A bottom-up method for feasible wind energy potential assessments, turbine and park placement

Tobias Jäger, Russell McKenna, Wolf Fichtner

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPublished conference contribution

Abstract

This work presents a bottom-up methodology based on graph-theoretical considerations to estimate the feasible potential as well as the economic costs of wind energy for the federal state of Baden-Württemberg in Germany on a wind farm level. Calculations are conducted based on high resolution land use data and wind speed data, using an algorithm to place wind farms by considering further constraints relating to land use planning. The feasible potential is found to be between 11.8 and 29.4 TWh, which is less than half than previous studies indicate for the technical potential since they neglect these constraints. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis reveals a strong dependency on parameters of land use planning, as they are very land-consuming. As an important input factor for energy systems models these results may improve the quality of commercial and political decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2015 12th International Conference on the European Energy Market
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
EditionEEM 2015
ISBN (Electronic)9781467366915
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Aug 2015
Event12th International Conference on the European Energy Market, EEM 2015 - Lisbon, Portugal
Duration: 19 May 201522 May 2015

Publication series

NameInternational Conference on the European Energy Market, EEM
Volume2015-August
ISSN (Print)2165-4077
ISSN (Electronic)2165-4093

Conference

Conference12th International Conference on the European Energy Market, EEM 2015
Country/TerritoryPortugal
CityLisbon
Period19/05/1522/05/15

Keywords

  • Power generation economics
  • Wind energy
  • Wind farms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A bottom-up method for feasible wind energy potential assessments, turbine and park placement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this