A preliminary study on evaluating Consultation Notes with Post-Editing

Francesco Moramarco, Aleksandar Savkov, Alex Papadopoulos Korfiatis, Ehud Reiter

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Automatic summarisation has the potential to aid physicians in streamlining clerical tasks such as note taking. But it is notoriously difficult to evaluate these systems and demonstrate that they are safe to be used in a clinical setting. To circumvent this issue, we propose a semi-automatic approach whereby physicians post-edit generated notes before submitting them. We conduct a preliminary study on the time saving of automatically generated consultation notes with post-editing. Our evaluators are asked to listen to mock consultations and to post-edit three generated notes. We time this and find that it is faster than writing the note from scratch. We present insights and lessons learnt from this experiment.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherArXiv
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 9 Apr 2021

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A preliminary study on evaluating Consultation Notes with Post-Editing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this