Education
Volume43
Issue number12
Early online date17 Nov 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

medical student
questionnaire
human error
psychometrics
Values
factor analysis
curriculum
event
evaluation
school

Cite this

Year 1 medical undergraduates knowledge of and attitudes to medical error. / Flin, Rhona; Patey, Rona; Jackson, Jeanette; Mearns, Kathryn; Dissanayaka, Upul.

In: Medical Education, Vol. 43, No. 12, 12.2009, p. 1147-1155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flin, Rhona ; Patey, Rona ; Jackson, Jeanette ; Mearns, Kathryn ; Dissanayaka, Upul. / Year 1 medical undergraduates knowledge of and attitudes to medical error. In: Medical Education. 2009 ; Vol. 43, No. 12. pp. 1147-1155.
@article{797ef0b4274b4081bb144272e3ef38ea,
title = "Year 1 medical undergraduates knowledge of and attitudes to medical error",
abstract = "Context To improve patient safety, medical students should be taught about human error and the factors influencing adverse events. The optimal evaluation of new curricula for patient safety requires tools for baseline measurement of medical students’ attitudes and knowledge.Objectives The aim of the study was to design and evaluate a questionnaire for measuring the attitudes of Year 1 medical students to patient safety and medical error.Methods A questionnaire entitled ‘Medical Students’ Patient Safety Questionnaire (Year 1)’ was designed to assess Year 1 medical students’ attitudes and anticipated behaviours relating to medical error and patient safety. This was administered to two cohorts of Year 1 medical students in a UK medical school during 2008 (n = 296) and the data subjected to psychometric analyses.Results Medical students’ attitudes to good patient safety practices were generally positive, but the students had little knowledge of how to report errors and were unsure about what to do if a colleague made an error or if a patient indicated that an error had been made. On the five scales of the questionnaire, Cronbach’s a values ranged from 0.59 (Attitudes to patient safety scale) to 0.88 (Knowledge of error and patient safety scale) and three scales showed internal consistencies below the recommended value of 0.70. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the five factors explain 51.7{\%} of variance.Conclusions With some minor item trimming and re-allocation, the Medical Students’ Patient Safety Questionnaire (Year 1) can function as an instrument with which to assess the attitudes of new medical students to patient safety and medical error. To assess the suitability of the instrument beyond the UK would require additional work.",
author = "Rhona Flin and Rona Patey and Jeanette Jackson and Kathryn Mearns and Upul Dissanayaka",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03499.x",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1147--1155",
journal = "Medical Education",
issn = "0308-0110",
publisher = "WILEY-BLACKWELL",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Year 1 medical undergraduates knowledge of and attitudes to medical error

AU - Flin, Rhona

AU - Patey, Rona

AU - Jackson, Jeanette

AU - Mearns, Kathryn

AU - Dissanayaka, Upul

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Context To improve patient safety, medical students should be taught about human error and the factors influencing adverse events. The optimal evaluation of new curricula for patient safety requires tools for baseline measurement of medical students’ attitudes and knowledge.Objectives The aim of the study was to design and evaluate a questionnaire for measuring the attitudes of Year 1 medical students to patient safety and medical error.Methods A questionnaire entitled ‘Medical Students’ Patient Safety Questionnaire (Year 1)’ was designed to assess Year 1 medical students’ attitudes and anticipated behaviours relating to medical error and patient safety. This was administered to two cohorts of Year 1 medical students in a UK medical school during 2008 (n = 296) and the data subjected to psychometric analyses.Results Medical students’ attitudes to good patient safety practices were generally positive, but the students had little knowledge of how to report errors and were unsure about what to do if a colleague made an error or if a patient indicated that an error had been made. On the five scales of the questionnaire, Cronbach’s a values ranged from 0.59 (Attitudes to patient safety scale) to 0.88 (Knowledge of error and patient safety scale) and three scales showed internal consistencies below the recommended value of 0.70. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the five factors explain 51.7% of variance.Conclusions With some minor item trimming and re-allocation, the Medical Students’ Patient Safety Questionnaire (Year 1) can function as an instrument with which to assess the attitudes of new medical students to patient safety and medical error. To assess the suitability of the instrument beyond the UK would require additional work.

AB - Context To improve patient safety, medical students should be taught about human error and the factors influencing adverse events. The optimal evaluation of new curricula for patient safety requires tools for baseline measurement of medical students’ attitudes and knowledge.Objectives The aim of the study was to design and evaluate a questionnaire for measuring the attitudes of Year 1 medical students to patient safety and medical error.Methods A questionnaire entitled ‘Medical Students’ Patient Safety Questionnaire (Year 1)’ was designed to assess Year 1 medical students’ attitudes and anticipated behaviours relating to medical error and patient safety. This was administered to two cohorts of Year 1 medical students in a UK medical school during 2008 (n = 296) and the data subjected to psychometric analyses.Results Medical students’ attitudes to good patient safety practices were generally positive, but the students had little knowledge of how to report errors and were unsure about what to do if a colleague made an error or if a patient indicated that an error had been made. On the five scales of the questionnaire, Cronbach’s a values ranged from 0.59 (Attitudes to patient safety scale) to 0.88 (Knowledge of error and patient safety scale) and three scales showed internal consistencies below the recommended value of 0.70. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the five factors explain 51.7% of variance.Conclusions With some minor item trimming and re-allocation, the Medical Students’ Patient Safety Questionnaire (Year 1) can function as an instrument with which to assess the attitudes of new medical students to patient safety and medical error. To assess the suitability of the instrument beyond the UK would require additional work.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03499.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03499.x

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1147

EP - 1155

JO - Medical Education

JF - Medical Education

SN - 0308-0110

IS - 12

ER -