A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch

Benedict C. Jones, David R. Feinberg, Lisa DeBruine, Anthony C. Little, Jovana Vukovic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Women's preferences for masculine characteristics in men's voices and men's preferences for feminine characteristics in women's voices are thought to reflect adaptations that identify high quality (e.g., healthy) mates. Consistent with this proposal, here we show that men demonstrate stronger preferences for women's voices with raised pitch (i.e., feminised female voices) than women do and that women demonstrate stronger preferences for men's voices with lowered pitch (i.e., masculinised male voices) than men do. Importantly, however, no such opposite-sex bias was evident for attributions of dominance to voices with raised and lowered pitch; men's and women's voices with lowered pitch were perceived to be more dominant than those with raised pitch and these effects were equivalent for male and female listeners. Collectively, our findings suggest that preferences for voice pitch may function, at least in part, to identify high quality mates and show that opposite-sex biases in preferences for voice pitch cannot be explained simply by greater general sensitivity to manipulated pitch in opposite-sex voices than in own-sex voices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-62
Number of pages6
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume79
Issue number1
Early online date4 Nov 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

gender
dominance (genetics)
woman

Keywords

  • attraction
  • fundamental frequency
  • mate choice
  • mate preference
  • sexual dimorphism
  • sexual selection
  • vocal cue

Cite this

Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L., Little, A. C., & Vukovic, J. (2010). A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Animal Behaviour, 79(1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.003

A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. / Jones, Benedict C.; Feinberg, David R.; DeBruine, Lisa; Little, Anthony C.; Vukovic, Jovana.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 79, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 57-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jones, BC, Feinberg, DR, DeBruine, L, Little, AC & Vukovic, J 2010, 'A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch', Animal Behaviour, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.003
Jones, Benedict C. ; Feinberg, David R. ; DeBruine, Lisa ; Little, Anthony C. ; Vukovic, Jovana. / A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. In: Animal Behaviour. 2010 ; Vol. 79, No. 1. pp. 57-62.
@article{72c8702d4e5e4b88944dc2f28a5da7c0,
title = "A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch",
abstract = "Women's preferences for masculine characteristics in men's voices and men's preferences for feminine characteristics in women's voices are thought to reflect adaptations that identify high quality (e.g., healthy) mates. Consistent with this proposal, here we show that men demonstrate stronger preferences for women's voices with raised pitch (i.e., feminised female voices) than women do and that women demonstrate stronger preferences for men's voices with lowered pitch (i.e., masculinised male voices) than men do. Importantly, however, no such opposite-sex bias was evident for attributions of dominance to voices with raised and lowered pitch; men's and women's voices with lowered pitch were perceived to be more dominant than those with raised pitch and these effects were equivalent for male and female listeners. Collectively, our findings suggest that preferences for voice pitch may function, at least in part, to identify high quality mates and show that opposite-sex biases in preferences for voice pitch cannot be explained simply by greater general sensitivity to manipulated pitch in opposite-sex voices than in own-sex voices.",
keywords = "attraction, fundamental frequency, mate choice, mate preference, sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, vocal cue",
author = "Jones, {Benedict C.} and Feinberg, {David R.} and Lisa DeBruine and Little, {Anthony C.} and Jovana Vukovic",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "57--62",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch

AU - Jones, Benedict C.

AU - Feinberg, David R.

AU - DeBruine, Lisa

AU - Little, Anthony C.

AU - Vukovic, Jovana

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Women's preferences for masculine characteristics in men's voices and men's preferences for feminine characteristics in women's voices are thought to reflect adaptations that identify high quality (e.g., healthy) mates. Consistent with this proposal, here we show that men demonstrate stronger preferences for women's voices with raised pitch (i.e., feminised female voices) than women do and that women demonstrate stronger preferences for men's voices with lowered pitch (i.e., masculinised male voices) than men do. Importantly, however, no such opposite-sex bias was evident for attributions of dominance to voices with raised and lowered pitch; men's and women's voices with lowered pitch were perceived to be more dominant than those with raised pitch and these effects were equivalent for male and female listeners. Collectively, our findings suggest that preferences for voice pitch may function, at least in part, to identify high quality mates and show that opposite-sex biases in preferences for voice pitch cannot be explained simply by greater general sensitivity to manipulated pitch in opposite-sex voices than in own-sex voices.

AB - Women's preferences for masculine characteristics in men's voices and men's preferences for feminine characteristics in women's voices are thought to reflect adaptations that identify high quality (e.g., healthy) mates. Consistent with this proposal, here we show that men demonstrate stronger preferences for women's voices with raised pitch (i.e., feminised female voices) than women do and that women demonstrate stronger preferences for men's voices with lowered pitch (i.e., masculinised male voices) than men do. Importantly, however, no such opposite-sex bias was evident for attributions of dominance to voices with raised and lowered pitch; men's and women's voices with lowered pitch were perceived to be more dominant than those with raised pitch and these effects were equivalent for male and female listeners. Collectively, our findings suggest that preferences for voice pitch may function, at least in part, to identify high quality mates and show that opposite-sex biases in preferences for voice pitch cannot be explained simply by greater general sensitivity to manipulated pitch in opposite-sex voices than in own-sex voices.

KW - attraction

KW - fundamental frequency

KW - mate choice

KW - mate preference

KW - sexual dimorphism

KW - sexual selection

KW - vocal cue

U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.003

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 57

EP - 62

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

IS - 1

ER -