A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent

Susanne D. Thys*, Anne Lotte Coolen, Ingrid R. Martens, Herman P. Oosterbaan, Jan Paul W.R. Roovers, Ben Willem Mol, Marlies Y. Bongers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The objective of this study was to compare the Manchester Fothergill (MF) procedure with vaginal hysterectomy (VH) as surgical treatment of uterine descent. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent MF were matched for prolapse grade, age and parity to consecutive patients treated with VH. Evaluated outcomes included functional outcome, morbidity, recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and sexual function. Follow-up was performed using validated questionnaires. Results: We included 196 patients (98 patients per group). The response rate after a follow-up of 4-9 years was 80%. We found no differences in functional outcome and recurrence rates of POP between groups. Blood loss was significantly less and operating time was significantly shorter in the MF group. However, incomplete emptying of the bladder was more common in the MF group. Conclusions: The MF procedure is equally effective to the VH and should be considered as a surgical option that allows preservation of the uterus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1171-1178
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Keywords

  • Apical compartment
  • Manchester Fothergill
  • Pelvic organ prolapse
  • Recurrence
  • Vaginal hysterectomy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this